#
To add or to multiply? An investigation of the role of preference in children's solutions of word problems
ARTICLE

## Tine Degrande, Lieven Verschaffel, Wim Van Dooren

Learning and Instruction Volume 61, Number 1, ISSN 0959-4752 Publisher: Elsevier Ltd

## Abstract

Previous research has shown that upper primary school children frequently erroneously solve additive word problems multiplicatively, while younger children frequently erroneously solve multiplicative word problems additively. It has been suggested that children's preference for additive or multiplicative relations explains these errors, besides their lacking skills, but this claim has not been tested empirically yet. Therefore, we administered four test instruments (a word problem test, a preference test, and two tests measuring additive and multiplicative computation and discrimination skill) to 246 third to sixth graders. Previous research results on errors in word problems, as well as on preference were replicated and systematized. Further, they were extended by explaining this erroneous word problem solving behavior by preference, for those children who unmistakably had acquired the necessary computation and discrimination skills. This finding provides strong evidence for the unique additional role of children's preference in erroneous additive or multiplicative word problem solving behavior.

## Citation

Degrande, T., Verschaffel, L. & Van Dooren, W. (2019). To add or to multiply? An investigation of the role of preference in children's solutions of word problems. Learning and Instruction, 61(1), 60-71. Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved January 20, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/207479/.

This record was imported from Learning and Instruction on March 15, 2019. Learning and Instruction is a publication of Elsevier.

Full text is availabe on Science Direct: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.01.002### Keywords

## References

View References & Citations Map- Bailey, D.H., Littlefield, A., & Geary, D.C. (2012). The codevelopment of skill at and preference for use of retrieval-based processes for solving addition problems: Individual and sex differences from first to sixth graders. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, pp. 78-92.
- Behr, M., & Harel, G. (1990). Understanding the multiplicative structure. Proceedings of the 14th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education: Vol 3 (pp. 27-34). Mexico, Mexico: Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Technologia, Gobierno del Estado de Morelos.
- Blum, W., & Niss, M. (1991). Applied mathematical problem solving, modelling, applications, and links to other subjects: State, trends, and issues in mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, pp. 37-68.
- Boyer, T.W., Levine, S.C., & Huttenlocher, J. (2008). Development of proportional reasoning: Where young children go wrong. Developmental Psychology, 44, pp. 1478-1490.
- Clark, F.B., & Kamii, C. (1996). Identification of multiplicative thinking in children in grades 1-5. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, pp. 41-51.
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education. London, UK: Routledge.
- Cramer, K., & Post, T. (1993). Connecting research to teaching proportional reasoning. Mathematics Teacher, 86, pp. 404-407.
- Cramer, K., Post, T., & Currier, S. (1993). Learning and teaching ratio and proportion: Research implications. Research ideas for the classroom: Middle grades mathematics, pp. 159-178. New York, NY: Macmillan.
- Degrande, T., Van Hoof, J., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2018). Open word problems: Taking the additive or the multiplicative road?. ZDM Mathematics Education, 50, pp. 91-102.
- Degrande, T., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2017). Spontaneous focusing on quantitative relations: Towards a characterization. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 19, pp. 260-275.
- Degrande, T., Verschaffel, L., & Van Dooren, W. (2018). Beyond additive and multiplicative reasoning abilities: How preference enters the picture. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 33, pp. 559-576.
- Deloof, G. (2005). Leerlingvolgsysteem: Wiskunde – Toetsen 6 Basisboek. Antwerpen, Belgium: Garant.
- Dudal, P. (2002). Leerlingvolgsysteem: Wiskunde – Toetsen 3 Basisboek. Leuven, Belgium: Garant.
- Dudal, P. (2003). Leerlingvolgsysteem: Wiskunde – Toetsen 4 Basisboek. Antwerpen, Belgium: Garant.
- Dudal, P., & Deloof, G. (2004). Leerlingvolgsysteem: Wiskunde – Toetsen 5 Basisboek. Antwerpen, Belgium: Garant.
- English, L.D. (1997). Promoting a problem-posing classroom. Teaching Children Mathematics, 4, pp. 172-179.
- English, L.D., & Lesh, R.A. (2003). Ends-in-view problems. Beyond constructivism: A models and modeling perspective on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching, pp. 297-316. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Fernández, C., Llinares, S., Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2012). The development of students' use of additive and proportional methods along primary and secondary school. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27, pp. 421-438.
- Fischbein, R., Deri, M., Nello, M., & Marino, M. (1985). The role of implicit models in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16, pp. 3-17.
- Greer, B. (1992). Multiplication and division as models of situations. Handbook of research on learning and teaching mathematics, pp. 276-295. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- Greer, B., De Bock, D., & Van Dooren, W. (2009). The ISIS problem and pre-service teachers' ideas about proof. ICMI study 19 conference proceedings, pp. 184-189. Taipei, Taiwan: National Taiwan Normal University.
- Haciomeroglu, E.S., Chicken, E., & Dixon, J.K. (2013). Relationships between gender, cognitive ability, preference and calculus performance. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 15, pp. 175-189.
- Harel, G., & Behr, M. (1989). Structure and hierarchy of missing value proportion problems and their representations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 8, pp. 77-119.
- Hart, K. (1981). Ratio and proportion. Children's understanding of mathematics, Vols. 11– 16, pp. 88-101. London, UK: John Murray.
- Heller, P., Ahlgren, A., Post, T., Behr, M., & Lesh, R. (1989). Proportional reasoning: The effect of two context variables, rate type and problem setting. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26, pp. 205-220.
- Hoffer, A. (1988). Ratios and proportional thinking. Teaching mathematics in grades K-8: Research based methods, pp. 285-313. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
- Inglis, M., & Aberdein, A. (2015). Beauty is not simplicity: An analysis of mathematicians' proof appraisals. Philosophia Mathematica, 23, pp. 87-109.
- Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking for childhood to adolescence. London, UK: Routledge.
- Jeong, Y., Levine, S., & Huttenlocher, J. (2007). The development of proportional reasoning: Effect of continuous vs. discrete quantities. Journal of Cognition and Development, 8, pp. 237-256.
- Kaput, J.J., & West, M.M. (1994). Missing-value proportional reasoning problems: Factors affecting informal reasoning patterns. The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics, pp. 235-287. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
- Karplus, R., Pulos, S., & Stage, E. (1983). Proportional reasoning of early adolescents. Acquisition of mathematical concepts and processes, pp. 45-89. New York, NY: Academic Press.
- Lamon, S.J. (1993). Ratio and proportion: Connecting content and children's thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, pp. 41-61.
- Lamon, S.J. (2008). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding: Essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
- Lamon, S.J., & Lesh, R. (1992). Interpreting responses to problems with several levels and types of correct answers. Assessment of authentic performance in school mathematics, pp. 319-342. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science Press.
- Lemaire, P., & Siegler, R.S. (1995). Four aspects of strategic change: Contributions to children's learning of multiplication. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 124, pp. 83-97.
- Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1988). Proportional reasoning. Number concepts and operations in the middle grades, pp. 93-118. Reston, VA: Lawrence Erlbaum & National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- Modestou, M., & Gagatsis, A. (2010). Cognitive and metacognitive aspects of proportional reasoning. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12, pp. 36-53.
- Mulligan, J. (1992). Children's solutions to multiplication and division word problems: A longitudinal study. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 4, pp. 24-41.
- Noelting, G. (1980). The development of proportional reasoning and the ratio concept: Part 1. Differentiation of stages. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 11, pp. 217-253.
- Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2010). Understanding relations and their graphical representation. Available online: http://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/defaukt/files/P4.pdf.
- Nunes, T., Bryant, P., Barros, R., & Sylva, K. (2012). The relative importance of two different mathematical abilities to mathematical achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, pp. 136-156.
- Nunes, T., Bryant, P., Evans, D., & Barros, R. (2015). Assessing quantitative reasoning in young children. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 17, pp. 178-196.
- Pellegrino, J.W., & Glaser, R. (1982). Analyzing aptitudes for learning: Inductive reasoning. Advances in instructional psychology, Vol. 2, pp. 269-345. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Resnick, L.B., & Singer, J.A. (1993). Protoquantitative origins of ratio reasoning. Rational numbers: An integration of research, pp. 107-130. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Schukajlow, S., Krug, A., & Rakoczy, K. (2015). Effects of prompting multiple solutions for modelling problems on students' performance. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89, pp. 393-417.
- Siemon, D., Breed, M., & Virgona, J. (2005). From additive to multiplicative thinking: The big challenge of the middle years. Proceedings of the 42nd conference of the mathematical association of victoria, pp. 278-286. Melbourne, Australia: Mathematical Association of Victoria.
- Silver, E.A. (1995). The nature and use of open problems in mathematics education: Mathematical and pedagogical perspectives. ZDM/International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 2, pp. 67-72.
- Thompson, P.W., & Saldanha, L. (2003). Fractions and multiplicative reasoning. Research companion to the NCTM standards, pp. 95-113. Washington, DC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- Torbeyns, J., & Verschaffel, L. (2013). Efficient and flexible strategy use on multi-digit sums: A choice/no-choice study. Research in Mathematics Education, 15, pp. 129-140.
- Tourniaire, F., & Pulos, S. (1985). Proportional reasoning: A review of the literature. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16, pp. 181-204.
- Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Evers, M., & Verschaffel, L. (2009). Students' overuse of proportionality on missing-value problems: How numbers may change solutions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 40, pp. 187-211.
- Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). From addition to multiplication … and back. The development of students' additive and multiplicative reasoning skills. Cognition and Instruction, 28, pp. 360-381.
- Van Dooren, W., De Bock, D., Vleugels, K., & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Just answering . . . or thinking? Contrasting pupils' solutions and classifications of proportional and non-proportional word problems. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12, pp. 20-35.
- Van Dooren, W., Vamvakoussi, X., & Verschaffel, L. (2018). Proportional reasoning. Educational Practice Series, 30, pp. 1-34.
- Van Dooren, W., Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Bock, D. (2006). Modelling for life: Developing adaptive expertise in mathematical modelling from an early age. Instructional psychology: Past, present and future trends. Sixteen essays in honour of Erik De Corte, pp. 91-112. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
- Van Dooren, W., Verschaffel, L., & Onghena, P. (2002). The impact of preservice teachers' content knowledge on their evaluation of students' strategies for solving arithmetic and algebra word problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33, pp. 319-351.
- Vergnaud, G. (1983). Multiplicative structures. Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes, pp. 127-174. New York, NY: Academic Press.
- Vergnaud, G. (1988). Multiplicative structures. Number concepts and operations in the middle grades, pp. 141-161. Reston, VA: Lawrence Erlbaum & National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000). Making sense of word problems. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
- Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2007). Whole number concepts and operations. Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, pp. 557-628. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References