You are here:

Perceptions, Competencies, and Ways of Learning ICT Usage of K-12 Teachers in Turkey
PROCEEDINGS

, Purdue University, United States ; , , Middle East Technical University, Turkey

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Orlando, FL USA ISBN 978-1-880094-60-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the current state of ICT perceptions, competencies, and the way of acquiring ICT competencies of K-12 teachers. The primary design model of this study is a mixed method approach which utilized a questionnaire and interviews. The questionnaire was distributed to 69 schools in 35 provinces in 12 regions of Turkey with a representative sampling method. The questionnaire was distributed to the 3,353 K-12 teachers requesting their participation in completing the questionnaire, and 1,429 teachers responded the questionnaire. For interviews, 6 K-12 teachers of the target population were chosen from Ankara first through convenience sampling and then purposeful sampling methods by using the criterion technique. The findings indicated that majority of K-12 teachers believe that learning and teaching with ICT can be more effective than without ICT, and they are competent in only basic ICT applications.

Citation

Goktas, Y., Yildirim, Z. & Yildirim, S. (2006). Perceptions, Competencies, and Ways of Learning ICT Usage of K-12 Teachers in Turkey. In E. Pearson & P. Bohman (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2006--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 3027-3033). Orlando, FL USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 20, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J.D., and Smaldino, S.S. (2002). Instructional Media and Technologies for Learning. New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
  2. ISTE. (2004). National Educational Technology Standards. Retrieved December, 2004, from http://cnets.iste.org
  3. Karsenti, T., Brodeur, M., Deaudelin, C., Larose, F., & Tardif, M. (2002). Integration ICT’s in Teacher Tr@ in ing: A Challenging Balance. Paper presented a t the symposium “Information Technology and Learning” of Pan-Canadian Education Research Agenda, Montreal, Quebec.
  4. MirandaNet. (2000). Teachers as innovators: An evaluation of the motivation of teachers toUse ICT. Preston, Cox& Cox.
  5. MONE. (2004). Milli Eg itim Sayisal Veriler 2003-2004. Milli Eg itim Bakanlig i Ara s t irma, Planlama ve Koordinasyon Kurulu Bas kanlg i. Ankara: MEB Yay imlar Dairesi Ba s kanligi.
  6. Morse, J.M. & Richards, L. (2002). Readme First for a Users Guide to Qualitative Methods, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  7. Orhun, E. (2000). Turkiye ’ d e Eg i t imde B i l i sim Teknolojileri Yenilig i: Izm ir’de Bai i Ok ullarda Ya i i lan B ir Ara st i rma. Ankara, Turkiye Bilis im Derneg i Yay in la r i.
  8. Queitzsch, M. (1997). "The Northwest Regional Profile: Integration of Technology in PreService Teacher Education Programs" SITE 98-Proceedings.
  9. SCRTEC. (1998). Technology and Preservice Teacher Education Program Survey. Retrieved February, 2005, from http://eeducation.tamu.edu/ihe/ Smith, T.C. (2002). An Analysis of Teacher Educators and Technology Integration Projects at Four Universities. Unpublished Phd. D. Thesis, Arizona State University.
  10. Zayim, N. (2004). Instructional Technology Adoption of Medical School Faculty in Teaching and Learning: Faculty Characteristics and Differentiating Factors in Adopter Categories. Unpub l ished Ph. D. Thesis, METU, Ankara.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.