You are here:

The Relationship of E-Learner Satisfaction, E-Learning Self-Efficacy and Perceived Usefulness
PROCEEDINGS

, Alliant International University, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Honolulu, Hawaii, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-60-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Abstract

The attraction of utilizing technology to deliver knowledge is due to the immediate benefits associated with it. It is fast, cheap, and it gets the job done. Today, implementing e-learning is common practice in public and private sectors, but questions continue to emerge within the literature. “How do we determine the success of online learning?” Do we evaluate e-learning the same as traditional learning? Despite the amount of money invested in e-learning, organizations have not met the supposed economic gains. Consequently, continued research is needed to identify accurate evaluation measures for e-learning programs. The purpose of this study is to explore online learning theoretically and to identify key factors (e-learner satisfaction, perceived usefulness, and e-learning self-efficacy) that will enhance its effectiveness. Specifically, the research will explore the relationship of e-learner satisfaction, e-learning self-efficacy, and perceived usefulness. This paper presents results of a pilot survey administered to government employees who completed online mandatory courses.

Citation

Womble, J. (2006). The Relationship of E-Learner Satisfaction, E-Learning Self-Efficacy and Perceived Usefulness. In T. Reeves & S. Yamashita (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2006--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2494-2498). Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 21, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Adamson, I., & Shine, J. (2003, December). Extending the new technology acceptance model to measure the end user information systems satisfaction in a mandatory environment: A bank’s treasury. Technology Analysis& Strategic Management, 15(4), 441-455.
  2. American Psychological Association. (1997). Learner-centered psychological principles: A framework for school redesign and reform. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved August 8, 2006, from http://www.apa.org/ed/cpse/LCPP.pdf
  3. Anderson, K.C. (2005). The relationship of course relevance, online features, and perceived learner readiness with corporate employee satisfaction with eLearning. Dissertation Abstracts International, 66 (3), 966B. (UMI No. 3167658
  4. Baker, J. (2006). Stronge-learning growth among nonprofits. Retrieved July 2, 2006 from http://www.learningcircuits.org/news.html
  5. Bandura, A. (1994). Self Efficacy. Retrieved July 23, 2006 from http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/BanEncy.html
  6. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.
  7. Barron, A. (1998). Designing web-based training. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(4), 355-370 Biner, P.M. Dean, R.S., & Mellinger, A.E., (1994). Factors underlying distance learner satisfaction with televised college-level courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(1), 60-71.
  8. Bolliger, D.U., & Martindale, T. (2004). Key factors for determining student satisfaction in online courses. International Journal of E-Learning, 3(1), 61-67.
  9. Burkhardt, M.E., & Grass, D.J. (1990). Changing patterns or patterns of change: The effects of a change in technology on social network structure and power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 104-127.
  10. Carter, K. (2004). Online Training: What’s really working? Technology and Learning, (24)10, 32-37.
  11. Chute, A.G., Thompson, M.M., & Hancock, B.W. (1999). The McGraw-Hill handbook of distance learning. New York: McGraw
  12. Compeau, D.R., & Higgins, C.A. (1995, June). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
  13. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3),
  14. Davis, F.D. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machines, 38, 475-487.
  15. Downey, J. (2006) Measuring general computer self-efficacy: The surprising comparison of three instruments in predicting performance, attitudes, and usage. Proceedings of the 39t h Hawaii International Conference of System Sciences.P. 1-9. Retrieved August 1, 2006 from
  16. Harun, M.H. (2002). Integrating e-Learning into the workplace. The Internet and Higher Education, 4(3-4), 301-310.
  17. Kirk, J. (2002). E-learning: An executive summary. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service Accession No. ED461762). Western Carolina University, North Carolina, 1-14.
  18. Khorrami-Arani, O. (2001). Researching computer self-efficacy. International Education Journal. 2(4), 17-25.
  19. Jung, I., Choi, S., Lim, C., & Leem, J. (2002). Effects of different types of interactions on learning achievement, satisfaction and participation in web-based instruction. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 39(2), 153-162.
  20. Komras, H. (1985). Evaluating your training programs. Training and Development Journal, 39(9), 87-88.
  21. Kruse, K. (2006). Beginner basics: The benefits and drawbacks of e-Learning, Retrieved August 15, 2006 from http://www.e-learningguru.com/articles/art1_3.htm
  22. Murphy, C.A., Coover, D., & Owen, S.V. (1989). Development and validation of the Computer Self-Efficacy Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49(4), 893-899.
  23. Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. (2001). The science of training: A decade of progress. Annual Review of Psychology. 52, 471-499.
  24. Strother, J. (2002, April). An assessment of the effectiveness of e-learning incorporate training programs. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 3(1), 1-17.
  25. Tucker, M.A. (2005, October). E-learning evolves. HR Magazine, 50(10), 74-78.
  26. Wang, Y. (2003, October). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information& Management, 41(1), 75-86. Retrieved October 11, 2005, from http://www.sciencedirect.com
  27. Zimmerman, E. (2001, January). Better training is just a click away. Special Report: HR on the internet. Workforce. 36-32. Retrieved November 3, 2005, from http://www.workforce.com

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. The Navigation Experience in an Online Activity: Related Variables to User Satisfaction

    Pei-Chun Shih, Agustin Martinez-Molina & Dolores Muñoz, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Spain

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2008 (Jun 30, 2008) pp. 1484–1493

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.