You are here:

Research Highlights in Technology and Teacher Education 2014 EBOOK

, University of Nevada, Reno, United States ; , simSchool & SITE, United States

Research Highlights in Technology and Teacher Education 2014. Published . ISBN 978-1-9397-9710-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC.

Abstract

Research Highlights in Technology and Teacher Education is now in its sixth year of publication, and has become
one of the most important publications of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education (SITE).
This series of books represent the best of the scholarship offered at the SITE international conference, this year held
in Jacksonville, Florida and featuring about 1000 scholars and educators from nearly 60 countries.

Citation

Liu, L. & Gibson, D. (Eds.). (2014). Research Highlights in Technology and Teacher Education 2014. Waynesville, NC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved October 21, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Bellini, S., & Akullian, J. (2007). A meta-analysis of video modeling and video self modeling interventions for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Exceptional Children, 73, 264-287.
  2. Bellini, S., Akullian, J., & Hopf, A. (2007). Increasing social engagement in young children with autism spectrum disorders using video self modeling. School Psychology Review, 36, 80-90.
  3. Bellini, S., Peters, J.K., Benner, L., & Hopf, A. (2007). A meta-analysis of school-based social skills interventions for children with autism spectrum disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 28, 153-162.
  4. Bock, S.J., Bakken, J.P., & Kempel-Michalak, N. (2009). Behavioral interventions for children and youth with autism spectrum disorders. In a handbook for teachers:Teaching students with autism in the general education classroom (pp. 109-141).Waco, Texas: Prufrock Press, Inc.
  5. Buggey, T. (2005). Video self modeling applications with students with autism spectrum disorder in a small private school setting. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 52-64.
  6. Buggey, T. (2007). A picture is worth–Video self-modeling applications at school and home. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9, 151-158.
  7. Buggey, T. (2009). Seeing is believing: Video self-modeling for people with autism and other developmental disabilities. Bethesda, MD: Woodbine House.
  8. Buggey, T. & Ogle, L. (2012). Video self-modeling. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 52-70.
  9. Cameron, D., Cook, B.G., & Tankersley, M. (2012). An analysis of the different patterns of 1:1 interactions between educational professionals and their students with varying abilities in inclusive classrooms. International Journal Of Inclusive Education, 16(12), 1335-1354.
  10. Charlop-Christy, M.H., Le, L., & Freeman, K.A. (2000). A comparison of video modeling within vivo modeling
  11. Dowrick, P.W., & Raeburn, J. (1977). Video editing and medication to produce a therapeutic self-model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45,129, 1156Œ1158.
  12. Dunlap, G., & Johnson, J. (1985). Increasing the independent responding of autistic children with unpredictable supervision.
  13. Hitchcock, C.H., Dowrick, P.W., & Prater, M.A. (2003). Video self-modeling intervention in school-based settings: A review. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 36-45.
  14. Hume, K., Loftin, R., & Lanz, J. (2009). Increasing independence in autism spectrum disorders: a review of three focused interventions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 1329-1338.
  15. Maione, L., & Mirenda, P. (2006). Effects of video modeling and video feedback on peer-directed social language of a child with autism. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 8, 106-118.
  16. McCoy, K., & Hermansen, E. (2007). Video modeling for individuals with autism: a review of model types and effects. Education and Treatment of Children, 30, 183-213.
  17. Nikopoulos, C.K. & Keenan, M. (2003). Promoting social initiation in children with autism using video modeling. Behavioral Interventions, 18, 87-108.
  18. Prater, C.A., Carter, N., Hitchcock, C., & Dowrick, P. (2012). Video self-modeling to improve academic performance: A literature review. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 71-81.
  19. Ravet, J. (2011). Inclusive/exclusive? Contradictory perspectives on autism and inclusion: the case for an integrative position. International Journal Of Inclusive Education, 15, 667-682.
  20. Balfanz, R., Herzog, L., & MacIver, D.J. (2007). Preventing student disengagement and keeping students on the graduation path in urban middle-grades shools: Early identification and effective interventions. Educational Psychologist, 42(4), 223-235.
  21. Barnett, R. (2012). Learning for an unknown future. Higher Education Researh and Development, 31(1), 65-77.
  22. Barton, P.E. (2005). One-third of a nation: Rising dropout rates and declining opportnities (pp. 1-47): Policy
  23. Ertmer, P.A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T. (2010). Teacher technology change:
  24. Hanushek, E.A., & Rivkin, S.G. (2010). Generalizations about using value-added measures of teacher quality. American Economic Review, 100(May), 267-271.
  25. Henry, K.L., Knight, K.E., & Thornberry, T.P. (2012). School disengagement as a predictor of dropout, deinquency, and problem substance use during adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(2), 156-166.
  26. Herman, J., & Linn, R. (2013). On the road to assessing deeper learning: The status of Smarter Balanced and
  27. Hwang, G.-J., Kuo, F.-R., Yin, P.-Y., & Chuang, K.-H. (2010). A heuristic algorithm for planning personalized learning paths for context-aware ubiquitous learning. Computers and Education, 54(2), 404-415.
  28. Lieszkovszky, I. (2012). State Impact: What's coming up in Ohio education in 2013.
  29. Williams, R., Karousou, R., & Mackness, J. (2011). Emergent learning and learning ecologies in Web 2.0.
  30. Storytelling (2010), the major components of a digital story have been rationalized in fiThe Seven
  31. Frazel, M. (2010). Digital storytelling guide for educators. Washington DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
  32. Jakes, D.S. (2005). Capturing stories, capturing lives: An introduction to digital storytelling. Retrieved January 16, 2011, from http://www.jakesonline.org/dstory_ice.pdf
  33. Jonassen, D., Peck, K. & Wilson, B. (1999). Learning with technology:
  34. Kogo, C. & Suzuki, K. (2000). An analysis of the structure of course evaluation items based on ARCS motivation model (2).
  35. Susono, H., Kagami, A., Ikawa, T. & Shimomura, T. (2010). Online videos that teach digital storytelling to Japanese students and teachers. Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, 2010, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Chesapeake, VA. 3929-3931.
  36. Suzuki, K., Nishibuchi, A., Yamamoto, M. & Keller, J.M. (2004). Development and evaluation of Website to check instructional design based on the ARCS Motivation Model. Journal of the Japanese Society for Information and Systems in Education, 2(1), 63-69.
  37. Xu, Y., Park, H., & Baek, Y. (2011). A New Approach Toward Digital Storytelling: An Activity Focused on Writing Self efficacy in a Virtual Learning Environment. Educational Technology& Society, 14 (4), 181Œ191.
  38. Yu, C. & Robin, B. (2010). An action research: When digital storytelling meets forensic science education in an online learning environment. Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference, 2010, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Chesapeake, VA. 1234-1239.
  39. Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  40. Deng, L., & Yuen, A.H.K. (2011). Towards a framework for educational affordances of blogs. Computers& Education, 56(2), 441Œ451. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.
  41. Du, H.S., & Wagner, C. (2007). Learning With Weblogs: Enhancing Cognitive and Social Knowledge Construction. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 50(1), 1Œ16.
  42. Farrell, T.S.C. (2004). Reflective practice in action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  43. Gall, M.D., Borg, W.R., & Gall, J.P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction. White Plains, NY: Longman.
  44. Hall, H., & Davison, B. (2007). Social software as support in hybrid learning environments: The value of the blog as a tool for reflective learning and peer support. Library& Information Science Research, 29(2), 163Œ187.
  45. Hourigan, T., & Murray, L. (2010). Using Blogs to Help Language Students to Develop Reflective Learning Strategies: Towards a Pedagogical Framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2), 209Œ225.
  46. Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Haag, B.B. (1995). Constructivism and computer mediated communication in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 7-26.
  47. Kerawalla, L., Minocha, S., Kirkup, G., & Conole, G. (2009). An empirically grounded framework to guide blogging in higher education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(1), 31Œ42.
  48. Luehmann, A.L. (2008). Using blogging in support of teacher professional identity development: A case study. The Journal of the learning Sciences, 17, (3), 287-337.
  49. Marshall, C. & Rossman, G.B. (1995). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  50. Martin, A. (2004). Can™t anybody count? Counting as an epistemic theme in the history of human chromosomes. Social Studies of Science, 34, pp. 923-948.
  51. Miller, W., & Williams, R.M. (2013). Pre-service teachers and blogs: An invitation to extended reflection and conversation. Art Education, 66(3), 47-52.
  52. Sakr, M. (2012). "Wrighting" the self: New technologies and textual subjectivities. Learning, Media and Technology, 37(1), 119123.
  53. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  54. Xie, Y., Ke, F., & Sharma, P. (2008). The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college students™ reflective learning processes. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(1), 18Œ25. \x0c111
  55. Akpinar, Y. (2003). Ö retmenlerin yeni bilg i teknolojileri kullan õmõnda yüksekö retimin etkisi: stanbul okullar õ örne i (The effect of higher education
  56. Albirini, A. (2006). Teachers™ attitudes toward information and communication technologies: The case of Syrian EFL teachers. Computers and Education, 47, 373-398.
  57. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, USA.
  58. Blease, D. & Cohen, L. (1990). Coping with computers: An ethnographic study in primary classes. Paul Chapman Educational Publishing. Ennis, C.D., Cothran, D.J., &
  59. Loftus, S.J. (1992). The influence of teachers' educational beliefs on their knowledge organization. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 30, 73Œ86.
  60. Ertmer, P.A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25Œ39. Ertmer, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2010). Teacher technology change: Ho
  61. Haney, J.J., Lumpe, A.T., Czerniak, C.M., & Egan, V. (2002). From beliefs to actions: The beliefs and actions of teachers implementing change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13, 171-187. Hannaford, M.E. (1998). Teacher attitudes toward computer use in the classroom. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the
  62. Koklu O. (2012). Developing a belief scale related to computer assisted instruction. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 4(3), 1741-1752.
  63. Koray, O. (2011). The effectiveness of problem-based learning supported with computer simulations on academic performance about buoyancy. Energy Education Scienc
  64. Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 317Œ328.
  65. Novek, E.M. (1999). Do professors dream of electronic students? Faculty anxiety and the new information technologies. Paper presented at the Eastern Communication Association Annual Meeting.
  66. Oliver, J.S., & Koballa, T. (1992). Science educators™ use of the concept of belief. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching, Boston, MA.
  67. Pajares, M.F. (1992). Teacher beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307Œ332.
  68. Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. Routledge, London.
  69. Tas, E. (2011). A new web designed material approach on learning and assessment in science education. Energy Education Science Technology Part B. 3, 567Œ578.
  70. Tondeur, J., Hermans, R., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). Exploring the link between teachers™ educational belief profiles and different types of computer use in the classroom. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2541Œ2553.
  71. Yang, S.C. & Huang, Y.F. (2008). A study of high school English teachers' behavior, concerns and beliefs in integrating information technology into English instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 1085Œ1103. \x0c120 \x0c121 Developing anOpen Online Course for Teachers andStudent Teachers Louise Mifsud louise.Mifsud@hioa.no Tonje Hilde Giæver tonje.H.giaever@hioa.no Vibeke Bjarnø Vibeke.Bjarno@hioa.no Eli Gjølstad Eli.Gjolstad@hioa.no Irene Beyer-Log irene-beyer.log@hioa.no Faculty of Education, Oslo and Akershus University, Norway Abstract: In this paper, we describe and analyze the process of developing an open and flexible
  72. Framework for Basic Skills (2012) emphasize this. Therefore, the need to increase students™ and teachers™ competence in digital literacy can be described as being rooted in the notion of fiwhat counts as
  73. Bjarnø, V. (2008). Oslomodellen: Integrering av IKT i allmennlærerut
  74. Engen, B.K., & Øgrim, L. (2009). Integrating ICT without throwing the baby out with the bathwater. In: Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning inCorporate, Governme
  75. Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Kärkkäinen, M. (1995). Polyc ontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: Learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learning and Instruction, 5, 319-336.
  76. Engström, Y. (1996). Developmental work research as educational research. Looking ten years back and into the zone of proximal development. Nordisk pedagogikk, 16 (3). Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & P unamäki-Gitai, R.-L. (Eds.). (1999).
  77. Jahreie, C.F. (2010). Learning to teach: An activity theoretical study
  78. Ludvigsen, S. (2011). What counts as knowledge: Learning to use categories in computer environments. Learning, Media and Technology. DOI:10.1080/17439884.2011.573149.
  79. Tyner, K. (1998). Literacy in a digital world: Teaching and learning in the age of information. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  80. Wertsch, J.V. (1981). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe. \x0c131
  81. Anderson, C., Beard, M., & Bergstrand Othman, L. (2011). Pre-Service teacher survey and collaboration between the United States and Jordan. In M. Koehler& P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2011 (2833-2840). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Apple Education-iPad makes the perfect learning companion. (N.D.). Apple. Retrieved October 4, 2013, from http://www.apple.com/education/ipad/ Banister, S. (2010). Integrating the iPod Touch in K-12 education: Visions and vices. Computers in the Schools, 27(2), 121-131.
  82. Blackbourn, J.M., Fillingim, J.G., McCelland, S., Elrod, G., Franklin Medley, M.B., Kritsonis, M.A., & Ray, J. (2008). The use of warless technology to augment problem-based learning in special education preservice teachers. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 35(2), 169-176.
  83. Boyd, A.W. (2011, September 11). Adapting to the iPad, called education's 'equalizer'. USA Today. Retrieved October 4, 2013, from http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/health/wellness/special-needs/story/2011-0911/Adapting-to-the-iPad-called-educations-equalizer/50362426/1
  84. Cornell, R. (1999). Paradigms for the new millennium: How professors will certainly change? Educational Media International, 36(2), 89-96.
  85. Dexter, S., & Riedel, E. (2003). Why improving preservice teacher educati
  86. Florida Center for Instructional Technology (2011). Technology Integration Matrix. Retrieved from http://fcit.usf.edu/matrix/. Fleming, L., Motamedi, V., & May, L. (2007). Predicting pre-service teacher competence in computer technology:
  87. Geist, E. (2011). The game changer: Using iPads in college teacher education classes. College Student Journal, 45(4), 758-768. \x0c137 Harmon, J. (N.D.) Unlocking literacy with iPad. Retrieved May 9, 2014 from http://www.throughstudentseyes.org/ipads/unlocking_ Literacy_with_ipad/ipads_files/unlocking_literacy_ip
  88. International Society for Technology in Education (2008). ISTE standards for teachers. Retrieved from http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/nets-t-standards.pdf?sfvrsn=2 Johnson, B. (2011, October 31). Teaching and Learning: Using iPads in the Classroom. Edutopia K-12 Education&
  89. McPherson, S., Wang, S., Hsu, J., & Tsuei, M. (2007). New literacies instruction in teaching, TechTrends, 51(5), 2431.
  90. Melhuish, K. & Falloon, G. (2010). Looking to the future: M-learning with iPad, Computers in New Zealand Schools, 22(3). Retrieved 9/20/2013 from http://education2x.otago.ac.nz/cinzs/mod/resource/view.php?id=114 Murphy, G. (2011). Post-PC devices: A summary of early iPad technology adoption in tertiary environments. E-Journal of Business Education& Scholarship of Teaching, 5, 1, 18-32.
  91. Nedungadi, P. & Raman, R. (2012). A new approach to personalization: integrating e-learning and m-learning, Education Tech Research Development 60, 659-678.
  92. Owen, P. (2011). IPads, not chalkboards. Retrieved 9/20/2013 from http://www.telegram.com/article/20111125/NEWS/111259786/1246 Peluso, D.C. (2012). The fast-paced iPad revolution: Can educators stay up to date and relevant about these ubiquitous devices?
  93. Raggi, V.L. & Chronis, A.M. (2006). Interventions to address the academic impairment of children and adolescents with ADHD. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 9(1), 85-111.
  94. Rapp, W.H. (2005). Using assistive technology with students with exceptional learning needs: When does an aid become a crutch? Reading& Writing Quarterly, 21(2), 193-196.
  95. Rose, M. (2011, September 18). IPad-enabled students get performance boost, says ACU study| TUAW-the unofficial Apple weblog. TUAW-The Unofficial Apple Weblog. Retrieved October 4, 2013, from http://www.tuaw.com/2011/09/18/ip Ad-enabled-students-get-perfo
  96. Williams, M.K., Foulger, T.S., & Wetzel, K. (2009). Preparing preservice teachers for 21 st century classrooms: Transforming attitudes and behaviors about innovative technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(3), 393-4.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

  1. Forward 5
  2. Preface 7

TPACK AND PRESERVICE EDUCATION

  1. The Construct is in the Eye of the Beholder: School Districts’ Appropriations and Reconceptualizations of TPACK 11
    Judi Harris and Mark Hofer (USA)
  2. Preparing Special Education Teachers to Teach Mathematics and Science with Technology: A Study of Teachers’ Surveys and Lesson Plans 19
    Irina Lyublinskaya and Nelly Tournaki (USA)
  3. Mathematical Content, Pedagogy, and Technology: What It Can Mean to Practicing Teachers 27
    Beth Bos and Kathryn Lee (USA)
  4. Designing an Educational Technology Course for Preservice Social Studies Teachers Based on Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) Survey Results 35
    Mark Hart and Swapna Kumar (USA)
  5. Impact of Design Teams on Preservice Teachers’ TPACK, Attitudes, & Skills 43
    Laurene Johnson (USA)
  6. A Systems Approach for Integrating Multiple Technologies as Important Pedagogical Tools for TPACK 51
    Henry Gillow-Wiles and Margaret L. Niess (USA)

ASSESSMENT

  1. Assessment-Talks and Talking about Assessment: Negotiations of Multimodal Texts at the Boundary 59
    Anna-Lena Godhe and Berner Lindström (Sweden)
  2. From Creation to Curation: Evolution of an Authentic ‘Assessment for Learning’ Task 69
    Peter R Albion (Australia)

RESEARCH ON LEARNING

  1. Video Self Modeling via iPods: The Road to Independent Task Completion 79
    Julie Bucalos, Debra Bauder and Anne Bucalos (USA)
  2. Using Digital Resources to Support Personalized Learning Experiences in K-12 Classrooms: The Evolution of Mobile Devices as Innovations in Schools 85
    Savilla Banister and Rachel Vannatta Reinhart (USA)
  3. The Impact of a Digital Storytelling Assignment on Non-English-Major-Students’ Motivation for Learning English in a Japanese University 91
    Naoko Kasami (Japan)

RESEARCH ON TEACHING

  1. Psychosocial and Cognitive Dimensions of the ‘Self’ within Pre-service Teachers’ Reflective Blogs 101
    Shaunna Smith and Rubén Garza (USA)
  2. Patterns of Mathematics Teachers' Characteristics and Beliefs about Computer Use in Education: A Cluster Analytic Approach 111
    Onder KOKLU (Turkey), Elizabeth Jakubowski (USA), Tayfun SERVI(Turkey) and Jiajing Huang (USA)
  3. Guiding Preservice Teacher Candidates to Implement Student-Centered Applications of Technology in the Classroom 131
    Christine J. Anderson and Laura Kieran (USA)