You are here:

Use of laptops by preservice teachers at the university: Does it help or hinder initial teacher training? PROCEEDINGS

, University of Montreal, Canada ; , University of Quebec in Montreal, Canada

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Nashville, Tennessee, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-84-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

Many studies have touted the undeniable advantages of laptops in classrooms: among other reasons cited in the literature, they provide greater information access, allow better collaboration among learners, and facilitate learning management. However, few, if any, studies have actually looked at the challenges and problems of the regular use of laptops by students in the classroom. This paper presents the results of a multi-case study with the objectives to (1) draw a portrait of laptop use by preservice teachers; and (2) determine the impact of laptop use on the quality of teaching and learning for preservice teachers. To do so, we sought to answer a number of questions. What are the main problems that university professors face? How can students be persuaded to focus on learning tasks? How do students actually used laptops in the classroom? Do they pay attention to the professor? What are some potential pedagogical solutions? We conclude with some recommendations for universities and university professors.

Citation

Karsenti, T. & Collin, S. (2011). Use of laptops by preservice teachers at the university: Does it help or hinder initial teacher training?. In M. Koehler & P. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2011--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 398-402). Nashville, Tennessee, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved November 15, 2018 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Anderson, P. (2007, February). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. (Report prepared for The Joint Information Systems Committee). Retrieved October 24, 2010 from: www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf).
  2. Cochrane, T. (2006). Learning with wireless mobile devices and social software. In L. Markauskaite, P. Goodyear& P. Reimann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 23rd Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (pp. 143 – 146).
  3. Karsenti, T. (2003). Problématiques actuelles et axes de recherche prioritaires dans le domaine des technologies de l’ information et de la communication (TIC) en contexte africain. Research report presented to the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) of Canada. Ottawa: IDRC. L’
  4. McLester, S. (2007). Technology literacy and the MySpace generation. Technology& Learning. Retrieved from: http://www.techlearning.com/article/7074
  5. Newhouse, P., & Rennie, L. (2001). A longitudinal study of the use of student-owned portable computers in a secondary school. Computers& Education, 36(3), 223 – 243.
  6. OCDE (2004). Completing the foundation for lifelong learning– An OECD survey of upper secondary schools. Paris: OCDE.
  7. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1 – 6.
  8. Redecker, C. (2009). Review of learning 2.0 practices: Study on the impact of Web 2.0 innovations on education and training in Europe. Seville: European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.
  9. Siemens, G., & Tittenberger, P. (2009). Handbook of emerging technologies for learning. Winnipeg:
  10. Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press. (cid:1)

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.