You are here:

Stepping up the Ladder - Competence Development Through E-Learning?!
PROCEEDINGS

, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany ; , ESC Rennes, France ; , University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Vienna, Austria ISBN 978-1-880094-65-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

In this paper we argue that e-learning is changing from a primarily distributive mode to a more collaborative mode. This enables e-learning to step up the ladder, and to turn to competence oriented pedagogical models. Three steps are taken: First, the changes e-learning is currently undergoing are explored and summarised, secondly, the concept of competence is defined, and thirdly, pedagogical conditions for competency oriented e-learning are elaborated. The paper results in illustrating competence-based learning by a applying Kolb’s learning cycle.

Citation

Ehlers, U., Schneckenberg, D. & Adelsberger, H.H. (2008). Stepping up the Ladder - Competence Development Through E-Learning?!. In J. Luca & E. Weippl (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2008--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 4068-4082). Vienna, Austria: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 22, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. 2. Baumgartner, P. (1993). Der Hintergrund des Wissens. Vorarbeiten zu einer Kritik der programmierbaren Vernunft. Klagenfurt.
  2. 5. Boud D., Keogh R. And Walker D. (1985). Reflection: Turning Experience into Learning, London.
  3. 6. Brockbank A. And McGill I. (1998). Facilitating Reflective Learning in Higher Education, Buckingham.
  4. 7. Cowan J. (1998). On Becoming an Innovative University Teacher Reflection in Action, SRHE/OU.
  5. 8. Dejoux, C. (1996). Organisation qualifiante et maturité en gestion des compétences. Personnel 369, 61-67.
  6. 9. Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York. Bern: Haupt.
  7. 10. Downes, S. (2007). E-Learning 2.0. In development. Online: http://www.slideshare.net/Downes/elearning-20-indevelopment [2007-12-18].
  8. 11. Ehlers, U.-D. (2007). Making the Difference in E-Learning: Towards Competence Development and E-Irritation. In: Bernath, U. (ed.). Research in distance education and online learning, ASF Series, Oldenburg.
  9. 12. Erpenbeck, J. (2005). Kompetenzmessung als Bildungscontrolling im E-Learning. In: Ehlers, U, Schenkel, P. (2006). Weiterbildungscontrolling im E-Learning: Jenseits des RoI. Heidelberg. 13. Euler, D. & Hahn, A. (2004). Wirtschaftsdidaktik.
  10. North, K. (2005). Wissensorientierte Unternehmensfü hrung. Gabler-Verlag, Wiesbaden.
  11. 14. Garrison D. (2004). E-Learning in the 21st Century. London.
  12. 15. Heyse, V., Erpenbeck, J. (1997). Der Sprung ü ber die Kompetenzbarriere: Kommunikation, selbst-organisiertes Lernen und Kompetenzentwicklung von und in Unternehmen. Bielefeld.
  13. 16. IMS Global Learning Consortium (2004): http://www.imsglobal.org/ep/epv1p0/imsep_bestv1p0.html #1663600, [2007-1218]
  14. 17. Kerres, M. (2006). Potenziale von Web 2.0 nutzen. In: Andreas Hohenstein, Karl Wilbers (ed.) Handbuch E-Learning, M ü nchen: DWD vorl ä ufige Fassung, 5. August 2006 [PDF] http://mediendidaktik.uni-duisburg-essen.de/files/web20-A.pdf [2007-12-12]
  15. 18. Kolb D.A. (1984). Experiential Learning experience as a source of learning and development. New Jersey.
  16. 19. Mandl, H., Gruber, H., & Renkl, A. (1997). Lernen und Lehren mit dem Computer. In Psychologie der Erwachsenenbildung (S. 437-467). In Enzyklop ä die der Psychologie, Bd. IV, Gö ttingen U.A.
  17. 20. Mandl, H., Krause, U.-M. (2001). Lernkompetenz fü r die Wissensgesellschaft. Forschungsbericht Nr. 145. M ü nchen.
  18. 21. Mayes T. (2004). Review of e-learning theories, frameworks and models. JISC e-Learning Models Desk Study. Online: http://www.elearning.ac.uk/resources/modelsdeskreview/ [2007-12-18]
  19. 22. McAfee, A. (2005). Enterprise 2.0: The Dawn of Emergent Collaboration. MIT Sloan Review 47(3), 21-29.
  20. 24. Moon J. (1999). Reflection in Learning and Professional Development Theory and Practice, London.
  21. 25. Musser, J., O'Reilly, T. (2006). Web 2.0-Principles and Best Practices. Sebastopol CA: O'Reilly Media, Inc. 26. O’ Reily, T. (2005). What is Web 2.0? Online: http://www.oreilly.de/artikel/web20.html [2007-12-12]
  22. 27. OECD (2005). E-Learning in Tertiary Education: Where do we stand? Paris.
  23. 28. Privateer, P.M. (1999). Academic Technology and the Future of Higher Education: strategic paths not to take, The Journal of Higher Education, 70, pp. 60-79.
  24. 29. Salzgeber, G. (1996). Reflexion (in) der Praxissituation im Projektstudium Betriebsp ä dagogik. Eine "Lehr-Geschichte" zur Ausbildung von Studierenden im Umgang mit komplexen, unsicheren, einzigartigen, wert-und interessenbeladenen Praxissituationen. Innsbruck, 1996.
  25. 30. Schneckenberg, D. & Wildt, J. (2006). Understanding the Concept of eCompetence for Academic Staff. In I. Mac Labhrainn, C. McDonald Legg, D. Schneckenberg, J. Wildt (Eds.), The Challenge of eCompetence in Academic Staff Development (pp. 29-35). Galway: NUI Galway.
  26. 31. Schneckenberg, D. (2007). ECompetence Development Measures for Faculty in Higher Education-A Comparative International Investigation. PhD Dissertation, University of Duisburg-Essen. Essen: DuePublico University Press.
  27. 32. Schön D. (1991). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action, London.
  28. 33. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York.
  29. 34. Schön, D. (1986). Educationg the reflective Practitioner. New York.
  30. 35. Seufert, S., Brahm, T. (2007). Ne(x)t Generation Learning: Wikis, Blogs, Mediacasts & Co. Social Software und Personal Broadcasting auf der Spur. Themenreihe I. SCIL-Arbeitsbericht 12. (edted by Eulert, D. & Seufert, S.). St. Gallen.
  31. 36. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), pp. 413.
  32. 37. Stieler-Lorenz, B., Krause, A. (2003). Mit E-Learning zum I-Learning– die Herausforderung zur kompetenzfö rderlichen Lernkulturgestaltung. QUEM Report, Heft 80, pp. 75-136.
  33. 39. Varner, D., Peck, S. (2003). Learning From Learning Journals: The Benefits And Challenges Of Using Learning Journal. Journal of Management Education.
  34. 40. Weinert, F.E. (1999). Definition and Selection of Competencies-Concepts of Competence. Munich: Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research.
  35. 41. Wildt, J. (2006). Kompetenz als Learning Outcome. Dortmund.
  36. 42. Winterton J., Delamare Le Deist F., Stringfellow E. (2005). Typology of knowledge, skills and competences: clarification of the concept and prototype (Research report elaborated on behalf of Cedefop/Thessaloniki). Toulouse: Toulouse Business School-Centre for European Research on Employment and Human Resources.
  37. 43. Zawacki-Richter, O. (2004). Komptenzkapital: Ansä tze des betrieblichen Kompetenzmanagements und E-LearningSzenarien. In: Hasebrook, J., Zawacki-Richter, O., Erpenbeck, J. Ed. 2004. Kompetenzkapital – Verbindungen zwischen Kompetenzbilanzen und Humankapital, Bankakademie Verlag, Frankfurt A.M. –

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.