You are here:

E-Learning Platform Usage Analysis

, , Democritus University of Thrace, Greece ; , TEI of Kavala, Greece ; , Democritus University of Thrace, Greece

IJELLO Volume 7, Number 1, ISSN 1552-2237 Publisher: Informing Science Institute


E-learning is technology-based learning, such as computer-based learning, web-based learning, virtual classroom, and digital collaboration. The usage of web applications can be measured with the use of indexes and metrics. However, in e-Learning platforms there are no appropriate indexes and metrics that would facilitate their qualitative and quantitative measurement. The purpose of this paper is to describe the use of data mining techniques, such as clustering, classification, and association, in order to analyze the log file of an eLearning platform and deduce useful conclusions. Two metrics for course usage measurement and one algorithm for course classification are used. A case study based on a previous approach was applied to e-Learning data from a Greek University. The results confirmed the validity of the approach and showed a strong relationship between the course usage and the corresponding students' grades in the exams. From a pedagogical point of view this method contributes to improvements in course content and course usability and the adaptation of courses in accordance with student capabilities. Improvement in course quality gives students the opportunity of asynchronous study of courses with actu- alized and optimal educational material and, therefore, higher performance in exams. It should be mentioned that even though the scope of the method is on e-Learning platforms and educational content, it can be easily adopted to other web applications such as e-government, e-commerce, e-banking, blogs, etc.


Valsamidis, S., Kontogiannis, S., Kazanidis, I. & Karakos, A. (2011). E-Learning Platform Usage Analysis. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 7(1), 185-204. Informing Science Institute. Retrieved March 27, 2019 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Agrawal R., Imielinski, T., & Swami, A.N. (1993). Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. Proceedings of SIGMOD (pp. 207-216).
  2. Agrawal, R., Mannila, H., Srikant, R., Toivonen, H., & Verkamo A. (1996). Fast discovery of association rules. In U.M. Fayyad, G. Piatetsky-Shapiro, P. Smyth, & R. Uthurusamy (Eds.), Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 307-328). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI/MIT Press.
  3. Agrawal, R., & Srikant, R. (1994). Fast algorithms for mining association rules. Proceedings of 20th International Conference on Very Large DataBases (pp. 487-499).
  4. Avouris, N., Komis, V., Fiotakis, G., Margaritis, M., & Voyiatzaki, G. (2005). Logging of fingertip actions is not enough for analysis of learning activities. Proceedings of Workshop Usage Analysis in learning systems (AIED’05), Amsterdam. 201 E-Learning Platform Usage Analysis
  5. Baker, R., Corbett, A., & Koedinger, K. (2004). Detecting student misuse of intelligent tutoring systems. Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, (pp.531–540).
  6. Castro, F., Vellido, A., Nebot, A., & Minguillon, J. (2005). Detecting atypical student behaviour on an elearning system. In Simposio Nacional de Tecnologı´as de la Informacin y las Comunicaciones en la Educacion (pp. 153–160). Spain: Granada.
  7. Castro, F., Vellido, A., Nebot, A., & Mugica, F. (2007). Applying data mining techniques to e-learning problems: A survey and state of the art. In L.C. Jain, R. Tedman, & D. Tedman (Eds.), Evolution of teaching and learning paradigms in intelligent environment. Studies in Computational Intelligence 62, Springer-Verlag.
  8. Cone, J.W., & Robinson, D.G. (2001). The power of e-performance. Training& Development, 55(6), 32– 41.
  9. Delacey, B., & Leonard, D. (2002). Case study on technology and distance in education at the Harvard Business School. Educational Technology and Society, 5(2), 13-28.
  10. Feng, M., & Heffernan, N.T. (2005). Informing teachers live about student learning: Reporting in the assistment system. Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education 2005, Amsterdam.
  11. Fichter, D. (2002). Intranets and e-learning: a perfect partnership. Online, 26(1), 68-71.
  12. García, E., Romero, C., Ventura, S., & De Castro, C. (2008). An architecture for making recommendations to courseware authors using association rule mining and collaborative filtering. Journal of User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 19 (1-2), 99-132.
  13. GUNet. (2011). Retrieved April 10, 2011 from Hamalainen, W., & Vinni, M. (2006). Comparison of machine learning methods for intelligent tutoring systems. Procceedings of Int. Conf. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems, (pp. 525–534).
  14. Holte, R.C. (1993). Very simple classification rules perform well on most commonly used datasets. Machine Learning, 11, 63-91.
  15. Kaufmann, L., & Rousseeuw, P.J. (1990). Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. New York: John Wiley& Sons.
  16. Kazanidis, I., Valsamidis, S., & Theodosiou, T. (2009). Proposed framework for data mining in e-learning: The case of Open e-Class. Proceedings of Applied Computing 09, Rome, Italy.
  17. Khribi, M.K., Jemni, M., & Nasraoui, O. (2009). Automatic recommendations for e-learning personalization based on web usage mining techniques and information retrieval. Educational Technology& Society, 12 (4), 30–42.
  18. Kotsiantis, S.B., Pierrakeas, C.J. & Pintelas, P.E. (2003). Preventing student dropout in distance learning using machine learning techniques. Proceedings of 7th International Conference on Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (KES), (pp 267–274).
  19. Kotsiantis, S.B., Pierrakeas, C.J., & Pintelas, P.E. (2004). Predicting students’ performance in distance learning using machine learning techniques, Applied Artificial Intelligence (AAI), 18(5), 411 – 426.
  20. Koutri, M., Avouris, N., & Daskalaki, S. (2005). A survey on web usage mining techniques for web-based adaptive hypermedia systems. In S.Y. Chen& G.D. Magoulas (Eds.), Adaptable and adaptive hypermedia systems (pp. 125–149). IRM Press.
  21. MacQueen, J. (1967). Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. In Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, (pp. 281–297).
  22. Mazza, R., & Milani, C. (2004). GISMO: A graphical interactive student monitoring tool for course management systems. Proceedings of International Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning ’04 (T.E.L.’04). Milan, Italy.
  23. Minaei-Bidgoli, B., Kashy, D.A., Kortemeyer, G., & Punch, W. (2003). Predicting student performance: An application of data mining methods with an educational web-based system. Proceedings of 33rd Frontiers in Education Conference, (pp. T2A13–T2A18).
  24. Minaei-Bidgoli, B., Tan, P-N, & Punch, W.F. (2004). Mining interesting contrast rules for a web-based educational system. Proceedings of Int. Conf. On Machine Learning Applications, Louisville, USA 2004 (pp. 320-327).
  25. Mostow, J., Beck, J., Cen, H., Cuneo, A., Gouvea, E., & Heiner, C. (2005). An educational data mining tool to browse tutor-student interactions: Time will tell!. Proceedings of workshop on educational data mining (pp. 15–22).
  26. Normark, O.R., Cetindamar, D. (2005) E-learning in a competitive firm setting. Innovations in Education& Teaching International, 42(4), 325-335.
  27. Pabarskaite, Z., & Raudys, A. (2007). A process of knowledge discovery from weblog data: systematization and critical review. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 28, 79-114.
  28. Romero, C., Gutierez, S., Freire, M., & Ventura, S. (2008). Mining and visualizing visited trails in webbased educational systems. In Educational Data Mining 2008, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 182-186). Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
  29. Romero, C. & Ventura, S. (2007). Educational Data Mining: a Survey from 1995 to 2005. Elsevier Journal of Expert Systems with Applications, 33 (1), 135-146.
  30. Radcliffe, D. (2002). Technological and pedagogical convergence between work-based and campus-based learning. Educational Technology and Society, 5(2), 54-59.
  31. Srinivasa, R. (2005). Data mining in e-commerce: A survey. Sadhana, 30(2 & 3), 275–289.
  32. Starr, R.M. (1977) Delivering instruction on the WorldWide Web: Overview and basic design principles. Educational Technology, 37(3), 7-15.
  33. Ueno, M. (2002). Learning-log database and data mining system for e-learning, Proceedings. Of International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2002, (pp. 436-438).
  34. Valsamidis, S., Kazanidis, I., Kontogiannis, S., & Karakos, A. (2010). Automated suggestions and course ranking through web mining. Proceedings of 10th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies ICALT 2010, Sousse, Tunisia.
  35. Valsamidis, S., Kontogiannis, S., Kazanidis, I., & Karakos, A. (2010). Homogeneity and enrichment: Two metrics for web applications assessment. Proceedings of 14th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics. Witten, I., & Frank, E., (2005). Data mining practical machine learning tools and techniques. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
  36. Yan, T.W., Jacobsen, M., Garcia-Molina, H., & Dayal, U. (1996). From user access patterns to dynamic hypertext linking. Proceedings of the Fifth International WorldWide Web Conference on Computer networks and ISDN systems, (pp. 1007-1014), Paris, France.
  37. Zaiane, O.R. (2001). Web usage mining for a better web-based learning environment. Proceedings of Conference on Advanced Technology for Education.
  38. Zorrilla, M.E., & Álvarez, E. (2008). MATEP: Monitoring and analysis tool for e-learning platforms, Proceedings of the Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, (pp. 611613).

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact