CJLT Volume 32, Number 3, ISSN 1499-6677 e-ISSN 1499-6677 Publisher: Canadian Network for Innovation in Education
Abrami, P., Bernard, R., Wade, A., Borokhovski, E., Tamin, R., Surkes, M., Zhang, D. & Zhang, D. (2006). A Review of e-Learning in Canada: Rejoinder to Commentaries. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 32(3),. Canadian Network for Innovation in Education. Retrieved March 24, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/43055/.
- Abrami, P.C., & Bernard, R.M. (2006). Research on distance education: In defense of field experiments. Distance Education, 27(1), 5–26.
- Abrami, P.C., Bernard, R.B., & Wade, C.A. (2006). Affecting policy and practice: Issues involved in developing an argument catalogue. Evidence& Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 2(4), Abrami, P.C., Bernard, R.M., Wade, A., Schmid, R.F., Borokhovski, E., Tamin, R., Surkes, M., Lowerison, G.,
- Zhang, D., Nicolaidou, I., Newman, S., Wozney, L., & Peretiatkowicz, A. (2007). A review of E-learning in Canada: A rough sketch of the evidence, gaps and promising directions. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology. 33(1), 1–68.
- Abrami, P.C., Cohen, P., & D’Apollonia, S. (1988). Implementation problems in meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 58(2), 151–179.
- Anderson, T. (2006). A response and commentary to: A review of e-learning in Canada.
- Aviv, R., Zippy, E., Ravid, G., & Geva, A. (2003). Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3). Retrieved December 30, 2005, from http://www.sloan-C.org/publications/jaln/v7n3/v7n3_aviv.asp
- Bernard, R.M., & Naidu, S. (1990). Integrating research into practice: The use and abuse of meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 19(3), 171–195.
- Bonk, C., & Cunningham, D. (1998). Searching for constructivist, learner-centered and sociocultural components for collaborative educational learning tools. In C. Bonk& K. King (Eds.),
- Bullen, M. (1999). Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education. Journal of Distance Education,13(2). Retrieved April 20, 2006, from http://cade.athabascau.ca/vol13.2/bullen.html
- Cook, T.D. (2004). Randomized experiments in education: Why are they so rare? (Institute for Policy Research Working Paper WP-02-19). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
- Davis, M., & Rouzie, A. (2002). Cooperation vs. Deliberation: Computer mediated conferencing and the problem of argument in international distance education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 3(1). Retrieved September 1, 2006, from http://www.irrodl.org/content/v3.1/davis.html
- De Laat, M. (2001). Network and content analysis in an online community discourse. CSCL-ware in practice. New York: Kluwer Publications.
- Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwai, S., Jones, D., Young, B. & Sutton, A. (2005). Synthesising qualitative and quantitative methods: a review of possible methods.
- Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23.
- Gunawardena, C., Carabajal, K., & Lowe, C.A. (2001). Critical analysis of models and methods used to evaluate online learning networks. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED456159).
- Gunawardena, C., Lowe, C., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(4), 395–429.
- Haughey, M. (2006). Commentary of e-learning review. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 32(3), 111–118.
- Jeong, A. (2004). The effects of communication style and message function in triggering responses and critical discussion in computer-supported collaborative argumentation. Paper in conference proceedings of the Annual meeting of the Association of Educational Communications& Technology, Chicago, IL.
- Kanuka, H. (2005). An exploration into facilitating higher levels of learning in a text-based Internet learning environment using diverse instructional strategies. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 10(3). [online]. Retrieved September 1, 2006, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/kanuka.html
- Kanuka, H. (2006). A review of e-learning in Canada: A rough sketch of the evidence, gaps and promising directions: A commentary. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 32(3), 85–100.
- Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lopez-Islas, (2001). Across-cultural study of group processes and development in online conferences. Distance Education, 22(1), 85–121.
- McKlin, T., Harmon, S.W., Evans, W., & Jones, M.G. (2002). Cognitive presence in web based learning: A
- McLaughlin, C., & Luca, J. (2000). Cognitive engagement and higher order thinking through computer conferencing: We know why but do we know how? Retrieved September 1, 2006, from http://www.lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2000/mcloughlin.html
- Meyer, K.A. (2003). Face-to-face versus threaded discussions: The role of time and higher-order thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 55–65.
- Nussbaum, M., Hartley, K., Sinatra, G.M., Reynolds, R.E., & Bendixen, L.D. (2002). Enhancing the quality of on-line discussions. New Orleans, LA: Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
- Pawan, F., Paulus, T.M., Yalcin, S., & Chang, C-F. (2003). Online learning: Patterns of engagement and interaction among in-service teachers. Language Learning& Technology, 7(3), 119–140. [online]. Retrieved on October 14, 2006 from http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num3/pawan/
- Pena-Shaff, J. (2005). Asynchronous online discussions as a tool for learning: Students’ attitudes, expectations, and perceptions. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16(4), 409–430.
- Pena-Shaff, J., Martin, W., & Gay, G (2001). An epistemological framework for analyzing student interactions in computer-mediated communication environments.
- Rourke, L. (2005). Learning through online discussion. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Alberta,, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
- Rovai, A., & Barnum, K. (2003). Online course effectiveness: An analysis of student interactions and perceptions of learning. Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 57–73.
- Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In T. Koschmann, (Ed.),
- Schwier, R.A. (2006). Commentary on “A review of e-learning in Canada”. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 32(3), 71–83.
- Thomas, M. (2002). Learning within incoherent structures: The space of online discussion forums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18, 351–366.
- Vaughan, N., & Garrison, D.R. (2005). Creating cognitive presence in a blended faculty development community. (1), 1–12.
- Veerman, A., Andriessen, J., & Kanselaar, G. (2000). Learning through synchronous electronic discussion. Computers& Education, 34(3–4), 269–290.
- Wilson, D., Varnhagen, S., Krupa, E., Kasprzak, S., Hunting, V., & Taylor, A. (2003). Instructors’ adaptation to online graduate education in health promotion: A qualitative study. Journal of Distance Education, 18(2), 1–15.
- Yakimovicz, A., & Murphy, K.L. (1995). Constructivism and collaboration on the Internet: Case study of a graduate class experience. Computers in Education, 24(3), 203–209.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact email@example.com.