You are here:

Faculty Best Practices Using Blended Learning in E-Learning and Face-to-Face Instruction Article

, ITESM-CCM, Mexico

International Journal on E-Learning Volume 5, Number 3, ISSN 1537-2456 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA


Presenting a higher education case study from Mexico: “Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey” (ITESM-CCM) College, Mexico city campus, describing faculty best and worst practices using a blended learning approach in e-learning and face-to-face instruction. The article comments on conceptual definitions of blended learning, its epistemological and pedagogical bases and foundations, and the technological and instructional problems, difficulties, constraints, and successes that ITESM-CCM faculty has when they are using a blended learning approach.


Mortera-Gutiérrez, F. (2006). Faculty Best Practices Using Blended Learning in E-Learning and Face-to-Face Instruction. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(3), 313-337. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved July 23, 2018 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Brown, D.G. (2001). Hybrid courses are best. Syllabus Retrieved January 25, 2006, from
  2. Dennis, A., & Kinney, S. (1998). Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9(3), 256-274. Dennis, A., & Valacich, J. (1999, January). Rethinking media richness: Towards a theory of media Synchronicity. Paper presented at the 32nd Hawaii International Conference of Systems Sciences, Honolulu, Hawaii.
  3. Driscoll, M. (2002). Blended learning. E-Learning 3(3), 54.
  4. Fox, M. (2002). Keeping the blended promise. E-Learning, 3(3), 26-29.
  5. Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine. Hofman, J.
  6. Kerres, M., & De Witt, C. (2003). A didactical framework for the design of blended learning arrangements. Journal of Educational Media, 28(2-3), 101-113.
  7. Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  8. Lion, L. (1985). A proposal for naturalistic inquiry. Body image, self-concept, and sexual functioning of the dying person. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.
  9. Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of telepresence. Journal of Cumputer-Mediated Communication, 3(2).
  10. McIsaac, M.S., & Blocher, J.M. (1998). How research in distance education can affect practice. Educational Media International, 35(1), 43-47.
  11. Oravec, J.A. (2003). Blendin by blogging: Weblogs in blended learning initiatives. Journal of Educational Media, 28(2-3), 225-233.
  12. Osguthorpe, R. T., & Graham, C.R. (2003). Blended learning environments: Definitions and directions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 227-233.
  13. Reay, J. (2001). Blended learning: A fusion for the future. Knowledge Management Review 4(3), 1. Reigeluth, C.M. (1983). Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  14. Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Va l ia than, P.
  15. Young, J.R. (2002). Hybrid teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved January 25, 2006, from

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact