You are here:

Evaluating Computer Games: Use of an Appraisal Instrument Based on the Game Object Model
PROCEEDINGS

, Centre for IT in Higher Education (ITEd), South Africa

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Orlando, FL USA ISBN 978-1-880094-60-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

A research instrument (questionnaire), based on the Game Object Model (GOM), is used by a team (4 participants) to evaluate one educational and seven commercial computer video game reviewed by GameSpot to be the best PC games for 2004. GOM evaluations were different from GameSpot reviews and identified two groups of games. The highest scoring games included those that present players with realistic environments, include complex multifaceted characters, offer richly textured narratives and are complex (Myst IV, yKhozi, Half-Life 2 and Tiger Woods PGA Tour 2006). The other lower scoring group appears to support male fantasies (both erotic and authoritarian), inculcate self-discipline (especially through reflex), include control-and-monitoring (preparing workers for a global economy) and are gender exclusive (Warcraft III, Unreal Tournament 2004, The Sims 2 and Need for Speed Underground 2).

Citation

Amory, A. (2006). Evaluating Computer Games: Use of an Appraisal Instrument Based on the Game Object Model. In E. Pearson & P. Bohman (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2006--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 2242-2249). Orlando, FL USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 25, 2019 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References