Online discussion processes: Effects of earlier messages’ evaluations, knowledge content, social cues and personal information on later messages
Computers & Education Volume 50, Number 3, ISSN 0360-1315 Publisher: Elsevier Ltd
This study of the flow of online discussions examined how earlier messages affected later messages along five dimensions: (1) evaluations (agreement, disagreement, or unresponsive actions); (2) knowledge content (contribution, repetition, or null content); (3) social cues (positive, negative, or none); (4) personal information (number of visits); and (5) elicitation (eliciting response or not). Using sequential logit regressions and a structural equation model (SEM), this study analyzed 131 messages across seven topics in the mathematics forum of a university Bulletin Board System (BBS) Website. Results showed that a disagreement or contribution in the previous message increased the likelihoods of disagreements and social cue displays in the current message. Unlike face-to-face discussions, online discussion messages that disagreed with an earlier message were more likely to elicit responses. Together, these results support the claims that teachers can use and manage online discussions at the message level to promote critical thinking, facilitate discussion of controversial topics, and reduce status effects.
Chen, G. & Chiu, M.M. (2008). Online discussion processes: Effects of earlier messages’ evaluations, knowledge content, social cues and personal information on later messages. Computers & Education, 50(3), 678-692. Elsevier Ltd.
Cited ByView References & Citations Map
Breno Azevedo, Eliseo Reategui & Patricia Behar
Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects Vol. 10, No. 1 (Jan 01, 2014) pp. 107–121
Ayesha Perveen, Virtual University of Pakistan
Open Praxis Vol. 7, No. 3 (Jul 30, 2015) pp. 243–262
Complexity of Social Interactions in Collaborative Learning: The Case of Online Database Environment
Rikki Rimor, Yigal Rosen & Kefaya Naser, The Open University of Israel, Israel
Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects Vol. 6, No. 1 (Jan 01, 2010) pp. 355–365
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact email@example.com.