You are here:

Student performance, attrition, and class size given missing student data
ARTICLE

,

Economics of Education Review Volume 20, Number 4 ISSN 0272-7757 Publisher: Elsevier Ltd

Abstract

Class size is of particular interest to education researchers and administrators because it is one of the few variables that administrators can change from term to term. In studies of class size, however, little if any attention is given to the consequence of missing student records that result from “data cleaning” done by those collecting the data, student unwillingness to provide data, or students self-selecting out of the study and the implications of this selection on an appropriate measure of class size. These shortcomings are addressed here: class size and other class-specific variables that may affect student learning of economics are considered along with the hazard of attrition between the pre-course test and the post-course test and students' failure to complete questionnaires about themselves and the courses. Contrary to studies that have used an average or an end-of-term class size measure and find no class-size effect, beginning class size is found to be significant and negatively related to learning of economics, all else equal. In part, this is the result of students in larger classes being significantly more likely than students in smaller classes to withdraw from the course before taking the posttest.

Citation

Becker, W.E. & Powers, J.R. Student performance, attrition, and class size given missing student data. Economics of Education Review, 20(4), 377-388. Elsevier Ltd. Retrieved September 17, 2019 from .

This record was imported from Economics of Education Review on March 1, 2019. Economics of Education Review is a publication of Elsevier.

Full text is availabe on Science Direct: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(00)00060-1

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References