You are here:

[Chais] The Usage of Data Repositories: The Case of MAOR
ARTICLE

, Tel Aviv University, Israel ; , MEITAL, Israel ; , Tel Aviv University, Israel

IJELLO Volume 7, Number 1, ISSN 1552-2237 Publisher: Informing Science Institute

Abstract

MAOR (Meta-data and Object Repository) is a national Israeli repository of online learning ob- ject meta-data. MAOR serves as a major online learning resource repository, containing materials for both K-12 and Higher Education and enabling teachers to share, reuse, and remix modular learning objects. This paper describes the MAOR repository and the stages of its establishment. Subsequently the growth of the repository analysis is presented, focusing on the learning objects characteristics, contribution rate, and contributors’ profile. The outcomes of the analysis indicated that learning objects from different disciplines (especially Science and Technology, Social Sci- ence, and Humanities) were contributed to the MAOR repository. Varied types of learning objects were found, representing different types of content and activities with different goals aimed at diverse target audiences. The majority of resources were contributed by educational institutions, mainly academic institutions and content providers. Although MOAR was established on the basis of the MERLOT model, its contributors’ profile is different due to the fact that most of the contributors are the authors. Besides, the findings that are set out in this paper also show distinction in contribution rate between the institutions that consider the contribution of materials as part of their policy and institutions that do not.

Citation

Cohen, A., Shmueli, E. & Nachmias, R. (2011). [Chais] The Usage of Data Repositories: The Case of MAOR. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 7(1), 323-338. Informing Science Institute. Retrieved March 23, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Abelson, H. (2008). The creation of OpenCourseWare at MIT. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(2), 164-174.
  2. Bar-Ilan, Y. (2008). Israeli standard for learning material-ISRACore. Proceeding of the 6th annual conference of Meital, Haifa University, Israel.
  3. Barker, P., & Campbell, L.M. (2010). Metadata for learning materials: An overview of existing standards and current developments. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 7(3-4), 225-243.
  4. Cechinel, C., Sanchez-Alonso, S., & Garcia-Barriocanal, E. (2011). Statistical profiles of highly-rated learning objects. Computers& Education, 57(1), 1255-1269.
  5. Dahl, O.J., & Nygaard, K. (1966). SIMULA-An ALGOL based simulation language. Communications of the ACM, 9(9), 671-678.
  6. Downes, S. (2007). Models for sustainable open educational resources. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3, 29-44. Retrieved from http://www.ijello.org/Volume3/IJKLOv3p029044Downes.pdf
  7. Duncan, C. (2003). Digital repositories: e-Learning for everyone. Presented at eLearn International, 9–12 February, Edinburgh.
  8. Foster, N.F., & Gibbons, S. (2005). Understanding faculty to improve content recruitment for institutional repositories. D-Lib Magazine, 11(1). Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january05/foster/01foster.html
  9. Friesen, N. (2009). Open educational resources: New possibilities for change and sustainability. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(5), 1-13.
  10. Hylén, J. (2006). Open educational resources: Opportunities and challenges. Retrieved August 18, 2011 from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/5/47/37351085.pdf The JORUM Team. (2006). E-learning repository systems research watch. Project Document.
  11. MAOR. (2011) Meta-data and Object Repository website [On-line]. Available at http://maor.iucc.ac.il/ MERLOT. (2011). Multimedia educational resource for learning and on-line teaching website [On-line]. Available at http://www.merlot.org/
  12. Monge, S., Ovelar, R., & Azpeitia, I. (2008). Repository 2.0: Social dynamics to support community building in learning object repositories. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Object, 4, 191-204.
  13. Nachmias, R., Leiba, M., & Ram, J. (2007). European Virtual N2L University (EVNU) – Educational exchange in Nano2Life – A network of excellence. Paper presented at the EDEN 2007 annual conference– NEW LEARNING 2.0? Emerging digital territories developing continuities New divides, Italy.
  14. Nash, S.S. (2005) Learning objects, learning objects repositories, and learning theory: Preliminary best practices for online courses. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 1, 217-228.
  15. Schell, G.P., & Burns, M. (2002). Merlot: A repository of e-learning objects for higher education. EService Journal, 1(2), 53-64.
  16. Shmueli, E., & Cohen, A. (2011). The usage of open educational resources in MAOR repository. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  17. Shmueli, E., Reisman, S., & Sperling, B. (2010). The new learning communities: MAOR-The Israeli learning object repository. Emerging Technologies for Online Learning. Retrieved May 20, 2011 from http://sloanconsortium.org/et4online/maor-israeli-learning-object-repository Sicilia, M., García-Barriocanal, E., Sánchez-Alonso, S., & Cechinel, C. (2010). Exploring user-based recommender results in large learning object repositories: The case of MERLOT. Procedia Computer Science, 1, 2859-2864.
  18. Taibi, D., Gentile, M., & Seta, L. (2005). A semantic search engine for learning resources. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Multimedia and Information& Communication Technologies in Education.
  19. Tal-Elhasid, E., Yair, Y., & Meishar-Tal, H. (2009). "Open Books": Free opening of academic e-books, audio-books and educational resources at The Open University of Israel: Lessons from the first year. Paper presented at E-society 2009, IADIS International Association for Development of the Information Society, Barcelona, Spain.
  20. Taylor, J.C. (2007). Opencourseware futures: Creating a parallel universe. E-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 10(1), 1-9.
  21. Wiley, D.A. (2000). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In D.A. Wiley (Ed.), The instructional use of learning objects: Online version. Retrieved January 15, 2007 from http://reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc World Forum of UNESCO Chairs (2002). Proposal for launching the “Academics across Borders” initiative, Paris. Retrieved May 20, 2011 from http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/file_download.php/ba88fefb95a301b90e6395044552516baab_do

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.