You are here:

Using Peer Review Approach to Promote Online Learning in Higher Education
PROCEEDING

, East Carolina University, United States ; , Murray state university, United States ; , , East Carolina University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Savannah, GA, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-13-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

In this pilot study a team of professionals from two different universities in two different states within the United States will explore and investigate peer review approach using online platform in online or distance education which might enhance student’s motivation. Initial stage of this pilot study will focus on three courses in two different state universities from east south-central region and east region of the United States using student’s engagement survey, satisfaction survey, and qualitative research. This proposed research will provide report for other faculty members in higher education who might consider using this approach in their online/distance education courses with suggested procedures and guidelines in their classrooms and this research will also display students’ perceptions of using peer review approach and their satisfaction as a foundation to seek the potential innovations in their classroom which might enhance their learning and engagement in the 21st century

Citation

Yeh, C.J., Singh, A., Blanchard, S. & Cudmore, C. (2016). Using Peer Review Approach to Promote Online Learning in Higher Education. In G. Chamblee & L. Langub (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 443-446). Savannah, GA, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 5, 2020 from .

References

View References & Citations Map

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References