You are here:

Case studies to lead good practice for K-12 distance education
PROCEEDINGS

, , , , Iowa State University Center for Technology in Learning and Teaching, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Atlanta, GA, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-52-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Full Text

Abstract

This poster will present case studies on the intersection of practical laboratory-type activities and virtual high schools. It is intended to provide research base for the development, implementation, and evaluation of online learning for the Iowa Learning Online project and for others interested in developing online High School courses. Specifically, this presentation will describe case studies of how developers have included practical activities for distance education courses. Implications will be tied to preservice and inservice teacher education relative to flexible and distance learning.

Citation

Davis, N., Niederhauser, D., Compton, L. & Sahin, S. (2004). Case studies to lead good practice for K-12 distance education. In R. Ferdig, C. Crawford, R. Carlsen, N. Davis, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2004--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 404-406). Atlanta, GA, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 15, 2019 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Choi, B.S., Gennaro, E. (1987). The effectiveness of using computer simulated experiments on junior high students’ understanding of the volume displacement concept. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching, 24(6), 539552.
  2. 80.Davis, N., Nilakanta, R. (2003). Quality@ a distance education includes preservice teachers: one democratic approach. In Stacey, E., Brown, G. (Eds.). Quality Education@ A Distance. Kluwer Press, Amsterdam.
  3. Kennepohl, D. (2001). Using computer simulations to supplement teaching laboratories in chemistry for distance delivery. Journal Of Distance Education, 16(2), 58-65.
  4. Lavoe. D.R., Good. R. (1988). The nature and use of prediction skills in a biological computer simulation. Journal Of Research In Science Teaching, 25(5), 335-360.
  5. Lazarowitz, R., Huppert, J. (1993). Science process skills of 10th-grade biology students in a computerassisted learning setting. Journal Of Computing In Education, 25(3), 366-382.
  6. Lunette, V.N., Hofstein, A. (1981). Simulations in science education.
  7. Mintz, R. (1993). Computerized simulation as an inquiry tool. School Science and Mathematics, 93(2), 76 DASHDASH
  8. Thomas, R., & Hooper, E. (1991). Simulations: An opportunity we are missing. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23(4), 497-513 Vail, K. (September 2002). A new kind of school. American School Board Journal. [On-line]. Available: http://www.ccswebacademy.net/American%20School%20Board/page1.htm
  9. Walling D.R. (ed) (2003) Virtual schooling. Issues in the development of e-learning policy. Phi Delta Kappa Edcuaitonal Foundation, Bloomington, IA.
  10. Weller, H.G. (1996). Assessing the impact of computer based learning in science. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28(4), 461-485.
  11. Windschitl, M.A. (1998). A practical guide for incorporating computer-based simulations into science instruction. The American Biology Teacher, 60(2), 92-97.
  12. Zucker A., Kozma R., Yarnall L., Marder C and Associates (2003) The virtual High School. Teaching Generation V. Teachers College Press, New York. Acknowledgement This project is supported by the Roy J. Carver Charitable Trust and Iowa Public TV.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References