You are here:

Improving School Safety in the E-Learning Era
PROCEEDING

, , The University of Texas at El Paso, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Las Vegas, NV, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-35-3 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Abstract

This paper presents a framework for addressing the challenges that arise when implementing technologies intended to improve school safety during the current e-learning era. The general consensus arising from the professional security community is that school administrators should invest in sophisticated technologies that help school staff to decrease violence via a multi-staged approach to safety. Specifically, the recommended framework for implementing technologies that improve school safety has four stages of protection, which in a crisis serve as phases for action: (1) deter violence before it occurs, (2) detect violence when it does occur, (3) delay the severity of any violence that is occurring, so that security officers can (4) respond to the violence with force until it is stopped. By employing an integrated suite of technologies that are collectively designed to decrease school violence, the four-stage framework can help to improve school safety in the contemporary e-learning era, both in terms of the number of school violence cases and the severity of those cases.

Citation

Hernandez, E.A. & Tillman, D.A. (2018). Improving School Safety in the E-Learning Era. In Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 356-360). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 17, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Chipley, M., Lyon W., Smilowitz, R., Williams, P., Arnold C., Blewett, W., Hazen, L., & Krimgold, F. (2012). Primer to Design Safe School Projects in Case of Terrorist Attacks and School Shootings. Buildings and Infrastructure Protection Series. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Homeland Security, FEMA-428/BIPS07/January. Retrieved from https://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/st/bips07_428_schools.pdf
  2. Gastic, B. & Johnson D. (2015) Disproportionality in Daily Metal Detector Student Searches in U.S. Public Schools, Journal of School Violence, 14:3, 299-315. Retrieved from https://0-www-tandfonlinecom.lib.utep.edu/doi/pdf/
  3. Green, M.W. (1999). National Institute of Justice Research Report, NCJ 178265, The Appropriate and Effective Use of Security Technologies in U.S. Schools, September 1999. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/school/state.html
  4. Holt, L. (Producer). (2018, February 20). NBC Nightly News. Inside the safest school in America. Video retrieved from https://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news/video/inside-the-safest-school-in-america-1166029891710
  5. Portable PTZ Security Unit (2018). Retrieved from http://v5systems.us/products_types/edge-security/ Schneider, T. (2001). Newer Technologies for School Security. Eric Digest 145:2. (2010). School Security Technologies. Washington, D.C.: National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED449550
  6. Sprague, J. (2007). Creating Schoolwide Prevention and Intervention Strategies. The Hamilton Fish Institute on School and Community Violence and Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. Retrieved from https://cpb-use1.wpmucdn.com/blogs.gwu.edu/dist/9/552/files/2014/05/sprague_creatingschoolwideprevention.pdf
  7. Stephens, K., & Office of Safe and Drug-Free Schools. (2011). Social Media in School Emergency Management: Using New Media Technology to Improve Emergency Management Communications. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED543578.pdf

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Slides