You are here:

Using DyKnow to Enhance Interaction in an Internet Protocol Television Class
PROCEEDINGS

, , , Fort Hays State University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in San Antonio, Texas, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-61-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

Interaction is important to effective learning. Moore (1989) defined three types of interaction: learn-content interaction, instructor-learner interaction, and learner-learner interaction. With the advancement of telecommunication technologies, Hillman, Willis, and Gunawardena (1994) added another type of interaction that learners need to succeed in distance learning: learner-interface interaction. Survey data from an IPTV class were analyzed based on this framework of interaction. The study found that the new software used on the tablet enhanced the four types of interaction and made learning more fun and engaging to the students.

Citation

Wang, H., Gould, L. & Fulton, D. (2007). Using DyKnow to Enhance Interaction in an Internet Protocol Television Class. In R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2007--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 539-544). San Antonio, Texas, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 26, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Chickering, A.W., & Ehrmann, S.C. (1996). Implementing the seven principles: technology as lever. AAHE Bulletin. Retrieved August 5, 2006, from http://www.aahebulletin.com/public/archive/sevenprinciples.asp
  2. Hillman, D.C.A., Willis, D.J., & Gunawardena, C.N. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8 (2), 30-42.
  3. Jonassen, D.H. (1992). Evaluating constructivistic learning. In T.M. Duffy& D.H. Jonassen (Eds.), Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation (pp. 137-148). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  4. Keegan, D. (1996). Foundations of distance education. New York: Routledge.
  5. Lipman (1991) Lipman, M. (1991). Thinking in education. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Moore, M.G. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3 (2), 1-6.
  7. Northrup, P. (2001). A framework for designing interactivity into Web-based instruction. Educational Technology, 41 (2), 31-39.
  8. Sims, R. (1999). Interactivity on stage: Strategies for learner-designer communication. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 15 (3), 257-272.
  9. Vrasidas, C., & McIsaac, M.S. (1999). Factors influencing interaction in an online course. The American Journal of Distance Education, 13(3), 22-36.
  10. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.