You are here:

An Instructional Feedback Technique for Teaching Project Management Tools Aligned With PMBOK
ARTICLE

, , ,

IEEE Transactions on Education Volume 61, Number 2, ISSN 0018-9359

Abstract

Contribution: An approach is presented to provide contextualized feedback for students using a project management (PM) tool. This approach covers the ten PM knowledge areas, guiding students through the planning of software projects. Background: Because software PM is unfeasible without the support of a PM tool there is a growing demand that these tools be taught in the higher education computer courses. Hence, several approaches already have been proposed to improve this teaching, such as educational PM tools or simulators, which facilitate the application of specific PM techniques and the treatment of their results. Another approach to improve the teaching of PM tools is instructional feedback, but little information is as yet available on how to provide instructional feedback when teaching software PM. Intended Outcomes: Instructional feedback, essential to helping students to learn, is based on an evaluation of their actions and decisions. To take advantage of this instructional approach, this paper proposes an instructional feedback technique to be employed in an instructional unit (IU) teaching PM tools aligned with the project management body of knowledge. Application Design: This technique was evaluated through an experiment carried out in undergraduate computer courses. Control and experiential groups were exposed to the same IU, with only the experiential group using the instructional feedback technique. Findings: The proposed feedback technique contributes to student learning, meeting students' need for better explanations to acquire a comprehensive understanding of PM theory and its practice.

Citation

Goncalves, R.Q., von Wangenheim, C.A.G., Hauck, J.C.R. & Zanella, A. (2018). An Instructional Feedback Technique for Teaching Project Management Tools Aligned With PMBOK. IEEE Transactions on Education, 61(2), 143-150. Retrieved January 28, 2023 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on January 9, 2019. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords