An Investigation of Behaviorist and Cognitive Approaches to Instructional Multimedia Design
Patricia Deubel, Educational Consultant,Ohio, United States
Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia Volume 12, Number 1, ISSN 1055-8896 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Typically, guidelines for design of interactive multimedia systems have been based on intuitive beliefs of designers rather than being founded on relevant research and theory. As advances in technology create new opportunities for education, it is important to use a range of theoretical perspectives to optimize use of new technology in teaching and learning. This article explores behaviorist and cognitive approaches to interactive multimedia instructional design (ID). Basic concepts, characteristics of ID, and comparisons between each are discussed. Interface design guidelines for learning with multimedia are presented, which link theory with practice in effective multimedia ID. Universal Design for Learning is described, which sheds light on future research in ID to accommodate the diversity of learners. Major conclusions include that no one theoretical foundation exists for ID practice that is suitable for all applications. Dick and Carey's behaviorist model, Willis' constructivist model, Reigeluth's Elaboration Theory, Keller's ARCS model, Merrill's Instructional Transaction Theory, and Gagné's learning hierarchy illustrate the abundance of theoretical frameworks to assist designers in decision making. Theories continually evolve or are revised as a result of research or critique by designers or theorists in the field. In the long term a blending of behaviorist and cognitive approaches seems inevitable.
Deubel, P. (2003). An Investigation of Behaviorist and Cognitive Approaches to Instructional Multimedia Design. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 12(1), 63-90. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
© 2003 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact email@example.com.
Deborah LaPointe, Katherine Greysen & Kerrin Barrett
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 5, No. 1 (Apr 01, 2004)
Richard Guy, Heather Pisani, Peter Rich, Giovanni Mandarano, Cathy Leahy, Tom Molyneux & Rob Davidson, RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia, Australia
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2010 (Jun 29, 2010) pp. 293–298
Haido Samaras, Thanasis Giouvanakis, Despina Bousiou & Konstantinos Tarabanis, University of Macedonia, Greece
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2004 (2004) pp. 4285–4292
Kosuke Terashima, Kyoto University of Foreign Studies, Japan; Ryosuke Ikai & Yoshiyuki Yoshida, Graduate School of Kansai University, Japan; Mihoko Kamei & Kenichi Kubota, Kansai University, Japan
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2004 (2004) pp. 4049–4054
Mohammad Santally & Alain Senteni, VCILT, Mauritius
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2004 (2004) pp. 2900–2905
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.