You are here:

Teacher Perspectives on Online Collaborative Learning: Factors Perceived as Facilitating and Impeding Successful Online Group Work
Article

, William Paterson University, United States ; , Pratt Institute, United States ; , UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA, United States

CITE Journal Volume 8, Number 1, ISSN 1528-5804 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

This study examined the factors perceived by in-service teachers as either facilitating or impeding successful completion of online group work in a virtual graduate school of education program. Based on a quantified qualitative data analysis of open-ended questions, five facilitative factors were identified as (a) individual accountability, (b) affective team support, (c) the presence of a positive group leader, (d) consensus building skills, and (e) clear instructions. There were also seven impeding factors perceived by the teacher participants. Although four of the factors described a lack of the aforementioned facilitative factors, another three broached new, problematic issues that need to be further considered in online teacher education programs. At the conclusion of this article, recommendations are provided that online teacher educators might consider as they initiate group projects in online environments.

Citation

An, H., Kim, S. & Kim, B. (2008). Teacher Perspectives on Online Collaborative Learning: Factors Perceived as Facilitating and Impeding Successful Online Group Work. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(1), 65-83. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved February 21, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. An, H., & Kim, S. (2007). The perceived benefits and difficulties of online groupwork in a teacher education program. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 4(5). Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/May_07/article01.htm
  2. Barab, S. (2004). R695 Building online communities. Retrieved December 17, 2007, from http://inkido.indiana.edu/onlinecom/summer.html
  3. Belanger, F., & Jordan, D.H. (2000). Evaluation and implementation of distance learning: Technologies tools and techniques. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
  4. Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructionaldesign theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. (Vol. 2, pp. 269292).
  5. Branon, R.F., & Essex, C. (2001). Synchronous and asynchronous communication tools in distance education. TechTrends, 45 (1), 36, 42.
  6. Brown, J.S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
  7. Bruckman, A. (1998). Community support for constructionist learning. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 7(1-2), 47-86.
  8. Carroll, J.M., Neale, D.C., Isenhour, P.L., Rosson, M.B., & McCrickard, D.S. (2003). Notification and awareness: Synchronizing task-oriented collaborative activity. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 58, 605-632.
  9. Chi, M.T.H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271-315.
  10. Cohen, E.G. (2001). A shifting social context: NSSE looks at equity in schools and classrooms. In L. Corno (Ed.), Education across a century: The centennial volume (pp. 76-99). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
  11. Cordero-Ponce, W.L. (2000). Summarization instruction: Effects on foreign language comprehension and summarization of expository texts. Reading Research and Instruction, 39(4), 329-350.
  12. Creswell, J.W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. London: SAGE Publications. 76
  13. Dede, C., & Kremer, A. (1999). Increasing students’ participation via multiple interactive media. Inventio, 1(1). Retrieved from http://www.doit.gmu.edu/Archives/feb98/dede_1.htm
  14. Dewiyanti, S., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Jochems, W. (2005). Applying reflection and moderation in an asynchronous computer-supported collaborative learning environment in campus-based higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(4), 673-676.
  15. Dirkx, J.M., & Smith, R.O. (2004). Thinking out of a bowl of spaghetti: Learning to learning in online collaborative groups. In T.S. Roberts (Ed.), Online collaborative learning: Theory and practice (pp. 132-159). Hershey, PA: Information Science
  16. Dourish, P., & Bellotti, V. (1992). Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 107-114).
  17. Flavell, J.H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F.E. Weinert & R.H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 21-29). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  18. Gagné, R.M., Briggs, L.J., & Wager, W.W. (1992). Principles of instructional design (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
  19. Gokhale, A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7, 1-2. Retrieved from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JTE/jte-v7n1/gokhale.jte-v7n1.html
  20. Gunawardena, C.N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2/3), 147–166.
  21. Hiltz, S.R., & Turoff, M. (2002). What makes learning effective? Communications of the ACM, 45 (4), 56-59.
  22. Hotte, R., & Pierre, S. (2002). Leadership and conflict management support in a cooperative telelearning environment. International Journal of E-Learning: Corporate, Government, Healthcare, & Higher Education, 1(2), 46-59.
  23. Jegede, O.J. (2002). Facilitating and sustaining interest through an on-line distance peer-tutoring system in a cooperative learning environment. Virtual University Gazette, 35-45.
  24. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (1989). Cooperation and competition: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
  25. Johnson, D.W., & Johnson, R.T. (2004). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D.H. Johanssen. (2nd ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 785-811). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  26. Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, K.A. (1991). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
  27. Kochan, F.K. (2000). Models for enhancing the professional development for teachers: Overview and framework. In D.J. McIntyre and D.M. Byrd (Eds.), Research on effective models for teacher education: Teacher education yearbook 8 (pp. 1 –9). Thousand Oaks,
  28. Leow, R.P. (2000). A study of the role of awareness in foreign language 'textautospace:none'.
  29. Levine, J.M., Resnick, L.B., & Higgins, T. (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 585-612.
  30. McInnerney, J. & Robert, T.S. (2004). Collaborative or cooperative learning? In T.S. Roberts (Ed.), Online collaborative learning: Theory and practice (pp. 203-214).
  31. Ortiz, B.I. (2006). Online collaborative problem-based learning. Retrieved December 17, 2007, from http://www.columbia.edu/~bil2001/OnlinePBL/de.shtml
  32. Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and the three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74, 557-577.
  33. Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307-332.
  34. Pierce, J.W. (2003). Applying learner-centered principles in teacher education. Theory Into Practice, 42(2), 127-132.
  35. Rourke, L. (2000). Operationalizing social interaction in computer conferencing. In Proceedings of the 16th annual conference of the Canadian Association for Distance 78 Education. Quebec City. Retrieved December 17, 2007, from http://www.ulaval.ca/aced2000cade/francais/Actes/Rourke-Liam.html
  36. Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2004). Validity in quantitative content analysis. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 52(1), 5-18.
  37. Ruhleder, K., & Michael, T. (2000). Reflective collaborative learning on the web: Drawing on the masterclass, First Monday, 5(5). Retrieved from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue5_5/ruhleder/
  38. Schulz, B. (2003). Collaborative learning in an online environment: Will it work for teacher training? In Proceedings of the 14th annual Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 503-504). Charlottesville, VA:
  39. Smith, K.A. (1995). Cooperative learning: Effective teamwork for engineering classrooms. Retrieved December 17, 2007, from http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie95/2b5/2b54/2b54.htm
  40. Thomas, M.J.W. (2002) Learning within incoherent structures: The space of online discussion forums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 351-366.
  41. Vrasidas, C., & Glass, G.V. (2003). Teacher professional development: Issues and trends. In J. Raths & A.C. McAninch (Eds.), Teacher beliefs and classroom performance: The impact of teacher education (pp. 1-12). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
  42. Wang, Y.-M. (2002). From teacher-centredness to student-centredness: Are preservice teachers making the conceptual shift when teaching in Information Age classrooms? Educational Media International, 39(3-4), 257-265.
  43. Weiss, R.E., Knowlton, D.S., & Speck, B.W. (Eds.) (2000). Principles of effective teaching in the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  44. Wilson, J. (2001). Methodological difficulties of assessing metacognition: A new approach. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 460 143.
  45. Zern, K. (2001). TAPPED IN's afterschool online program: Teacher professional development on the Internet. Retrieved December 17, 2007, from http://tappedin.org/tappedin/web/papers/2001/KimzernPaper.pdf

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Collaborative Annotated Bibliographies: An Online Strategy to Foster Student Collaboration and Understanding

    Mitchell Parkes, Gail Hawkes & Brian Landrigan, University of New England, Australia

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2013 (Jun 24, 2013) pp. 2205–2211

  2. Shared Photonarratives in an Online Master’s Course: Reflection, Context and Community

    Lauren Madden, The College of New Jersey, United States; M. Gail Jones & Margaret Blanchard, North Carolina State University, United States

    Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 13, No. 1 (March 2013) pp. 41–60

  3. Developing Digital-Age Teacher Competencies: Online Collaborative Instructional Design Teams

    Beth Bos & Kathryn Lee, Texas State University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (Mar 05, 2012) pp. 166–172

  4. A Diagnostic Mechanism and Tool for Analyzing Group Collaboration Problems with Online Group Work

    Shuangyan Liu & Mike Joy, Department of Computer Science, University of Warwick, United Kingdom

    E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2011 (Oct 18, 2011) pp. 2613–2618

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.