You are here:

Preparing Preservice Teachers for 21st Century Classrooms: Transforming Attitudes and Behaviors About Innovative Technology Article

, , , Arizona State University, United States

Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Volume 17, Number 3, ISSN 1059-7069 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA


Keeping-up with progressing technology tools has been a troublesome issue for educational technology instructors for over ten years as they endeavor to prepare beginning teachers to integrate technology in their future classrooms. This paper promotes instructors’ ideas about behaviors of 21st century teachers, and explores efforts to support their preservice teachers to join this rank. In this qualitative study, three instructors report the results of implementing a new project, the Innovations Mini-Teach, into their course. Overall findings indicated that preservice teachers in this study 1) used a variety of strategies to learn new innovations well enough to teach or model their use to classmates, 2) expressed both a lack of confidence and lack of awareness of confidence-building experiences but indicated their confidence was strengthened by deeper understanding of the usefulness of tools and their abilities to collaborate with peers, and 3) felt they could use technology in their future classrooms, especially those who taught the innovation to others. Based on these findings implications for future research are also addressed.


Williams, M.K., Foulger, T.S. & Wetzel, K. (2009). Preparing Preservice Teachers for 21st Century Classrooms: Transforming Attitudes and Behaviors About Innovative Technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 17(3), 393-418. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved July 22, 2018 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Ashton, J. & Newman, L. (2006) An unfinished symphony: 21st century teacher education using knowledge creating heutagogies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(6), 825-840.
  2. Casner-Lotto, J., & Barrington, L. (2006). Are they really ready for work? Report commissioned by The Conference Board, Corporate Voices for Working Families, the Partnership for 21st Century Skills, and the Society for Human Resource Management.
  3. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. NewYork: Norton.
  4. Fullan, M., & Stiegelbauer, S.M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
  5. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2006). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  6. Kelley, M., Wetzel, K., Padgett, H, Williams, M. K., & Odom, M. (2003). Early childhood teacher preparation and technology integration: The Arizona State University West experience. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education. [Online serial], 3(1). Available: Krueger, R. A. (1998). Analyzing and reporting focus group results. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  7. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Moursund, D. G. (1997). The future of information technology in education. Retrieved October 22, 2007, from
  8. Moursund, D. G. (2005). Planning, forecasting, and inventing your computers-in-education future. Second Edition. Retrieved October 22, 2007, from
  9. Moursund, D. G. (2007). A faculty member’s guide to computers in higher education. Retrieved October 22, 2007, from
  10. National Center on Education and the Economy. (2007). Tough choices or tough times. The Report of the new Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  11. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Public Law 107–110. 107th U. S. Congress (2002). November, A. (2007). Allen November interviews Dr. Yong Zaho, Parts 1-3. Retrieved February 15, 2008, from
  12. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2007). Statement of principles: Twenty-first century skills and the reauthorization of NCLB/ESEA. Retrieved December 20, 2007, from
  13. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  14. Researchware. (2007). HyperRESEARCH. Randolph, MA: Researchware.
  15. Rhodes, F. (2001). The creation of the future: The role of the American university. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  16. Sarason, S. (1996). Revisiting the culture of the school and the problem of change. New York: Teachers College Press.
  17. Strudler, N., & Grove, K. J. (2002). Integrating technology into teacher candidates’ field experiences: A two-pronged approach. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 19(2), 33–39.
  18. (2007). SurveyMonkey. Software available October 3, 2007, from
  19. Wetzel, K., Wilhelm, L., & Williams, M. K. (2004). The introductory technology course: A tool for technology integration. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education [Online serial], 3(4). Available:
  20. Windschitl, M. (2002). Framing constructivism in practice as the negotiation of dilemmas: An analysis of the conceptual, pedagogical, cultural, and political challenges facing teachers. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 131-175.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact