You are here:

Cooperation vs. Deliberation: CMC and the Problem of Argument in International Distance Education
ARTICLE

,

IRRODL Volume 3, Number 1, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press

Abstract

The idea that Internet-based distance education offers the potential to globalize higher education has not been matched by significant interest in the pedagogical and methodological issues at stake. This essay discusses a two-year experimental course conducted between two college classes in Karlskrona, Sweden and Ohio, in the United States. The goal of this course was to use online debate to augment intercultural understanding. This experiment involved both synchronous and asynchronous computer mediated conferencing (CMC) as well as various types of assignments intended to emphasize the discursive strengths of each CMC form. We discovered, however, that our assumptions about CMC discourse were challenged by the way it developed in our international contexts. Ultimately, we developed and propose a methodology that delimits and makes productive the playful agnostics of synchronous debate by employing asynchronous conferencing for the pre-debate development of common ground and the post-debate development of formal arguments. Key Terms: MOO, asynchronous conferencing, international education, collaboration, conflict, argumentation, American studies.

Citation

Davis, M. & Rouzie, A. (2002). Cooperation vs. Deliberation: CMC and the Problem of Argument in International Distance Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1),. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved May 20, 2019 from .

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.