You are here:

Ethnicity and Student Perceptions on Effectiveness, Accessibility, and Preferabilty of Online Courses.:
PROCEEDINGS

, , , , Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, United States

Global Learn, in Melbourne, Australia ISBN 978-1-880094-85-3 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Abstract

This research suggests that willingness to engage with others through electronic communication and a preference towards self-managed learning represent at least two important learner dispositional characteristics that may predict success with collaborative e-learning. This suggestion that important student e-learning preference characteristics include a willingness to participate in collaborative-learning, and a preference towards self-managed learning, is consistent with other work on students' learning preferences as they relate to flexible delivery and distance education. . The current paper will focus on the dispositional variables that influence student preferences for E-learning engagement.Research seeks to identify the relationship between individual student perceptions on effectiveness, accessibility, and preferabilty of E-learning courses.

Citation

Moseley, B., Pruitt, W., Ngoyi, L. & Jennings, S. (2011). Ethnicity and Student Perceptions on Effectiveness, Accessibility, and Preferabilty of Online Courses.:. In S. Barton, J. Hedberg & K. Suzuki (Eds.), Proceedings of Global Learn Asia Pacific 2011--Global Conference on Learning and Technology (pp. 2008-2020). Melbourne, Australia: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 27, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Alexander, J.W., Polyakova-Norwood, V., Johnston, L.W., Christensen, P., & Loquist, R.S.(2003). Collaborative development and evaluation of an online nursing course. Distance Education, 24, 41-56.
  2. Cuthrell, K. & Lyon, A. (2007). Instructional strategies: What do E-learning students prefer? MERLOTJournal of E-learning Learning and Teaching, 3(4), 357-362 (http://jolt.merlot.org/documents/cuthrell.pdf)
  3. Dennen, V. (2008). Pedagogical lurking: Student engagement in non-posting discussion behavior Computers in Human Behavior, 24(4), 1624-1633.
  4. Ellis, T. & Cohen, M. (2005). Building the better asynchronous computer mediated
  5. Glass, J., & Sue, V. (2008). Student preferences, satisfaction, and perceived learning in an Elearning mathematics class. MERLOT Journal of E-learning Learning and Teaching, 4(3), 325-338.
  6. Saadé, R.G. (2003). Web-based education information system for enhanced learning, EISL:
  7. Schulz-Hamsa, I. (1998). Inclusion and technology: A marriage of convenience for educational
  8. Steele, D.J., Jodi, P.E., Lynch, T.G., & Lacy, N.L. (2002). Learning preferences, computer
  9. Pelz, B. (2004). Three principles of effective E-learning pedagogy. JALN 8(3), retrieved May 2008 from http://www.sloan-C.org/publications/JALN/v8n3/v8n3_pelz.asp
  10. Wagner, N., Hassanein, K., & Head, M. (2008). Who is responsible for E-Learning Success in
  11. Yi, M., & Hwang, Y. (2003). Predicting the use of web-based information systems: Selfefficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.