You are here:

Cultural Differences in Using Search-and-Retrieval Technologies in E-Learning Contexts: An Exploratory Study of Arab and North American Learners’ Use of Topic Maps
PROCEEDINGS

, , , , , , Concordia University, Canada

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Montreal, Canada ISBN 978-1-880094-56-3 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

This paper follows up on studies reported in Dicks et al.(EdMedia 2004) and Shaw et al. (ELearn 2004), both of which focused on improving the reliability and efficiency in current database-oriented search-and-retrieval mechanisms in e-learning applications through the use of topic map technology (ISO/IEC 13250). In the present investigation, we compare two groups, namely, Arab and North American graduate learners' use of topic maps in searching for online resources to complete an essay assignment. The development of our topic maps is grounded in a theory of cognitive information-processing and information retrieval. Sources of data include (a) hard data drawn from observations, tracking of search-related steps, and results of searches; and (b) soft data concerning judgments of utility of information and user's understandings of the search process. We expect the results to indicate differences in precision and recall-related measures between the two groups, as well as illuminate qualitative aspects of how culture might explain differences in information-seeking behaviors.

Citation

Venkatesh, V., Sanjakdar, R., Shaw, S., Dicks, D., Lowerison, G. & Zhang, D. (2005). Cultural Differences in Using Search-and-Retrieval Technologies in E-Learning Contexts: An Exploratory Study of Arab and North American Learners’ Use of Topic Maps. In P. Kommers & G. Richards (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2005--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 4694-4699). Montreal, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 22, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Ahmed K. (2002). Topic maps: A practical introduction with case studies. Retrieved December 17, 2003 from www.techquila.com/bcase.html
  2. Altarriba, J. (1993). Cognition and culture: Across-cultural approach to cognitive psychology. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
  3. Altingovde, I.S., Ozel, S.A., Ulusoy, O., Ozsoyoglu, G., Ozsoyoglu, Z.M. (2001). Topic –centric querying of web information resources. Retrieved December 17, 2003 from http://www.cs.bilken T/edu/tr/~oulusoy/dexa01.ps
  4. Atkinson, R.C., & Shiffrin, R.M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K.W. Spence and J.T. Spence (Eds.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory (Vol. 2, pp. 90-197).
  5. Bandholtz. T (2002). A taxi in knowledge land. Paper presented at XML Europe 2002 Conference: Barcelona, Spain. Retrieved December 17, 2003 from http://www.idealliance.org/papers/xmle02/dx_xmle02/papers/03-05-03/03-05-03.html
  6. Beier, J. & Tesche, T. (2000). Navigation and interaction in medical knowledge spaces using topic maps. International Congress Series, 1230, 384-388.
  7. Chau, M., Zeng, D., & Chen, H. (2001). Personalized spiders for web search and analysis. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries: Roanoke, VA.
  8. Degler, D. & Battle, L. (2003). Can topic maps describe context for enterprise-wide applications? Proceedings of Extreme Markup Languages 2003: Montreal, Canada.
  9. Dicks, D., Venkatesh, V., Shaw, S., Zhang, D., & Lowerison. G. (2004). An empirical evaluation of topic map search capabilities in an educational context. Paper presented at the Annual Ed-Media World Conference on Educational Media, Hypermedia and Telecommunications: Lugano, Switzerland.
  10. Freese, E. (2002). So why aren’t topic maps ruling the world? Proceedings of Extreme Markup Languages 2002: Montreal, Canada.
  11. Freese, E. (2003). Taking topic maps to the Nth dimension. Proceedings of Extreme Markup Languages 2003: Montreal, Canada.
  12. Hunting, S. (2002). Topic maps/pattern languages: An approach to supporting community-based inter-island conversations. Retrieved December 17, 2003 from http://www.etopicality.com/public_papers/ND/ND_WhitePaper_02-11-01.htmlIivonen,M.,Sonnerwald,D.H.,Parma,M.&Poole-Kober,E.(1998).Analyzingandunderstandingculturaldifferences:Experiencesfromeducationinlibraryandinformationstudies.RetrievedDecember20,2004fromwww.ifla.org/IV/ifla64/077-155e.htm
  13. Kabel, S., de Hoog, R., Wielinga, R.S. And Anjewierden, A. (2004).The added value of task, ontology –based markup for information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55 (4), 348-382.
  14. Le, V. & Mason, J.D. (2002). Topic maps for managing classification guidance. Proceedings of Extreme Markup Languages 2002: Montreal, Canada. Lee, W. &Tsai, T. (2003). An interactive agent-based system for concept-based web search. Expert systems with Applications 24 (4), 365-373.
  15. Lewis, R.D. (1996). When cultures collide: Managing successfully across cultures. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
  16. Mendes, M.E.S., Martinez, M. & Sacks, L. (2002). Knowledge-based content navigation in e-learning applications. Retrieved December 17, 2003 from http://www.ee.ucl.ac.uk/lcs/papers2002/./LCS115.pdf Nagao, K., Shirai, Y., & Squire, K. (2002). Semantic annotation and transcoding: Making web content more accessible. IEEE Multimedia, 8 (2), 69-81.
  17. Nishikawa, M. (2002). Organizing information in a corporate intranet: A use case for published and internal-use subjects in topic maps. Proceedings of Extreme Markup Languages 2002: Montreal, Quebec.
  18. Ogievetsky, N. & Badger, T. (2003). Topic map solutions for Kodak digital camera accessories. Proceedings of the XML Europe 2003 Conference. Retrieved December 17, 2003 from http://www.idealliance.org/papers/dx_xmle03/papers/02-03Osana, H.P., Tucker, B.J., & Bennett, T. (2003). Exploring adolescent decision making about equity: Ill-structured problem solving in social studies. Contemporary Educational Psychology,28 (3), 357-383.
  19. Ozmutlu S., Spink A., & Ozmutlu, H. (2003). Multimedia web searching trends: 1997-2001. Information Processing& Management, 39, 611-621.
  20. Passin, T. (2003). Browser bookmark management with topic maps. Proceedings of Extreme Markup Languages 2003: Montreal, Canada.
  21. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 189-206.
  22. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1993). Reasoning in explanation-based decision making. Cognition, 49, 123-163.
  23. Pepper, S. (2002). The TAO of topic maps. Retrieved December 17, 2003 from www.ontopia.net/topicmaps/materials/tao.html
  24. Rath, H.H. (2000). Topic maps: Templates, topology, and type hierarchies. Markup Languages: Theory& Practice, 2 (1), 45-64.
  25. Reitman, W. (1965). Cognition and thought. New York: John Wiley.
  26. Schweiger, R., Hoelzer, S., Rudolf, D., Rieger, J., & Dudeck, J. (2003). Linking clinical data using XML topic maps. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 28, 105-115.
  27. Shaw, S. & Sanjakdar, R. (2004). How Applicable Are North American Web Design Standards Across Cultures: A Comparison of Preferences of North American Users, Arab Users, and Designers Producing Content for Arab Audiences. Paper presented at the Eleventh International Literacy and Education Research Network Conference on Learning: Havana, Cuba.
  28. Shaw, S., Venkatesh, V., Dicks, D., Lowerison, G., & Zhang, D. (2003). Topic maps: User-friendly search engines for broadband applications. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia: Montreal, Canada.
  29. Shaw S., Venkatesh, V., Lowerison, G., Dicks, D., & Zhang, D. (2004). Search-and-retrieval tools in E-learning applications: An empirical comparison of search engines and topic maps in an educational context. Paper presented at ELearn 2004: Washington, DC.
  30. Torney-Purta, J. (1992). Cognitive representations of the political system in adolescents: The continuum from pre-novice to expert. In H. Haste & J. Torney-Purta (Eds.), The Development of Political Understanding: A New Perspective (pp. 1125).
  31. Vaughan L. & Thelwall. M. (2004). Search engine coverage bias: Evidence and possible cause. Information Processing& Management, 40 (4), 693-707.
  32. Voss, J.F. (1998). On the representation of problems: An information-processing approach to foreign policy decision making. In D.A. Sylvan & J.F. Voss, Problem Representation in Foreign Policy Decision Making (pp. 8-26). Cambridge, UK:
  33. Voss, J.F., Wiley, J., Kennet, J., Schooler, T.E., & Silfies, L.N. (1998). Representations of the Gulf crisis as derived from the U.S. Senate debate. In D.A. Sylvan & J.F. Voss, Problem Representation in Foreign Policy Decision Making (pp. 279-302). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Supporting Research Literacy Using Topic Maps: Building a Mathematics Education Research Ontology

    Fei Shu & Emily Sheepy, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada

    E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2013 (Oct 21, 2013) pp. 2524–2529

  2. Theoretical and Practical Implications of Using Topic Map Technologies in E-Learning Applications

    Vivek Venkatesh, Concordia University, Canada

    E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2007 (Oct 15, 2007) pp. 1311–1319

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.