You are here:

Assessing Sense of Classroom Community in an Urban Community College Online Setting
PROCEEDINGS

, Tidewater Community College, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Montreal, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-46-4 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Abstract

A self-report survey (Sense of Classroom Community Index) was used to investigate the sense of classroom community in an urban online community college classroom. It was concluded that sense of community was affected by classroom setting (face-to-face or online) and that learning may be enhanced by increased interactions within the classroom.

Citation

Cadieux, C. (2002). Assessing Sense of Classroom Community in an Urban Community College Online Setting. In M. Driscoll & T. Reeves (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2002--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1261-1264). Montreal, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 16, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Arbaugh, J. B. (2000). How classroom environment and student engagement affect learning in Internet -based MBA courses. Business Communication Quarterly, 63(4), 9.
  2. Biner, P. M., Dean, R. S., & Mellinger, A. E. (1994). Factors underlying distance learner satisfaction with televised college -level courses. The American Journal of Distance Learning, 8(1), 60-71.
  3. Brandon, D. P., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1999). Collaborative learning and computer-supported groups. Communication Education, 48(2), 109-126.
  4. Bryk, A. S., & Driscoll, M. E. (1988). The high school as community: Contextual influences and consequences for students and teachers. Madison, WI: National Center on Effective Secondary Schools, University of Wisconsin.
  5. Dumont, R. A. (1996). Teaching and learning in cyberspace. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communica tion, 39(4), 192-204.
  6. Easterday, N. (1997). Distance education and two-year colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 21, 23-36.
  7. Fiebert, M. S. (1971). A scale to measure the social distance between college students and faculty. The Journal of Psychology, 77, 3-7.
  8. Flaherty, L. M., Pearce, K. J., & Rubin, R. R. (1998). Internet and face-t o-face communication: Not functional alternatives. Communication Quarterly, 46(3), 250-268.
  9. George, D. & Mallery, P. (2001). SPSS for Windows Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference, 10.0 update. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  10. Grossman, W. M. (1999). Online U. Scientific American, 281(July), 41.
  11. Hyatt, S. Y. (1992). Developing and managing a multi-modal distance learning program in the two- year college. Paper presented at the 14th Annual International Conference of the National Institute for Staff and Organizational Development of Teaching Excellence and Conference of Administrators, Austin, TX.
  12. Leidner, D. E., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (1995). The use of information technology to enhance management school education: A theoretical view. MIS Quarterly, 19, 265-291.
  13. McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of Community: A Definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(January), 6-23.
  14. Nixon, D. E. (1992). Simulteaching: Access to learning by means of interactive television. Community/Junior College Quarterly of Research and Practice, 16, 167-175.
  15. Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999). What's the difference? A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. Washington, D.C.: The Institute for Higher Education Policy.
  16. Rovai, A. P., Lucking, R., & Cristol, D. (2000). Sense of Classroom Community Index (SCCI). Unpublished.
  17. Rovai, A. P. (2001). Building classroom community at a distance: A case study. Educational Technology Research and Development Journal, 49(4), 33-49.
  18. Russell, T. L. (1999). The no significant difference phenomenon as reported in 355 research reports, summaries and papers: A comparative research annotated bibliography on technology for distance education. Raleigh: North Carolina State University.
  19. Stokes, S. P. (2001). Satisfaction of college students with the digital learning environment: Do learners' temperaments make a difference? The Internet and Higher Education, 4, 31-44.
  20. Tallman, F.D. (1994). Satisfaction and completion in correspondence study: the influence of instructional and student -support services. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(2), 43-57.
  21. U.S. Department of Education (2002). The Digest of Education Statistics: Projections of Education Statistics to 2008. National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved February 1, 2002 from http://nces.ed.gov .
  22. Warkentin, M. E., Sayeed, L., & Hightower, R. (1997). Virtual teams versus face-t o-face teams: An exploratory study of a webbased conference system. Decision Sciences, 28(4), 975-996.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.