You are here:

Cognitive strategies for learning from static and dynamic visuals
ARTICLE

Learning and Instruction Volume 13, Number 2, ISSN 0959-4752 Publisher: Elsevier Ltd

Abstract

An experimental study with 60 students investigated the effects of including static or dynamic visuals in an expository text on a learning outcome and the use of learning strategies while working with those visuals. For the study, two illustrated and one text-only version of a computer-based learning text on an astrophysical subject were developed and served as the learning material. Considering the cognitive task demand in a learning test, we found significant differences between the illustrated versions and the text-only version, but not between the two illustrated ones. We used think-aloud protocols to examine the learning processes initiated by both types of visuals. The coding of the recorded learning activities was based on recent theories of learning strategies. The results for both types of illustrations indicate different frequencies in the use of learning strategies relevant for the learning outcome, and therefore indicate the contribution of the cognitive process quality for the supportive function of visuals.

Citation

Lewalter, D. (2003). Cognitive strategies for learning from static and dynamic visuals. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 177-189. Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved April 24, 2019 from .

This record was imported from Learning and Instruction on January 29, 2019. Learning and Instruction is a publication of Elsevier.

Full text is availabe on Science Direct: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00019-1

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Multimedia Presentations of Mitosis: An Examination of Split-Attention, Modality, Redundancy, and Cueing

    Michelle Cook & Ryan Visser, Clemson University, United States

    Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia Vol. 23, No. 2 (April 2014) pp. 145–162

  2. Animation Induced Metacognitive Illusions

    Eugene Paik, none, United States

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2012 (Jun 26, 2012) pp. 973–980

  3. Should Multimedia Instruction be Easier to Understand? Implications of Animation Induced Illusion of Understanding

    Eugene Paik, none, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 (Mar 05, 2012) pp. 748–751

  4. Designing Multimedia Learning Environments Using Learning Object Technology

    Haido Samaras, Despina Bousiou, Thanasis Giouvanakis & Konstantinos Tarabanis, UoM, Greece

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2007 (Jun 25, 2007) pp. 3996–4004

  5. Broadening Established Theories of Multimedia Learning: An Extended Model of Multimedia Learning Design Based on Learning Object Technology

    Thanasis Giouvanakis, Haido Samaras, Despina Bousiou & Konstantinos Tarabanis, University of Macedonia, Greece

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2006 (June 2006) pp. 507–514

  6. A Framework for the Evaluation of Visual Languages for Instructional Design: the Case of E2ML

    Luca Botturi, NewMinE Lab - University of Lugano, Switzerland

    Journal of Interactive Learning Research Vol. 16, No. 4 (October 2005) pp. 329–351

  7. Learning with Technology: Cognitive Tools in Multimedia Learning Materials

    Kristian Kiili, Tampere University of Technology, Pori, Finland

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2004 (2004) pp. 1837–1842

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.