Investigating the Impact of Embedded Questions in Online Presentations in a Hybrid Undergraduate Educational Psychology Course
PROCEEDING
Jane Kenney, Michelle Fisher, West Chester University of Pennsylvania, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Washington, DC ISBN 978-1-939797-29-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC
Abstract
The authors conducted a pilot study to investigate the impact of embedded questions in order to focus student attention and improve engagement when viewing online pre-recorded PowerPoint presentations. The study was conducted in a hybrid undergraduate, introductory, educational psychology course using survey results and student scores on the embedded questions. The relationship between scores on the embedded questions and online quiz scores and major exam scores will be discussed. The authors will share an overview of the hybrid course and some of the online presentations. Participants will be encouraged to share their experiences trying to increase student engagement with online learning materials.
Citation
Kenney, J. & Fisher, M. (2017). Investigating the Impact of Embedded Questions in Online Presentations in a Hybrid Undergraduate Educational Psychology Course. In J. Johnston (Ed.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2017 (pp. 850-853). Washington, DC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved June 25, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/178394/.
© 2017 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
References
View References & Citations Map- Cummins, S., Beresford, A., and Rice, A. (2016). Investigating engagement within-video quiz questions in a programming course. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 9(1), 57-66.
- Eggen, P. & Kauchak, D (2016). Educational psychology: Windows on classrooms (10 th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Education, Inc.
- Fulton, K. (2012). 10 reasons to flip. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 20-24.
- Herreid, C., & Schiller, N. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62-66.
- Johnson-Glenbert, M.C. (2010). Embedded formative e-assessment: Who benefits, who falters. Educational Media International, 47(2), 153-171. DOI:10.1080/09523987.2010.492681
- Lin, H. (2007). Blending online components into traditional instruction: A case of using technologies to support good practices in pre-service teacher education. Journal of Instructional Delivery Systems, 21(1), 7-16.
- Martyn, M. (2003). The hybrid online model: Good practice. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 1, 18-23.
- Picciano, A. (2006). Blended learning: Implications for growth and access. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(3), 95-102.
- Watson, J. (2008). Blended learning: The convergence of online and face-to-face education. VA: North American Council for Online Learning.
- Young, J. (2002). ‘Hybrid’ teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online instruction. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 48(28), 33-34.
- Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R.O., & Nunamker, J.F. (2006). Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information and Management, 43 (1), 15-27.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References
