You are here:

The Paradox of Acceptance and Rejection: The Perception of Healthcare Professional Students about Mobile Learning Acceptance in Iran University of Medical Sciences
ARTICLE

, ,

Qualitative Research in Education Volume 7, Number 2,

Abstract

A qualitative study was conducted to explore the perception of healthcare professional students about mobile learning acceptance. Method: The study was performed using a conventional content analysis method. The subjects were the students of medical sciences in Iran University of Medical Science. Sampling was based on a purposeful sampling method. Twenty-three students took part in semi-structured interviews until data saturation was reached. Results: The main theme was "the paradox of acceptance and rejection" with three categories; (1) perceived attraction (sub-categories: learning with the excitement of entertainment, the attraction of multimedia learning environment and enthusiasm for electronic learning); (2) perceived ease (sub-categories: easy access to information anytime and anywhere and easy and effortless use); and (3) perceived conflict (sub-categories: teachers' contradictory behavioral patterns, contradiction about value of online information, friends' contradictory behavioral patterns, and digital gap between generations in family). Conclusion: The three categories found in the study placed the students in a dilemma of using or not using mobile learning. They had doubts about accepting mobile technology as a legitimate educational tool. Taking these factors into account and managing them can pave the way for mobile learning in the students.

Citation

Koohestani, H.R., Arabshahi, S.K.S. & Ahmadi, F. (2018). The Paradox of Acceptance and Rejection: The Perception of Healthcare Professional Students about Mobile Learning Acceptance in Iran University of Medical Sciences. Qualitative Research in Education, 7(2), 144-169. Retrieved February 23, 2019 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on January 9, 2019. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords