You are here:

Social Media and Electronic Networking Use and Preferences among Undergraduate Turf Science Students
ARTICLE

,

Natural Sciences Education Volume 45, Number 1, ISSN 2168-8281

Abstract

Most undergraduate students arrive on campus fluent in electronic communication methods and social media (SM). This cultural or communication shift presents both opportunities and challenges in pedagogy. Social media allows users to share and network with geographically diverse individuals and has the potential for engaging students both inside and outside of the classroom. Used inappropriately, SM may be a disruption and distraction to a classroom environment and academic progress. With so many undergraduates using SM, and the potential for engaging students with SM, a survey was conducted to assess student SM utilization and preferences. The survey was administered to >300 undergraduates enrolled in turf science over 2 consecutive years. The results supported the hypothesis that a very high percent, >95%, of students are using electronic technologies and SM to communicate. Students indicated that the SM application they used most was Facebook, but the number using Twitter was rising. Their primary reason for using SM was, "To keep in touch with family and friends" and students were increasingly accessing SM on mobile devices. Although most students are using electronic communication methods, the majority indicated they still "prefer" to communicate with friends and family face-to-face or in person. These results have direct implications on learning environments and provide insight for educators attempting to engage their students, perhaps by incorporating SM into their instructional techniques and content delivery.

Citation

Bigelow, C.A. & Kaminski, J.E. (2016). Social Media and Electronic Networking Use and Preferences among Undergraduate Turf Science Students. Natural Sciences Education, 45(1),. Retrieved December 7, 2019 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on January 10, 2019. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords