You are here:

The Reciprocal Rights and Metacognitive Responsibility of Effective Digital Citizenships in Online Learning Environments
PROCEEDING

, , , Arkansas Tech University, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Washington, DC, United States Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of using educational videos in two different online discussion forums on students’ retention, transfer of knowledge and the overall quality of their discussion participation and metacognitive management of the process. The investigators employed mixed methods to examine the relationship between metacognitive strategies, academic performance, and learning modalities. The results revealed significant and positive correlation between students’ participating in the wiki discussion method and improved test scores, Furthermore, students’ reflections indicated that metacognitive strategies such as reflection, re-stating and re-teaching were important factors in helping them learn and apply the new material.

Citation

Watts, A., Ibrahim, M. & Toland, T. (2016). The Reciprocal Rights and Metacognitive Responsibility of Effective Digital Citizenships in Online Learning Environments. In Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning (pp. 508-516). Washington, DC, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 20, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Abar, B., & Loken, E. (2010). Self-regulated learning and self-directed study in a pre-college sample. Learning and individual differences, 20(1), 25-29.
  2. Cooper, G., & Sweller, J. (1987). Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problemsolving transfer. Journal of educational psychology, 79(4), 347.
  3. Efklides, A. (2008). Metacognition: Defining its facets and levels of functioning in relation to self-regulation and coregulation. European Psychologist, 13(4), 277-287.
  4. Efklides, A. (2011). Interactions of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 6-25.
  5. Ellis, A., Bond, J., & Denton, D. (2012). An analytical literature review of the effects of metacognitive teaching strategies in primary and secondary student populations. AsiaPacific Journal of Educational Development, 1(1), 9-23.
  6. Ferla, J., Valcke, M., & Schuyten, G. (2008). Relationships between student cognitions and their effects on study strategies. Learning and individual differences, 18(2), 271-278.
  7. Flavell, J. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. The nature of intelligence, 12, 231-235.
  8. Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906.
  9. Hacker, D., Bol, L., & Keener, M. (2008). Metacognition in education: A focus on calibration. Handbook of metamemory and memory, 429455.
  10. Hammann, L., & Stevens, R. (1998). Metacognitive Awareness Assessment in Self-Regulated Learning and Performance Measures in an Introductory Educational Psychology Course.
  11. Hollandsworth, R., Dowdy, L., & Donovan, J. (2011). Digital citizenship in K-12: It takes a village. TechTrends, 55(4), 37-47.
  12. Jones, L.M., Mitchell, K.J., & Finkelhor, D. (2012). Trends in youth internet victimization: Findings from three youth internet safety surveys 2000–2010.Journal of adolescent Health, 50(2), 179-186.
  13. Lenz, K., & Hughes, C. (1990). A word identification strategy for adolescents with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(3), 149-158.
  14. Lovett, M.C. (2008, January). Teaching metacognition. In Presentation to the Educause Learning Initiative Annual Meeting. Retrieved on September (Vol. 10, P. 2013).
  15. Mayer, R.E., Steinhoff, K., Bower, G., & Mars, R. (1995). A generative theory of textbook design: Using annotated illustrations to foster meaningful learning of science text. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(1), 31-41.
  16. McCann, E., & Garcia, T. (1999). Maintaining motivation and regulating emotion: Measuring individual differences in academic volitional strategies. Learning and individual differences, 11(3), 259-279.
  17. Ribble, M. (2015). Digital Citizenship in Schools: Nine Elements All Students Should Know. International Society for Technology in Education.
  18. Schraw, G., Crippen, K., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36(1-2), 111-139.
  19. Schraw, G., & Dennison, R.S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary educational psychology, 19(4), 460-475.
  20. Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351-371.
  21. Sweller, J., Chandler, P., Tierney, P., & Cooper, M. (1990). Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119(2), 176.Chandler, Paul, and John Sweller. "The split‐attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction." British Journal of Educational Psychology 62.2 (1992): 233-246.
  22. Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn.Cognition and instruction, 12(3), 185233.Zimmerman, B. (2000). Attaining Self-Regulation: a social cognitive perspective. Handbook of selfregulation, 13-39.
  23. Tarmizi, R.A., & Sweller, J. (1988). Guidance during mathematical problem solving. Journal of educational psychology, 80(4), 424.
  24. Ward, M., & Sweller, J. (1990). Structuring effective worked examples.Cognition and instruction, 7(1), 1-39.
  25. Zimmerman, B. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.