You are here:

Models for Sustainable Open Educational Resources ARTICLE

, National Research Council Canada, Canada

IJELLO Volume 3, Number 1, ISSN 1552-2237 Publisher: Informing Science Institute

Abstract

This paper depicts the sustainability of Open Educational Resources (OERs) in terms of the three models: funding, technical, and content. Discussion and recommendations are focused on the sustainability of OERs and the requirement that we think of OERs as only part of a larger picture – one that includes volunteers and incentives, community and partnerships, co-production and sharing, distributed management and control.

Citation

Downes, S. (2007). Models for Sustainable Open Educational Resources. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 3(1), 29-44. Informing Science Institute. Retrieved November 17, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Barreira, R.T. (2002). Virtual UFC. Paris. UNESCO. Http://www.wcet.info/unesco/barreira_brazil.pdf Beshears, F. (2005). The economic case for Creative Commons textbooks. Utah: Open Education Conference. Http://cosl.usu.edu/media/presentations/opened2005/OpenEd2005-Beshears.ppt [slides] and
  2. Creative Commons. (2006). Choosing a license. Http://creativecommons.org/about/licenses/Daniel,SirJ.(2006).eLearningandfreeopensourcesoftware:Thekeytoglobalmasshighereducation?Malaysia:CommonwealthofLearning.http://www.col.org/speeches/JD_0601eLearningKualaLumpur.htm
  3. Diakité, A. (2002). Contribution de l Université Gamal Abdel Nasser de Conakry, Guinée. [Contribution of the Université Gamal Abdel Nasser de Conakry, Guinée.] Paris: UNESCO. Http://www.wcet.info/unesco/diakite_guinea.pdfDownes,S.(2001).Resourcesfordistanceeducationworldwide.InternationalReviewofResearchinOpenandDistanceLearning(July-2001).http://www.irrodl.org/content/v2.1/downes.html
  4. Downes, S. (2002). Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 2002. The Technology Source, November/December 2002 online November 1, 2002.
  5. Doyle, H.J. (2005). Creating a public library of science. Utah: Open Education Conference. Http://cosl.usu.edu/media/presentations/opened2005/OpenEd2005-Doyle.ppt Elsevier (2004). Responses to questions posed by the Science and Technology Committee. Http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/authored_newsitem.cws_home/companynews05_00069
  6. Everitt, P. (2004). Conservancy proposal. Plone. Http://plone.org/foundation/proposals/conservancy/ Foote, T. (2005) Wikipedia. Utah: Open Education Conference. Http://cosl.usu.edu/media/presentations/opened2005/OpenEd2005-Foote.ppt
  7. Fox, S. & Manduca, C. (2005). Open education for educators: An example from the geosciences. Utah: Open Education Conference. Http://cosl.usu.edu/media/presentations/opened2005/OpenEd2005Fox.ppt
  8. Free Software Foundation (1996). The free software definition. Http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/freesw.html
  9. DownesFriesen, N. (2001). What are educational objects? CAREO. Http://www.careo.org/documents/objects.html
  10. Hanley, G. (2005). Enabling open education with MERLOT. Utah: Open Education Conference. Http://cosl.usu.edu/media/presentations/opened2005/OpenEd2005-Hanley.ppt (slides) and
  11. Horton, D. (2005). How to get people to work for free. Free Software Magazine. Http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/free_issues/issue_09/recruting_people/index_p1.html
  12. Hylén, J. (2005). Open educational resources: Opportunities and challenges. OECD-CERI. Http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/1/49/35733548.doc Johnstone, S.M. (2005). Open educational resources serve the world. Educause Review. Http://www.educause.edu/apps/eq/eqm05/eqm0533.asp
  13. Kansa, E. & Ashley, M. (2005). Embedding open content in instruction and research. Utah: Open Education Conference. Http://cosl.usu.edu/media/presentations/opened2005/OpenEd2005-Kansa.ppt [slides]
  14. Larsen, K. & Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2005). The impact of ICT on tertiary education: Advances and promises. Washington: OECD/NSF/U http://advancingknowledge.com/drafts/LarsenThe%20impact%20of%20ICT%20on%20tertiary%20education%20-%20AKKE.doc
  15. Mason, R. (1004). Distance education across national borders. 1994. In M. Thorpe& D. Grugeon (Eds.), Open learning in the mainstream (pp. 297-308). Harlow, Essex: Longman Group Limited.
  16. Mozilla Foundation (2005). Spread Firefox. Http://www.spreadfirefox.com/ Oberholzer, F. & Strumpf, K. (2004). The effect of file sharing on record sales: An empirical analysis. Http://www.unc.edu/~cigar/papers/FileSharing_March2004.pdf
  17. Open Citation Project (2005). The effect of open access and downloads ('hits') on citation impact: A bibliography of studies. Http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html
  18. Open University (2006). International fellowships at the OU. Milton-Keynes. Http://www.open.ac.uk/international-fellowships/ Prasad, V.S. (2002). Contribution of Prof. V.S. Prasad. Paris: UNESCO. Http://www.wcet.info/unesco/prasad_india.pdf
  19. Sakai Project. (2005). Sakai Partners Program. Http://www.sakaiproject.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=233&Itemid=462StanfordUniversity.(2005).Stanford,AppleteamuptoofferaudiocontentthroughiTunes.http://newsservice.stanford.edu/news/2005/october26/itunes-102605.html
  20. Stephenson, R. (2005) How to make open education succeed. Utah: Open Education Conference. Http://cosl.usu.edu/media/presentations/opened2005/OpenEd2005-Stephenson.pptSterne,P.&Herring,N.(2005,December30).LinuxWorld:Theconversionmodel.LinuxWorld.http://de.sys-con.com/read/158863.htm
  21. Walker, E. (2005). A reality check for open education. Utah: Open Education Conference. Http://cosl.usu.edu/media/presentations/opened2005/OpenEd2005-WalkerEd.ppt [slides] and
  22. Wellcome Trust (2006). Wellcome Trust and publishers reach agreement on open access. Http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/doc_WTX027916.html
  23. Wiley, D. (2000). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In D.A. Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects [Online version]. Http://reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc Wiley, D. (2005). Thoughts from the Hewlett Open Ed grantees meeting. Http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/192
  24. Yeates, S. (2005) GNU EPrints software moves to a service-based model.. Educause Blogs. Http://connect.educause.edu/blog/stuartyeates/gnu_eprints_software_moves_to_a_service_based_mode l/1172
  25. Zalta, E.N. (2005). A new model for open access to scholarly and educational content. Utah: Open Education Conference. Http://cosl.usu.edu/media/presentations/opened2005/OpenEd2005-Zalta.pdf

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Introduction to Open Educational Resources for Teacher Educators

    Kathryn S. Lee & Carol J. Delaney, Texas State University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2018 (Mar 26, 2018) pp. 202–207

  2. How Korean Language Arts Teachers Adopt and Adapt Open Educational Resources: A Study of Teachers’ and Students’ Perspectives

    SuBeom Kwak, The Ohio State University, Columbus

    The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 18, No. 4 (Jun 16, 2017)

  3. Incentivizing the Production and Use of Open Educational Resources in Higher Education Institutions

    David Annand, Athabasca University - Canada's Open University; Tilly Jensen, Athabasca University

    The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 18, No. 4 (Jun 16, 2017)

  4. Moving to open educational resources at Athabasca University: A case study

    Cindy Ives & Mary Pringle

    The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 14, No. 2 (May 09, 2013) pp. 1–13

  5. Mobile authoring of open educational resources as reusable learning objects

    Kinshuk & Ryan Jesse

    The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 14, No. 2 (May 09, 2013) pp. 28–52

  6. Are College Faculty Willing – and Ready – to Have Their Courses “Open”?

    Huei-Chuan Wei & Chien Chou, Institute of Education, National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2017 (Mar 05, 2017) pp. 319–324

  7. Atolls, Islands, and Archipelagos: The California OER Council and the New Landscape for Open Education in California

    Lawrence Hanley, San Francisco State University; Diego Bonilla, Sacramento State University

    Open Praxis Vol. 8, No. 2 (May 13, 2016) pp. 131–142

  8. Dimensions of Openness: Beyond the Course as an Open Format in Online Education

    Christian Dalsgaard & Klaus Thestrup, Aarhus University

    The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 16, No. 6 (Dec 03, 2015)

  9. Cost-savings achieved in two semesters through the adoption of open educational resources

    John Hilton III, T Robinson, David Wiley & J Ackerman, Brigham Young University

    The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 15, No. 2 (Apr 01, 2014)

  10. Recognising Informal Elearning with Digital Badging: Evidence for a Sustainable Business Model

    Patrina Law, The Open University

    Open Praxis Vol. 7, No. 4 (Nov 26, 2015) pp. 299–310

  11. Developing a Sustainable Financial Model in Higher Education for Open Educational Resources

    David Annand, Athabasca University - Canada's Open University

    The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 16, No. 5 (Sep 29, 2015)

  12. The adoption of open educational resources by one community college math department

    John Hilton III, Brigham Young University; Donna Gaudet & Phil Clark, Scottsdale Community College; Jared Robinson & David Wiley, BYU

    The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 14, No. 4 (Aug 28, 2013)

  13. Measuring use and creation of open educational resources in higher education

    Ross McKerlich, Okanagan College; Cindy Ives & Rory McGreal, Athabasca University

    The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 14, No. 4 (Aug 28, 2013)

  14. Openness in Education, Systems Thinking, and the Practitioner

    Anita Zijdemans Boudreau, Pacific University, College of Education, United States

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2014 (Jun 23, 2014) pp. 1065–1071

  15. Playing catch-up: Investigating public and institutional policies for OER practices in Australia

    Carina Bossu, University of New England; Mark Brown, Massey University; David Bull, University of Southern Queensland

    Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning Vol. 15, No. 2 (2011) pp. 41–54

  16. Pedagogical quality enrichment in OER based courseware: Guiding principles

    Pradeep Misra, M.J.P. Rohilkhand University, India

    Open Praxis Vol. 5, No. 2 (May 17, 2013) pp. 123–134

  17. Degrees of Openness: The emergence of Open Educational Resources at the University of Cape Town

    Cheryl Hodgkinson-Williams & Eve Gray, University of Cape Town, South Africa

    International Journal of Education and Development using ICT Vol. 5, No. 5 (Oct 24, 2009) pp. 101–116

  18. A Model for the Effective Management of Re-Usable Learning Objects (RLOs): Lessons from a Case Study

    Mary Tate & Darryn Hoshek, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand

    Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects Vol. 5, No. 1 (Jan 01, 2009) pp. 51–72

  19. Reading in A Digital Age: e-Books Are Students Ready For This Learning Object?

    Nicole Buzzetto-More, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, United States; Retta Guy, Fayetteville State University, United States; Muna Elobaid, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, United States

    Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects Vol. 3, No. 1 (Jan 01, 2007) pp. 239–250

  20. [Chais] The Usage of Data Repositories: The Case of MAOR

    Anat Cohen, Tel Aviv University, Israel; Eli Shmueli, MEITAL, Israel; Rafi Nachmias, Tel Aviv University, Israel

    Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects Vol. 7, No. 1 (Jan 01, 2011) pp. 323–338

  21. Open Content and Open Educational Resources: Enabling universal education

    Tom Caswell, Shelley Henson, Marion Jensen & David Wiley, The Center for Open and Sustainable Learning at Utah State University

    The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 9, No. 1 (Feb 26, 2008)

  22. A preliminary examination of the cost savings and learning impacts of using open textbooks in middle and high school science classes

    David Wiley & John Hilton III, Brigham Young University; Shelley Ellington & Tiffany Hall

    The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 13, No. 3 (May 22, 2012) pp. 262–276

  23. Harnessing Open Educational Resources to the Challenges of Teacher Education in Sub-Saharan Africa

    Jayshree Thakrar, Freda Wolfenden & Denise Zinn

    The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 10, No. 4 (Aug 21, 2009)

  24. Incentives and Disincentives for the Use of OpenCourseWare

    Anne Arendt & Brett Shelton, Utah State University

    The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 10, No. 5 (Oct 14, 2009)

  25. Developing and deploying OERs in sub-Saharan Africa: Building on the present

    Clayton Wright, Co-Regional Editor for Africa; Sunday Reju, Nambia

    The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 13, No. 2 (Apr 02, 2012) pp. 181–220

  26. Open access textbooks and financial sustainability: A case study on Flat World Knowledge

    John Hilton III & David Wiley, Brigham Young University

    The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Vol. 12, No. 5 (Jun 29, 2011) pp. 18–26

  27. Supporting the Collaborative Adaptation of Open Educational Resources: The OpenScout Tool Library

    Alexander Mikroyannidis, Alexandra Okada, Suzanne Little & Teresa Connolly, The Open University, United Kingdom

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2011 (Jun 27, 2011) pp. 3734–3739

  28. Open Educational Resources: Future Directions for Research and Practice

    Stefanie Panke, University of Ulm, Germany

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2011 (Jun 27, 2011) pp. 1429–1438

  29. Ingredients of Educational Portals as Infrastructures for Informal Learning Activities

    Stefanie Panke, Knowledge Media Research Center, Germany

    E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2007 (Oct 15, 2007) pp. 1203–1212

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.