You are here:

Representing the Learning Design of Units of Learning
ARTICLE

,

Journal of Educational Technology & Society Volume 7, Number 3, ISSN 1176-3647 e-ISSN 1176-3647

Abstract

In order to capture current educational practices in eLearning courses, more advanced “learning design” capabilities are needed than are provided by the open eLearning specifications hitherto available. Specifically, these fall short in terms of multi-role workflows, collaborative peer-interaction, personalization and support for learning services. We present a new specification that both extends and integrates current specifications to support the portable representation of units of learning (e.g. lessons, learning events) that have advanced learning designs. This is the Learning Design specification. It enables the creation of a complete, abstract and portable description of the pedagogical approach taken in a course, which can then be realized by a conforming system. It can model multi-role teaching-learning processes and supports personalization of learning routes. The underlying generic pedagogical modelling language has been translated into a specification (a standard developed and agreed upon by domain and industry experts) that was developed in the context of IMS, one of the major bodies involved in the development of interoperability specifications in the field of eLearning. The IMS Learning Design specification is discussed in this article in the context of its current status, its limitations and its future development. (Contains 3 figures.)

Citation

Koper, R. & Olivier, B. (2004). Representing the Learning Design of Units of Learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 7(3), 97-111. Retrieved March 26, 2019 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on April 19, 2013. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Dialogic learning and interactive groups: an IMS LD template integrated in runtime systems

    Mar Pérez-Sanagustín, Davinia Hernández-Leo, Patricia Santos, Sergio Sayago & Josep Blat, Universitat Pompeu Fabra; D. Griffiths, University of Bolton

    International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) Vol. 3, No. 2008 (Jul 16, 2008)

  2. Mobile authoring of open educational resources as reusable learning objects

    Kinshuk & Ryan Jesse

    The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 14, No. 2 (May 09, 2013) pp. 28–52

  3. An Investigation of Tradeoffs between Techniques to Support User-centred Evaluations of Adaptive Game-based Learning Systems

    Catherine Mulwa & Donal Fitzpatrick, Dublin City University, Ireland; Vincent Wade, Adapt Centre, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland

    Global Learn 2016 (Apr 28, 2016) pp. 252–261

  4. Eduonto: an ontology for Educational Assessment

    Antonio Marzano & Achille Notti, UNIVERSITY OF SALERNO

    Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society Vol. 11, No. 1 (Jan 29, 2015)

  5. Shortcomings of Learning Design Approaches And a Possible Way Out

    Felix Mödritscher & Fridolin Wild, Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration, Austria

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2008 (Jun 30, 2008) pp. 5314–5319

  6. Application of IMS Learning Design for e-Learning

    Cheolil Lim, Sunyoung Kim & Seongyoun Hong, Seoul National University, Korea (South)

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2008 (Jun 30, 2008) pp. 5286–5289

  7. The conceptual structure of generative learning objects (GLOs)

    Tom Boyle, Dejan Ljubojevic, Martin Agombar & Enzian Baur, London Metropolitan University, United Kingdom

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2008 (Jun 30, 2008) pp. 4570–4579

  8. Designing a Learning Design Engine as a Collection of Finite State Machines

    Hubert Vogten, Colin Tattersall, Rob Koper, Peter van Rosmalen, Francis Brouns, Peter Sloep, Jan van Bruggen & Harrie Martens, Open University of the Netherlands, Netherlands

    International Journal on E-Learning Vol. 5, No. 4 (October 2006) pp. 641–661

  9. Extending the Learning Design Specification with Services

    Diana Ragbir & Permanand Mohan, The University of the West Indies, Trinidad And Tobago

    E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2005 (October 2005) pp. 2784–2792

  10. Courseware Development Using a Single Source Approach

    Ludger Thomas & Eric Ras, Fraunhofer Institute for Experimental Software Engineering (IESE), Germany

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2005 (Jun 27, 2005) pp. 4502–4509

  11. eLearning Reality, ID Processes and Pedagogical Objects

    Karin Lundgren-Cayrol, Diane Ruelland, Ileana de la Teja Angeles, France Henri & Marc Couture, LICEF /CIRTA Research Centre, Télé-université,, Canada

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2005 (Jun 27, 2005) pp. 4485–4491

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.