You are here:

Cooperation vs. Deliberation: CMC and the Problem of Argument in International Distance Education


IRRODL Volume 3, Number 1, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press


The idea that Internet-based distance education offers the potential to globalize higher education has not been matched by significant interest in the pedagogical and methodological issues at stake. This essay discusses a two-year experimental course conducted between two college classes in Karlskrona, Sweden and Ohio, in the United States. The goal of this course was to use online debate to augment intercultural understanding. This experiment involved both synchronous and asynchronous computer mediated conferencing (CMC) as well as various types of assignments intended to emphasize the discursive strengths of each CMC form. We discovered, however, that our assumptions about CMC discourse were challenged by the way it developed in our international contexts. Ultimately, we developed and propose a methodology that delimits and makes productive the playful agnostics of synchronous debate by employing asynchronous conferencing for the pre-debate development of common ground and the post-debate development of formal arguments. Key Terms: MOO, asynchronous conferencing, international education, collaboration, conflict, argumentation, American studies.


Davis, M. & Rouzie, A. (2002). Cooperation vs. Deliberation: CMC and the Problem of Argument in International Distance Education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1),. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved April 18, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. How interpersonal- and classroom communication interventions can affect online cooperative learning: An experimental study

    Hannah Klautke & Cary Roseth, Michigan State University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2016 (Mar 21, 2016) pp. 274–277

  2. A Review of e-Learning in Canada: Rejoinder to Commentaries

    Philip Abrami, Robert Bernard, Anne Wade, Eugene Borokhovski, Rana Tamin, Michael Surkes, Dai Zhang & Dai Zhang

    Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie Vol. 32, No. 3 (Oct 15, 2006)

  3. Student Participation in Online Debates Within and Across Course Offerings

    Gayle V. Davidson-Shivers, University of South Alabama, United States; Tuangrat Sriwongkol, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology North Bangkok, Thailand; Crystal A. Thomas & Stephanie McLendon, University of South Alabama, United States

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2008 (Jun 30, 2008) pp. 3687–3694

  4. How do female students perform in online debates and discussion?

    Gayle Davidson-Shivers, Holly Ellis & Kay Amarasing, University of South Alabama, United States

    E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2005 (October 2005) pp. 1972–1977

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact