#
Developing Inquiry Practices in Middle Grades Mathematics Teachers: Examining the Introduction of Technology
ARTICLE

## Andrew M Tyminski, Leigh Haltiwanger, V. Serbay Zambak, Robert Horton, Traci Hedetniemi, Clemson University, United States

CITE Journal Volume 13, Number 4, ISSN 1528-5804 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA

## Abstract

Over 2 years a small group of middle school mathematics teachers’ beliefs, attitudes, and practices were investigated in order to transform their practice to an inquiry-based, technology-rich model. Research has suggested that technology and pedagogical innovations should be introduced together, so that teachers learn mathematics in the way their students will. This claim is examined within the study. Results indicate that all of the teachers expressed interest and had positive attitudes about incorporating the calculators as they moved to an inquiry-driven model, and these attitudes continued to improve over the course of the project. However, teachers were divided about when to introduce the calculators. Some were adamant that they would have been too overwhelmed had the technology been introduced during the first year when they were trying to deepen their own content knowledge and implement inquiry. One teacher, for whom all aspects were integrated from the outset, believed the technology provided the motivation to transform her practice. Results suggest that teachers’ backgrounds, their depth of knowledge, and their familiarity and comfort with integrating technology into their instruction should inform professional development design.

## Citation

Tyminski, A.M., Haltiwanger, L., Zambak, V.S., Horton, R. & Hedetniemi, T. (2013). Developing Inquiry Practices in Middle Grades Mathematics Teachers: Examining the Introduction of Technology. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4), 325-359. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved June 18, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/43721/.

© 2013 Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education

## References

View References & Citations Map- Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. (2006). Preparing teachers to use technology to enhance the learning of mathematics: A position of the Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators. Retrieved from http://www.amte.net/sites/all/themes/amte/resources/AMTETechnologyPositIonStatement.pdf
- Beaudin, M., & Bowers, D. (1997). Logistics for facilitating CAS instruction. In J. Berry, J. Monaghan, M. Kronfellner, & B. Kutzler (Eds.), The state of computer algebra in mathematics education (pp. 126-135). Lancashire,
- Burrill, G., Allison, J., Breaux, G., Kastberg, S., Leatham, K., & Sanchez, W. (2002). Handheld graphing technology in secondary mathematics. Dallas, TX: Texas Instruments.
- Chen, C. (2008). Why do teachers not practice what they believe regarding technology integration? The Journal of Educational Research, 102(1), 65-75.
- Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_Math%20Standards.pdf
- Drier, H.S. (2001, March). Beliefs, experiences, and reflections that affect the development of techno-mathematical knowledge. Paper presented at the
- Fennema, E., & Franke, M.L. (1992). Teachers’ knowledge and its impact. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147-164). New York, NY: Macmillan.
- Grandgenett, N.F. (2008). Perhaps a matter of imagination: TPCK in mathematics education. In J. Colbert, K. Boyd, K.Clark, S. Guan, J. Harris, M. Kelly, & A. Thompson (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) for educators (pp. 145-166). New York, NY: Routledge.
- Haury, D.L. (2002). Learning science through design (ERIC Digest). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
- Killion, J., & Harrison, C. (2006). Taking the lead: New roles for teachers and school-based coaches. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council.
- Koehler, M.J., & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol9/iss1/general/article1.cfm
- Kuhs, T.M., & Ball, D.L. (1986). Approaches to teaching mathematics: Mapping the domains of knowledge, skills, and dispositions. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, Center on Teacher Education.
- Lerman, S. (1990). Alternative perspectives of the nature of mathematics and their influence on the teaching of mathematics. British Educational Research Journal, 16(1), 53-61.
- Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
- Marshall, J.C., & Horton, R.M. (2011). The relationship of teacher facilitated inquiry-based instruction to student higher-order thinking. School Science and Mathematics, 111(3), 93-101.
- Marshall, J.C., Horton, B., & Smart, J. (2009). 4E x 2 instructional model: Uniting three learning constructs to improve praxis in science and mathematics classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(6), 501-516.
- Marshall, J.C., Smart, J., & Horton, R.M. (2010). The design and validation of EQUIP: An instrument to assess inquiry-based instruction. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(2), 299-321.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1980). Agenda for action. Reston, VA: Author.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4)
- National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Neiderhauser, D.S., & Perkmen, S. (2008). Validation of the intrapersonal technology integration scale: Assessing the influence of intrapersonal factors that influence technology integration. Computers in Schools, 25(1-2), 98-111.
- Neufeld, B., & Roper, D. (2003). Coaching: A strategy for developing instructional capacity – promises and practicalities. Washington, DC: Aspen
- Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307-332.
- Papanastasiou, E.C., & Angeli, C. (2008). Evaluating the use of ICT in education: Psychometric properties of the survey of factors affecting teachers teaching with technology (SFA-T3). Educational Technology & Society, 11 (1), 69-86.
- Shulman, L.S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
- Shymansky, J.A., Kyle, W.C., & Alport, J.M. (1983). The effects of new science curricula on student performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 387-404.
- Tharp, M.L., Fitzsimmons, J.A., & Brown Ayers, R.L. (1997). Negotiating a technological shift: Teacher perception of the implementation of graphing calculators. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 16, 551-575.
- Thompson, A.G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127-146). New York, NY: Macmillan.
- Turner, P., & Chauvot, J. (1995). Teaching with technology: Two preservice teachers’ beliefs. In D. Owens, M. Reed, & G. Millsaps (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 115-121). Columbus,
- Wise, K.C., & Okey, J.R. (1983). A meta-analysis of the effects of various science teaching strategies on achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 419-435.
- Zbiek, R.M., & Hollebrands, K. (2008). A research-informed view of the process of incorporating mathematics technology into classroom practice by inservice and prospective teachers. Research on Technology and the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, 1, 287-344.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References