You are here:

A Review of e-Learning in Canada: Rejoinder to Commentaries
ARTICLE

, , , , , ,

CJLT Volume 32, Number 3, ISSN 1499-6677 e-ISSN 1499-6677 Publisher: Canadian Network for Innovation in Education

Abstract

Citation

Abrami, P., Bernard, R., Wade, A., Borokhovski, E., Tamin, R., Surkes, M., Zhang, D. & Zhang, D. (2006). A Review of e-Learning in Canada: Rejoinder to Commentaries. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 32(3),. Canadian Network for Innovation in Education. Retrieved March 24, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Abrami, P.C., & Bernard, R.M. (2006). Research on distance education: In defense of field experiments. Distance Education, 27(1), 5–26.
  2. Abrami, P.C., Bernard, R.B., & Wade, C.A. (2006). Affecting policy and practice: Issues involved in developing an argument catalogue. Evidence& Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2(4), Abrami, P.C., Bernard, R.M., Wade, A., Schmid, R.F., Borokhovski, E., Tamin, R., Surkes, M., Lowerison, G.,
  3. Zhang, D., Nicolaidou, I., Newman, S., Wozney, L., & Peretiatkowicz, A. (2007). A review of E-learning in Canada: A rough sketch of the evidence, gaps and promising directions. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology. 33(1), 1–68.
  4. Abrami, P.C., Cohen, P., & D’Apollonia, S. (1988). Implementation problems in meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 58(2), 151–179.
  5. Anderson, T. (2006). A response and commentary to: A review of e-learning in Canada.
  6. Aviv, R., Zippy, E., Ravid, G., & Geva, A. (2003). Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3). Retrieved December 30, 2005, from http://www.sloan-C.org/publications/jaln/v7n3/v7n3_aviv.asp
  7. Bernard, R.M., & Naidu, S. (1990). Integrating research into practice: The use and abuse of meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 19(3), 171–195.
  8. Bonk, C., & Cunningham, D. (1998). Searching for constructivist, learner-centered and sociocultural components for collaborative educational learning tools. In C. Bonk& K. King (Eds.),
  9. Bullen, M. (1999). Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education. Journal of Distance Education,13(2). Retrieved April 20, 2006, from http://cade.athabascau.ca/vol13.2/bullen.html
  10. Cook, T.D. (2004). Randomized experiments in education: Why are they so rare? (Institute for Policy Research Working Paper WP-02-19). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
  11. Davis, M., & Rouzie, A. (2002). Cooperation vs. Deliberation: Computer mediated conferencing and the problem of argument in international distance education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 3(1). Retrieved September 1, 2006, from http://www.irrodl.org/content/v3.1/davis.html
  12. De Laat, M. (2001). Network and content analysis in an online community discourse. CSCL-ware in practice. New York: Kluwer Publications.
  13. Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwai, S., Jones, D., Young, B. & Sutton, A. (2005). Synthesising qualitative and quantitative methods: a review of possible methods.
  14. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23.
  15. Gunawardena, C., Carabajal, K., & Lowe, C.A. (2001). Critical analysis of models and methods used to evaluate online learning networks. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED456159).
  16. Gunawardena, C., Lowe, C., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 395–429.
  17. Haughey, M. (2006). Commentary of e-learning review. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 32(3), 111–118.
  18. Jeong, A. (2004). The effects of communication style and message function in triggering responses and critical discussion in computer-supported collaborative argumentation. Paper in conference proceedings of the Annual meeting of the Association of Educational Communications& Technology, Chicago, IL.
  19. Kanuka, H. (2005). An exploration into facilitating higher levels of learning in a text-based Internet learning environment using diverse instructional strategies. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 10(3). [online]. Retrieved September 1, 2006, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/kanuka.html
  20. Kanuka, H. (2006). A review of e-learning in Canada: A rough sketch of the evidence, gaps and promising directions: A commentary. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 32(3), 85–100.
  21. Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lopez-Islas, (2001). Across-cultural study of group processes and development in online conferences. Distance Education, 22(1), 85–121.
  22. McKlin, T., Harmon, S.W., Evans, W., & Jones, M.G. (2002). Cognitive presence in web based learning: A
  23. McLaughlin, C., & Luca, J. (2000). Cognitive engagement and higher order thinking through computer conferencing: We know why but do we know how? Retrieved September 1, 2006, from http://www.lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2000/mcloughlin.html
  24. Meyer, K.A. (2003). Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: The role of time and higher-order thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 55–65.
  25. Nussbaum, M., Hartley, K., Sinatra, G.M., Reynolds, R.E., & Bendixen, L.D. (2002). Enhancing the quality of on-line discussions. New Orleans, LA: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
  26. Pawan, F., Paulus, T.M., Yalcin, S., & Chang, C-F. (2003). Online learning: Patterns of engagement and interaction among in-service teachers. Language Learning& Technology, 7(3), 119–140. [online]. Retrieved on October 14, 2006 from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/pawan/
  27. Pena-Shaff, J. (2005). Asynchronous online discussions as a tool for learning: Students’ attitudes, expectations, and perceptions. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16(4), 409–430.
  28. Pena-Shaff, J., Martin, W., & Gay, G (2001). An epistemological framework for analyzing student interactions in computer-mediated communication environments.
  29. Rourke, L. (2005). Learning through online discussion. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Alberta,, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  30. Rovai, A., & Barnum, K. (2003). Online course effectiveness: An analysis of student interactions and perceptions of learning. Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 57–73.
  31. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In T. Koschmann, (Ed.),
  32. Schwier, R.A. (2006). Commentary on “A review of e-learning in Canada”. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 32(3), 71–83.
  33. Thomas, M. (2002). Learning within incoherent structures: The space of online discussion forums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 351–366.
  34. Vaughan, N., & Garrison, D.R. (2005). Creating cognitive presence in a blended faculty development community. (1), 1–12.
  35. Veerman, A., Andriessen, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Learning through synchronous electronic discussion. Computers& Education, 34(3–4), 269–290.
  36. Wilson, D., Varnhagen, S., Krupa, E., Kasprzak, S., Hunting, V., & Taylor, A. (2003). Instructors’ adaptation to online graduate education in health promotion: A qualitative study. Journal of Distance Education, 18(2), 1–15.
  37. Yakimovicz, A., & Murphy, K.L. (1995). Constructivism and collaboration on the Internet: Case study of a graduate class experience. Computers in Education, 24(3), 203–209.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.