You are here:

Introducing laptops to children: An examination of ubiquitous computing in Grade 3 reading, language, and mathematics
ARTICLE

, , ,

CJLT Volume 33, Number 3, ISSN 1499-6677 e-ISSN 1499-6677 Publisher: Canadian Network for Innovation in Education

Abstract

This study examines the achievement outcomes accompanying the implementation of a Grade 3 laptop or so-called ubiquitous computing program in a Quebec school district. CAT-3 reading, language, and mathematics batteries were administered at the end of Grade 2 and again at the end of Grade 3, after the first year of computer implementation. Overall gain was found in all three content areas, but was differential when compared with the norms of the CAT-3. Additionally, some evidence suggested a differential gain for lower and middle-level learners during the school year. Teachers were administered an instrument called the Technology Implementation Questionnaire (TIQ) that assessed the purposes and extent of technology integration. Negative correlations were found in reading achievement gain for items associated with the higher use of communicative, evaluative, and creative uses of computers. Open-ended teacher responses indicated the need for more professional support for instructional implementations of computing. Résumé: Cette étude examine les performances accompagnant l’implantation d’un programme d’ordinateurs portables en 3 ième année du primaire, aussi appelé programme d’ubiquité computationnelle, dans une école d’un district scolaire du Québec. Des batteries de tests, CAT-3 en lecture, en langue et en mathématiques ont été administrées à la fin de la deuxième année du primaire et une autre fois à la fin de la troisième année du primaire, après un an d’implantation des ordinateurs. Un gain fut observé dans les trois matières, mais était différencié lorsque comparé aux normes du CAT-3. De plus, un gain différencié fut mis en évidence pour les apprenants de niveau inférieur et moyen durant l’année scolaire. Les enseignants ont rempli le Technology Implementation Questionnaire (TIQ) qui mesure le but et l’étendue de l’intégration technologique. Des corrélations négatives ont été trouvées en gains au niveau de la lecture pour les items associés à l’utilisation de haut niveau des ordinateurs, en communication, en évaluation et en création.

Citation

Bernard, R., Bethel, E., Abrami, P., Wade, C. & Wade, C. (2008). Introducing laptops to children: An examination of ubiquitous computing in Grade 3 reading, language, and mathematics. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 33(3),. Canadian Network for Innovation in Education. Retrieved February 20, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Campbell, D.T. & Stanley, J.C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
  2. Canadian Test Centre. (2002). Canadian Achievement Tests Third Edition (CAT-3): Technical manual. Markham, ON: Canadian Test Centre. CRF & Associates. (2003). The impact of Plato Learning, Inc. Technology in East Rock Magnet School. New Haven, CT: East Rock Magnet School. Retrieved March 24, 2007, from http://www.eastrock.org/downloadfiles/East_rock_impact_study.pdf
  3. Lowther, D., Ross, S., & Morrison, G. (2003). When each one has one: The influences on teaching strategies and student achievement of using laptops in the classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(3), 23-44.
  4. Mitchell Institute. (2004). One-to-one laptops in a high school environment: Piscataquis Community High School study final report. Portland, ME: Mitchell Institute. Retrieved March 24, 2007 from http://www.mitchellinstitute.org/Gates/pdf/One-to-One_Laptops_Report.pdf
  5. Newhouse, P., & Rennie, L. (2001). A longitudinal study of the use of student-owned portable computers in a secondary school. Computers& Education, 36(3), 223-243.
  6. Oppenheimer, T. (2003). The flickering mind: The false promise of technology in the classroom and how learning can be saved. New York: Random House.
  7. Penuel, W. (2006). Implementation and effects of one-to-one computing initiatives: A research synthesis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,38(3), 329.
  8. Russell, M., Bebell, D., & Higgins, J. (2004). Laptop learning: A comparison of teaching and learning in upper elementary classrooms equipped with shared carts of laptops and permanent 1:1 laptops. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30(4), 313-330.
  9. Russell, M., Bebell, D., O'Dwyer, L., & O'Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use: Implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297.
  10. Sclater, J., Sicoly, F., Abrami, P., & Wade, C. (2006). Ubiquitous technology integration in Canadian public schools: Year one study. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 32(1). Retrieved December 13, 2006, from http://www.cjlt.ca/content/vol32.1/sclater.html
  11. Trimmel, M., & Bachmann, J. (2004). Cognitive, social, motivational and health aspects of students in laptop classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(2), 151-158.
  12. Wozney, L., Venkatesh, V., & Abrami, P.C. (2006). Implementing computer technologies: Teachers’ perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 173–207.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Also Read

Related Collections