You are here:

Scaling-up an Educational Robotics Intervention for Informal Learning Environments

, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, United States ; , University of Nebraska at Omaha, United States ; , , University of Nebraska-Lincoln, United States

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Honolulu, HI, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-73-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC


Past research has shown that educational robotics, when paired with geospatial technologies and taught in an informal educational environment, can be an innovative strategy to teach youth about science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) concepts. While the interventions have been shown to have the potential to increase STEM content knowledge, such interventions are often equipment or resource heavy and serve relatively few children. Therefore this study examined the scaling-up of a 4-H Robotics intervention from 38 participants to 147. The 147 youth (ages 10-15) participated in the study in one of six summer camps held in Nebraska during 2008. Results indicated that participants scored higher on the posttest than the pretest. However, not all camps sites had significant increases in test scores.


Barker, B., Grandgenett, N., Nugent, G. & Adamchuk, V. (2009). Scaling-up an Educational Robotics Intervention for Informal Learning Environments. In G. Siemens & C. Fulford (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2009--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 3231-3236). Honolulu, HI, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 20, 2019 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Barker, B. & Ansorge, J. (2007). Robotics as means to increase achievement scores in an informal learning environment. Journal of Research on Technology Education 39(3), 229-243.
  2. Barker, B., Nugent, G., Grandgenett, N., Hampton, A. (2008) Examining 4-H Robotics in the Learning of Science, Engineering and Technology Topics and the Related Student Attitudes. Journal of Youth Development: Bridging Research and Practice Volume 2(3). On-line:
  3. Coburn, C. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change. Educational Researcher 32, 6 (3-12).
  4. Dede, C. (2006). Scaling Up: Evolving Innovations beyond Ideal Settings to Challenging Contexts of Practice. In R.K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, pp. 551-566. Cambridge, England: Cambridge
  5. Nourbakhsh, I., Crowley, K., Bhave, A., Hamner, E., Hsium, T., Perez-Bergquist, A., Richards, S. & Wilkinson, K. (2005). The robotic autonomy mobile robots course: Robot design, curriculum design, and educational assessment. Autonomous Robots, 18(1), 103-127.
  6. Wanner, S. & Kerski, J. (1999). The effectiveness of GIS in high school education. Paper presented at the ESRI 1999 users conference. Available at:

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact