You are here:

Highly Relevant Mentoring (HRM) as a Faculty Development Model for Web-Based Instruction / Highly Relevant Mentoring (HRM) (mentorat haute efficacité), un modèle de formation du corps professoral à l’enseignement en réseau
ARTICLE

, Nipissing University ; , Laurentian University ; , Nipissing University ; , British Columbia Institute of Technology ; , , University of Northern British Columbia

CJLT Volume 38, Number 1, ISSN 1499-6677 e-ISSN 1499-6677 Publisher: Canadian Network for Innovation in Education

Abstract

This paper describes a faculty development model called the highly relevant mentoring (HRM) model; the model includes a framework as well as some practical strategies for meeting the professional development needs of faculty who teach web-based courses. The paper further emphasizes the need for faculty and administrative buy-in for HRM and examines relevant theories that may be used to guide HRM in web-based teaching environments. Of note is that HRM was conceived by the instructional design staff who contributed to this paper before the concept of high impact mentoring appeared in the recent literature (2009). While the model is appropriate in various disciplines and professions, the examples and scenarios provided are drawn from a Canadian university’s experience of using HRM, in conjunction with a pedagogical approach called ICARE, in a variety of nursing courses and programs. Cet article décrit un modèle de formation du personnel enseignant intitulé « highly relevant mentoring (HRM) » (mentorat haute efficacité); ce modèle comprend une structure et des stratégies pratiques visant à combler les besoins en formation du corps professoral d’une faculté offrant des cours en réseau. L’article souligne la nécessité d’un appui facultaire et administratif au HRM et étudie les théories pertinentes pouvant servir à guider le HRM dans des milieux d’enseignement en réseau. On notera que le HRM a été conçu par l’équipe de conception de matériel pédagogique qui a contribué à cet article avant l’apparition, dans les publications récentes (2009), du concept de « high impact mentoring » (mentorat à haut rendement). Bien que ce dernier modèle convienne à diverses disciplines et professions, les exemples et les scénarios fournis ici sont tirés de l’expérience d’utilisation du HRM dans une université canadienne, conjointement à une approche pédagogique appelée ICARE, dans une variété de cours et de programmes de sciences infirmières.

Citation

Carter, L., Salyers, V., Page, A., Williams, L., Albl, L., Hofsink, C. & Hofsink, C. (2012). Highly Relevant Mentoring (HRM) as a Faculty Development Model for Web-Based Instruction / Highly Relevant Mentoring (HRM) (mentorat haute efficacité), un modèle de formation du corps professoral à l’enseignement en réseau. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology / La revue canadienne de l’apprentissage et de la technologie, 38(1),. Canadian Network for Innovation in Education. Retrieved February 22, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Albright, M., & Nworie, J. (2008). Rethinking academic technology leadership in an era of change. Educause Quarterly, 31(1). Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/EDUCAUSEQuarterlyMagazineVolum/ RethinkingAcademicTechnologyLe/162512
  2. Baker, M., Boggs, R., & Arabasz, P. (2003). Student and faculty perspectives on e-learning support. Educause Center for Applied Research; Research Bulletin, 16. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERB0316.pdf
  3. Benner, P. (1984). From novice to expert: Excellence and power in clinical nursing practice. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
  4. Benner, P. (2004). Using the Dreyfus model of skill acquisition to describe and interpret skill acquisition and clinical judgment in nursing practice and education. Bulletin of Science Technology Society, 24(3), 188-199.
  5. Berge, Z.L., & Kendrick A.A. (2005). Can interest in distance training be sustained incorporate organizations? International Journal of Instructional Technology& Distance Learning, 2(2). Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Feb_05/article05.htm
  6. Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199231.
  7. Butler, D.L. & Winne, P.H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245-281.
  8. Cowan, J. (1998). On becoming an innovative university teacher. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press. Cravener, P. (1999, July/August). Piloting the psychosocial model of faculty development. The Technology Source. Retrieved from http://technologysource.org/article/piloting_the_psychosocial_model_of_faculty_developm Ent
  9. Diaz, V., Garrett, P., Kinley, E., Moore, J., Schwartz, C., Kohrman, P. (2009). Faculty development for the 21st century. Educause Review, 44(3), 46-55.
  10. Eraut, M. (2000). Non-formal learning and tacit knowledge in professional work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(1), 113-136.
  11. Fang, B. (2007). A performance-based development model for online faculty. Performance Improvement, 46(5), 17-24.
  12. Goodland, J. (1990). Teachers for our nation’s schools. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  13. Hawkey, K. (1997). Roles, responsibilities, and relationships in mentoring: A literature review and agenda for research. Journal of Teacher Education, 48(5), 325-35.
  14. Kim, H.Y., & Bonk, C.J. (2010, August). Toward best practices in online teaching: Instructional immediacy in online faculty experiences. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 7(8). Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Aug_10/article02.htm
  15. Knight, P., Tait, J., & Yorke, M. (2006). The professional learning of teachers in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 319-339.
  16. Kolb, E.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as a source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  17. Kreber, C., Castleden, H., Erfani, N., & Wright, T. (2005). Self-regulated learning about university teaching: An exploratory study. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(1), 75.
  18. Kreber, C., & Cranton, P.A. (2000). Exploring the scholarship of teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 71(4), 476–495.
  19. Novak, G.M., & Middendorf, J. (2002). Just-in-time teaching: Using web technology to increase student learning. Connexions Online, 14(1). Retrieved from http://as.clayton.edu/henry/JiTT.htm
  20. Perry, N, Phillips, L, & Hutchinson, L. (2006). Mentoring student teachers to support selfregulated learning. The Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 237-254.
  21. Reddekopp, C. (2006). Multitasking and student learning possible explanations for a growing phenomenon. Retrieved from http://www.usask.ca/education/coursework/802papers/redekopp/index.htm
  22. Rickard, W. (1999). Technology, education, and the changing nature of resistance. Educom Review 34(1), 42-45.
  23. Salyers, V., Carter, L., Barrett, P., & Williams, L. (2010). Evaluating student and faculty satisfaction with a pedagogical framework. Journal of Distance Education/Revue de l'Éducation à Distance, 24(3). Retrieved from http://www.jofde.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/695/1145
  24. Salyers, V. (2005). Web-enhanced and face-to-face classroom instructional methods: Effects on course outcomes and student satisfaction. International Journal of Nursing Education Scholarship, 2(1), Article 29, 1-13.
  25. Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Highly Relevant Mentoring 13
  26. Shepherd, C., Alpert, M., & Koeller, M. (2007). Increasing the efficacy of educators teaching online. International Journal of Human and Natural Sciences, 2(3), 172-178.
  27. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. New York, NY: John Wiley& Sons.
  28. Sorcinelli, M.D., Austin, A., Eddy, P., & Beach A. (2006). Creating the future of faculty development: Learning from the past, understanding the present. San Francisco: JosseyBass.
  29. Taylor, A., & McQuiggan, C. (2008). Faculty development programming: If we build it, will they come? Educause Quarterly, 31(3). Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/EDUCAUSEQuarterlyMagazineVolum/ FacultyDevelopmentProgrammingI/163099
  30. Thompson, D. (2006). Informal faculty mentoring as a component of learning to teach online: An exploratory study. Online journal of distance learning administration, 9(3). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall93/thompson93.htm
  31. Winne, P.H., & Perry, N.E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531-566). Orlando, FL:

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.