You are here:

Assessing Elementary Prospective Teachers’ Mathematical Explanations After Engagement in Online Mentoring Modules
article

, Northwest Missouri State University, United States ; , West Virginia University, United States ; , Utah State University, United States

CITE Journal Volume 16, Number 4, ISSN 1528-5804 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

Prospective elementary teachers at three universities engaged in online modules called the Virtual Field Experience, created by the Math Forum. The prospective teachers learned about problem solving and mentoring elementary students in composing solutions and explanations to nonroutine challenge problems. Finally, through an asynchronous online environment, the prospective teachers mentored elementary students. The researchers assessed the prospective teachers’ solutions and explanations to problems at the beginning of the semester, at the middle of the semester after completing the training in mentoring, and again at the end of the semester after the mentoring was completed. The researchers observed improvements in the prospective teachers’ abilities to write explanations to problems. Specifically, growth was seen in prospective teachers’ communication of their explanations and their ability to construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others (Common Core State Standards Initiative, 2010, Standard for Mathematical Practice 3), and attend to precision (Standard for Mathematical Practice 6).

Citation

Wall, J., Selmer, S. & Bingham Brown, A. (2016). Assessing Elementary Prospective Teachers’ Mathematical Explanations After Engagement in Online Mentoring Modules. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 16(4), 373-414. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved March 26, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Allen, I., & Seaman, J. (2008). Staying the course: Online education 2008. Boston, MA: The Sloan Consortium.
  2. Borba, M., & Llinares, S. (2012). Online mathematics teacher education: Overview of an emergent field of research. ZDM Mathematics Education, 44, 697-704. in Technology and Teacher Education, 16(4)
  3. Cohen, A. (2011, October). Evoking effective mathematical practices. Slides presented at the Enacting the CCSSM Standards of Mathematical Practices Conference, Lincoln, NE. Retrieved from http://scimath.unl.edu/conferences/esmp2011/documents/Evoking%20Effective%20Mathematical%20Practices.pdf
  4. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Mathematics standards. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/Math/
  5. Cuoco, A., Goldenberg, E.P., & Mark, J. (2010). Contemporary curriculum issues: Organizing a curriculum around mathematical habits of mind. Mathematics Teacher, 103(9), 682-688.
  6. De Young, M., & Fung, M.G. (2004). Online mentoring with the Math Forum: A capstone experience for preservice K-8 teachers in a mathematics content problem-solving class. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4(3), 363-375.
  7. Hogan, M., & Alejandre, S. (2010). Problem solving: It has to begin with noticing and wondering. CMC ComMuniCator, 35(2), 31-33.
  8. Levasseur, K., & Cuoco, A. (2003). Mathematical habits of mind. In H.L. Schoen (Ed.), Teaching mathematics through problem solving: Grade 6-12 (pp. 23-37). Reston,
  9. Mark, J., Cuoco, A., Goldenberg, P., & Sword, S. (2010). Developing mathematical habits of mind. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 15(9). 505-509.
  10. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
  11. Rathouz, M.M. (2009). Support preservice teachers’ reasoning and justification. Teaching Children Mathematics. 16(4), 214-221.
  12. Ray, M. (2013). Powerful problem solving. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  13. Russell, S. (2012). CCSSM: Keeping teaching and learning strong. Teaching Children Mathematics, 19(1), 50-56.
  14. Stevens, G., Cuoco, A., Harvey, W., Matsuura, R., Rosenberg, S., & Sword, S. (2007, May). The impact of immersion in mathematics on teachers. Paper presented at the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute (MSRI), Berkeley, CA. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 16(4)
  15. Wall, J., Brown, A., & Selmer, S. (2014). Elementary prospective teachers' mathematical justifications through online mentoring modules. In M. Searson& M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2014 (pp. 490-493). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.