You are here:

Can Cooperative Learning Maximize the Effectiveness of WebQuest Used in Learning?

, , , Malaysia

iJET Volume 7, Number 4, ISSN 1863-0383 Publisher: International Association of Online Engineering, Kassel, Germany


The purpose of this study is to investigate whether cooperative learning can maximize the effectiveness of webQuest used as a medium in teaching and learning in Islamic education. The present study also examined the perception of students towards WebQuest and cooperative learning method. Muslim students were selected from a rural school in Penang, Malaysia. Quantitative and qualitative approaches were used in this study. The results showed that WebQuest used in teaching and learning in Islamic education had positive impact on studentsâ?? learning'. However, cooperative learning method did not influence the studentsâ?? learning outcome. Nevertheless, students were interested in the medium of instruction used. Integration of ICT in class lesson in Islamic subject enables the creation of interactive and fun learning among students. Therefore, the application of WebQuest in lessons is suitable and should be applied by all teachers in their learning activities to increase studentsâ?? interest and performance in Islamic education.


Spian, R., Ismail, I. & Abu Ziden, A. (2012). Can Cooperative Learning Maximize the Effectiveness of WebQuest Used in Learning?. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 7(4), 58-64. Kassel, Germany: International Association of Online Engineering. Retrieved March 26, 2019 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. [1] Abbit, J., & Ophus, J. (2008). What we know about the Impacts of Web-Quests: A review of research. AACE Journal, 16(4),441-456.
  2. [2] Allan, J., & Street, M. (2007). The quest for deeper learning: An investigation into the impact of a knowledge-pooling WebQuest in primary initial teacher training. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), 1102-1112
  3. [3] Barbour, M., Rieber, L.P., Thomas, G., & Rauscher, D. (2009). Homemade PowerPoint games: A constructionist alternative to WebQuests. TechTrends 53(5).Journal of Science Education and Technology, Vol. 15, No. 2, April 2006 (2006). Http://,A.(1998).ComputerTechnology and Cooperative Learning. Rethrieved from
  4. [9] Heibert, E.H. (1991). Literacy for a diverse society: perspectives, practices, and policies New York: Teachers College Press, Teachers College, Columbia University.
  5. [13] March, T. (1998). WebQuests for learning: Why WebQuests? An introduction. Retrieved August 18, 2011, from [14] Nayereh Baghcheghi, Hamid Reza Koohestani, Koresh Rezaei (2011). A comparison of the cooperative learning and traditional learning methods in theory classes on nursing students' communi DASHDASH
  6. [19] Small, R.V., Dodge, B.M., and Jiang, X. (1996). Dimensions of Interest and Boredom in Instructional Situations. In Proceedings of Annual Conference of Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Indianapolis, IN.
  7. [20] Strickland, J. (2005). Using WebQuests to teach content: Comparing instructional Strategies. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5(2), 138-148.
  8. [21] Swan, K. (2005). A Constructivist Model for Thinking About Learning Online. Needham, MA: Sloan-C.
  9. [22] Vidoni, K.L., & Maddux, C.D. (2002). Web-Quests: Can they be used to improve critical [23] thinking skills in students? Computersin the Schools, 19, 101117.Wang, F., & Hannafin, M.J. (2008). Integrating WebQuests in preservice teacher education.Educational Media International,45(1), 59-73.
  10. [24] Weinburgh, M. (1995), Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32: 387–398.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact