Mistaking the Tool for the Outcome: Using Activity System Theory to understand the Complexity of Teacher Technophobia
PROCEEDINGS
Margaret Lloyd, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Australia ; Peter Albion, University of Southern Queensland (USQ), Australia
Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Phoenix, AZ, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-55-6 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA
Abstract
The blame for the reputed failure of schools to embrace information and communication technologies (ICT) and the relegation of new technologies to the periphery of school life is frequently placed directly on the technophobic teacher. In this paper, we question this simplistic and singular placement of blame on such individuals and, in so doing, address the complexity of teacher beliefs and dispositions. In revisiting interview data and mapping against activity system theory, we have discerned a common misconception among technophobic teachers of "othering" technology and believing classroom integration to be concerned with teaching about, rather than with or through, ICT. We cautiously conclude that those perceived as technophobic are in fact mistaking the tool for the outcome and that the problem of teacher technophobia is a misunderstanding of the roles of the components within the activity system.
Citation
Lloyd, M. & Albion, P. (2005). Mistaking the Tool for the Outcome: Using Activity System Theory to understand the Complexity of Teacher Technophobia. In C. Crawford, R. Carlsen, I. Gibson, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2005--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1480-1487). Phoenix, AZ, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 19, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/19250/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Abbott, C. (2001). ICT: Changing education. London: Routledge Falmer.
- Albion, P. (1999). Self-efficacy beliefs as an indicator of teachers’ preparedness for teaching with technology. Technology and Teacher Education Annual 1999, (Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education). (CDROM edition).
- Backhouse, B. (2003). Information and communication technology integration: Beyond the early adopters. TechTrends, 47(3), 59.
- Bailey, B. (2000). The impact of mandated change on teachers. In N. Bascia & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), The sharp edge of educational change (pp. 112-128). London: Routledge Falmer.
- Beavers, D. (2001). Professional development: Outside the workshop box. Principal Leadership (High School Ed), 1(9), pp. 4346.
- Bolter, J.D. (1996). Virtual reality and the redefinition of self. In L. Strate (Ed.), Communications in cyberspace (pp. 105-120).
- Davis, M., & Eslinger, D. (2001). Acquisition of computer skills and practices by K-8 classroom teachers. Contemporary Education, 72(2), 5-10.
- Day, C., & Roberts-Holmes, G. (1998). The best of times, the worst of times: Stories of change and professional development in England. Change: Transformations in Education, 1(1), 15-31.
- Dwyer, D. (1995). Changing the conversation about teaching, learning and technology: A report on 10 years of ACOT research. Cupertino, CA: Apple Computer.
- Engestrom, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: OrietaKonsultit.
- Eraut, M., Pearce, J., Stanley, A., & Steadman, S. (1991). Whole school IT development. Kent IT in Schools Support Team, Sittingbourne.
- Gergen, K.L. (1991). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: Harper Collins.
- Gillman, T. (1989). Change in public education: A technological perspective (Trends and Issues Series 1). ERIC ClearingHouse on Educational Management, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.
- Guskey, T.R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15, 5-12.
- Hall, G. & Hord, S. (1987). Change in schools: Facilitating the process. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
- Hodas, S. (1997). Technology refusal and the organizational culture of schools. Retrieved March 9, 2002 from http://olam.ed.asu.edu/epaa/v1n10.html.
- Jonasen, D. (1996). Computers in the classroom: Mindtools for critical thinking. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
- Jonscher, C. (2000). Wiredlife: Who are we in the digital age? London: Anchor.
- King, K. (2002) A journey of transformation: A model of educators’ learning experiences in educational technology. Paper presented at the Adult Education Research Conference, Raleigh NC, May. ED 472069.
- Lloyd, M., & McRobbie, C. (2003). Investigation of the practicum model of professional development of teachers in ICT at Kawungan LDC-ICT. Commissioned Report, Education Queensland.
- Lloyd, M., & Yelland, N. (2003, May). Adaptation and avoidance: Observations of teachers’ reactions to information and communications technology in the classroom. Change: Transformation in Education, 6(1), 81-96.
- Maslen, G. (1995, August 8). Information rich, information poor. The Bulletin, pp. 12-15. Mevarech, Z.. (1997. The U-Curve process that trainee teaches experience in integrating computers into the curriculum. In D. Passey & B. Samways (Eds.), Information technology: Supporting change through teacher education (pp. 46-51).
- Oliver, R. (1994). Factors influencing beginning teachers’ uptake of computers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 2(1), 71-89.
- Postman, N. (1995). The end of education: Redefining the value of education. New York: Vintage.
- Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
- Romeo, G., & Walker, I. (2001). Using Activity Theory to investigate the implementation of ICTE in a primary school. Paper presented at WCCE2001, Copenhagen, August 2001.
- Russell, A. (1995). Stages in learning new technology: Naïve adult email users. Computer education, 25(4), 173-178.
- Turkle, S. (1984). The second self: Computers and the human spirit. London: Granada.
- Turkle, S. (1996). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
- University of Helsinki. (2001). Center for activity theory and developmental work research. Retrieved September 28, 2001 from http://www.edu.helsinki.fi/activity.
- Watson, D. (2001). Pedagogy before technology: Re-thinking the relationship between ICT and teaching. Education and Information technologies, 6(4), 251-266.
- Wertsch, J. (1981) (Ed.). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. White Plains, NY: M. Sharpe.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to ReferencesCited By
View References & Citations Map-
Altered Geometry: A New Angle on Teacher Technophobia
Margaret Lloyd, Queensland University of Technology, Australia; Peter Albion, University of Southern Queensland, Australia
Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 17, No. 1 (January 2009) pp. 65–84
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.