Leadership in Educational Technology
Journal of Educational Technology Volume 10, Number 4, ISSN 0973-0559
In life, one will come across diverse types of leaders. While each leadership type has positive and negative qualities, each style fits appropriately in distinct situations. Supervisors must determine how to manage their staff in constructive ways, engaging and motivating them to learn more and do more within their specific professional area. The purpose of this research is to define the various types of Educational Leadership and their pros and cons, compare and contrast various ways to manage educators, how to engage others, and to identify best practices in Educational Technology. The writer will also define professional learning networks/communities and identify their purpose. Questions involved with this research include: What are the various kinds of leaders and the pros and cons that apply to those leadership styles? How can Educational Technology superiors effectively manage their staff? How can they motivate their staff? What are PLNs/PLCs and why are they important? The conclusion of this work will highlight the importance of technology leaders within the educational realm.
Puckett, R. (2014). Leadership in Educational Technology. Journal of Educational Technology, 10(4), 1-5.
Cited ByView References & Citations Map
Weishen Wu, Da Yeh University, Taiwan; Huey-Por Chang, National Changhua University of Education, Taiwan; Chorng-Jee Guo, National Taitung University, Taiwan
Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching Vol. 27, No. 4 (October 2008) pp. 499–520
An Investigation of Hispanic Student Achievement in Elementary School Mathematics through the Use of a Computer-Assisted Instruction Receptive/Expressive Language Model
Jane Strickland, A. W. Srickland, Corey Schou & Sue Schou, Idaho State University, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2005 (Jun 27, 2005) pp. 3331–3335
An Investigation of Hispanic Student Achievement in Elementary School Mathematics through the Use of a Computer-Assisted Instruction Receptive/Expressive Language Model.
Jane Strickland, Idaho State University, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2005 (Jun 27, 2005) pp. 361–365
Stephanie Huffman, University of Central Arkansas, United States; Wendy Rickman, University of Central Arkansa, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2003 (2003) pp. 1297–1300
Amy Baylor, Florida State Univ., United States; Donn Ritchie, San Diego State Univ., United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2001 (2001) pp. 2666–2671
Linda Espey, Heartland Area Education Agency and Drake University, Iowa, United States
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2000 (2000) pp. 95–100
Gulsun Kurubacak & T. Volkan Yuzer, Anadolu University, Open Education Faculty, Turkey
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2004 (2004) pp. 2360–2367
Stephen J. Farenga, The City University of New York, United States; Beverly A. Joyce, Dowling College, United States
Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 9, No. 3 (2001) pp. 313–319
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact email@example.com.