You are here:

Utilization of a Learning Management System
PROCEEDINGS

, University of North Texas, United States

  • Full Text
  • Citation
  • Save to Collections
  • E-mail
  • Share
  • OpenURL

    • Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Jacksonville, Florida, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-07-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

    Abstract

    Middle school can be a challenging time in the development of students academically. The middle school age group is where students often start to fall behind and are unable to catch up. In an effort to better meet the needs of the middle school student, this article explores the classroom technique of using a Learning Management System to help all middle school students reach a level of independence in their coursework that will aid in their success throughout their academic career.

    Citation

    Stansell, A. (2014). Utilization of a Learning Management System. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2014--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 470-474). Jacksonville, Florida, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved April 24, 2019 from .

    © 2014 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

    Keywords

    View References & Citations Map

    References

    1. Ash, B.P., & Auria, J.D. (2013). Blueprint for a learning system. Learning Forward, 34(3), 42–47.
    2. Esperance, M.E.L., Lenker, E., Bullock, A., Lockamy, B., & Mason, C. (2013). Creating a middle grades environment that significantly improves student achievement. Middle School journal, May, 32–40.
    3. Feiertag, J., & Berge, Z.L. (2008). Training generation n: how educators should approach the Net Generation. Education& Training, 50(6), 457–464. ground in the middle grades: Why some schools do better. (2010). The Education Digest, 76(2), 14-18.
    4. Ion, A. (2012). Compared analysis of representative learning and content management systems used in education. Informatica Economica, 16(1), 123–132. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1017921375? Accountid=7113
    5. Jabr, M.A., & Al-omari, H.K. (2010). E-learning management system using service oriented architecture. Computer Science, 6(3), 285–295.
    6. Killian, J.N. (2011). The Teaching/Learning of Digital Natives. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 21(1), 7–10.
    7. Klobas, J.E., & McGill, T.J. (2010). The role of involvement in learning management system success. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 22(2), 114–134. Doi:10.1007/s12528-010-9032-5
    8. Liu, O.L. (2009). Evaluation of a learning strategies scale for middle school students. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27(4), 312–322.
    9. Lea, S., Stephenson, D., & Troy, J. (2003). Higher education students’ attitudes to student-centred learning: beyond'educational bulimia'? Studies in Higher Education, 28(3).
    10. Lonn, S., & Teasley, S. (2009). Saving time or innovating practice: investigating perceptions and uses of learning management systems. Computers& Education, 53(3), 686–694. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131509001006 Male, M. (2003). Technology for inclusion, meeting the special needs of all students. Boston, MA. Pearson Education Group, Inc.
    11. Manning, M. (2000). Benchmarks for student-friendly middle schools. Education Digest, 71(I), 5–8. Retrieved from https://libproxy.library.unt.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/233026254?accountid=7113 Matulich, E., Papp, R. & Haytko, D. (2008). Continuous improvement with teaching innovations: a requirement for today’s learners. Marketing Education Review, 18, pp. 1-7.
    12. Mccombs, B.L., & Vakili, D. (2005). A learner-centered framework for e-learning. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1582–1600. Doi:10.1111/J.1467-9620.2005.00534.x
    13. Moore, K., & Iida, S. (2010). Students’ perception of supplementary, online activities for Japanese language learning: Groupwork, quiz and discussion tools. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(7), 966–979.
    14. Moskal, P., Dziuban, C., & Hartman, J. (2013). Blended learning: A dangerous idea? The Internet and Higher Education, 18, 15–23. Doi:10.1016/J.iheduc.2012.12.001
    15. Paré, M. (2012). Inclusion of students with disabilities in the age of technology: The need for human rights guidance. Education Law Journal, 22(1), 39-61. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1243372791?accountid=7113 Pergola, T.M., & Walters, L.M. (2011). Evaluating web-based learning systems. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 5, 1-17. Https://libproxy.library.unt.edu/login?
    16. Skiba, D., & Barton, A. (2006). Adapting your teaching to accommodate the net generation of learners. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 11(2). U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2010). Transforming American education: learning powered by technology. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/sites/default/files/NETP-2010-finalreport.pdf
    17. Williams, C.W., & Hounshell, P. (1998). Teaching strategies for challenged students. The Science Teacher, 65(1), 29–31. Retrieved from https://libproxy.library.unt.edu/login? url= http://search.proquest.com/docview/214626069?accountid=7113

    These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

    Also Read

    Related Collections