You are here:

“…You think for me, so I don’t have to.” The Effect of a Technology-Enhanced, Inquiry Learning Environment on Student Learning in 11th grade United States History
Article

, Wake Forest University, United States ; , University of North Carolina at Charlotte, United States

CITE Journal Volume 7, Number 3, ISSN 1528-5804 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

In a study investigating the effects of student engagement in inquiry learning through the development of Web sites, nearly every student reported having enjoyed the project, and the majority scored an A or B for their project grade. However, neither enjoyment nor high achievement on this performance task necessarily translated into high scores on the unit test. Therefore, this paper explores why success in a technology rich inquiry environment did not translate to measurable changes in student learning. Results demonstrated that students were not accustomed to this type of pedagogy and that the assessment did not match the task.

Citation

Friedman, A.M. & Heafner, T.L. (2007). “…You think for me, so I don’t have to.” The Effect of a Technology-Enhanced, Inquiry Learning Environment on Student Learning in 11th grade United States History. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(3), 199-216. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved March 18, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Booth, M. (1993). Students’ historical thinking and the national history curriculum in England. Theory and Research in Social Education, 21(2), 105-127.
  2. Braun, J., & Risinger, F. (1999). Surfing social studies. Washington, DC: National Council for the Social Studies.
  3. Cohen, D.J., & Rosenzweig, R. (2006). Digital history: A guide to gathering, preserving, and presenting the past on the Web. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  4. Friedman, A.M. (2006). World history teachers’ use of digital primary sources: The effect of training. Theory and Research in Social Education, 34(1), 124-141.
  5. Friedman, A.M., & Heafner, T. (2006, November). Website construction in ninth grade social studies. In K. Swan (Chair), Technology Research in the K-12 History Classroom. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the College and University Faculty Assembly, Washington, DC.
  6. Friedman, A.M., & Hicks, D. (2006). The state of the field: Technology, social studies, and teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 6(2). Retrieved July 2, 2007, from http://www.citejournal.org/vol6/iss2/socialstudies/article1.cfm
  7. Heafner, T.L., & Friedman, A.M. (2007, March). The effect of website development on student attitudes and interest in 11th grade United States history. Paper presented at the Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(3)
  8. Hicks, D., & Ewing, E.T. (2003). Bringing the world into the classroom with online global newspapers. Social Education, 67(3), 134-139.
  9. Lee, J.K., & Clarke, W.G. (2003). High school social studies students’ uses of online historical documents related to the Cuban Missile Crisis. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2(1), 1-15.
  10. Lee, J.K., & Hicks, D. (2006). Editorial: Discourse on technology in social education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 6(4). Retrieved July 2, 2007, from http://www.citejournal.org/vol6/iss4/socialstudies/article1.cfm
  11. Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007). Social networking sites and teens: An overview. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved February 9, 2007, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_SNS_Data_Memo_Jan_2007.pdf
  12. Lenhart, A., Madden, M., & Hitlin, P. (2005). Teens and technology: Youth are leading the transition to a fully wired and mobile nation. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved February 9, 2007, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Teens_Tech_July2005web.pdf
  13. Levin, D., & Arafeh, S. (2002). The digital disconnect: The widening gap between Internet-savvy students and their schools. Washington, DC: Pew Internet& American Life Project. Retrieved March 14, 2007, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Schools_Internet_Report.pdf
  14. Levstik, L.S., & Barton, K.C. (2001). Doing history: Investigating with children in elementary and middle schools. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  15. Marshall, C. & Rossman, G.B. (1999). Designing qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  16. Martorella, P.H. (1997). Technology and the social studies– or: Which way to the sleeping giant. Theory and Research in Social Education, 25(4), 511-514.
  17. Mason, C., Berson, M., Diem, R., Hicks, D., Lee, J., & Dralle, T.(2000). Guidelines for using technology to prepare social studies teachers. Contemporary Issues in Technology Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(3) and Teacher Education [Online serial], 1 (1). Retrieved July 2, 2007, from http://www.citejournal.org/vol1/iss1/currentissues/socialstudies/article1.htm
  18. McGlinn, M. (2007). Using the "Documenting the American South" Digital Library in the social studies: A case study of the experiences of teachers in the field. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 7(1). Retrieved July 2, 2007, from http://www.citejournal.org/vol7/iss1/socialstudies/article1.cfm.
  19. Milman, N.B., & Heinecke, W.F. (2000). Innovative integration of technology in an undergraduate history course. Theory and Research in Social Education, 28(4), 546-565.
  20. Milson, A.J. (2002). The Internet and inquiry learning: Integrating medium and method in a sixth grade social studies classroom. Theory and Research in Social Education, 30(3), 330-353.
  21. Parsad, B., & Jones, J. (2005). Internet access in U.S. Public schools and classrooms: 1994-2003. (NCES 2005-015). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
  22. Saye, J.W., & Brush, T. (1999). Student engagement with social issues in a multimedia supported learning environment. Theory and Research in Social Education, 27(4), 472504.
  23. Saye, J.W., & Brush, T. (2006). Comparing teachers’ strategies for supporting student inquiry in a problem-based multimedia-enhanced history unit. Theory and Research in Social Education, 34(2), 183-212.
  24. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  25. Thornton, S.J. (1991). Teacher as curricular-instructional gatekeeper in social studies. In J.P. Shaver (Ed.), Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning (pp. 237-248). New York: Maxwell Macmillan International.
  26. VanFossen P.J., & Shiveley, J.M. (2000). Using the Internet to create primary source teaching packets. The Social Studies, 91(6), 244-252.
  27. Whitworth, S.A., & Berson, M.J. (2003). Computer technology in the social studies: An examination of the effectiveness literature (1996-2001). Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 2(4). Retrieved July 2, 2007, from http://www.citejournal.org/vol2/iss4/socialstudies/article1.cfm

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.