You are here:

OER Awareness and Use: The Affinity Between Higher Education and K-12 ARTICLE

, Centre for Distance Education - Athabasca University

IRRODL Volume 19, Number 2, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press


Educators within Higher Education (HE) and K-12 share in the need for high quality educational resources to assist in the pursuit of teaching and learning. Although there are numerous differences between the two levels of education, there are commonalties in the perceptions of the purpose, practical uses, and challenges that abide in the use of Open Educational Resources (OER). Observations made while producing podcasts and videos for OER awareness, use, and championing, form an exposition of the merits of OER for HE and K-12. Benefits include cost-savings in acquiring resources for teaching and learning as well as user-generated content, instructor creativity, and contextualized and responsively timely learning opportunities. Additionally, the teaching culture of K-12 has historically supported the sharing of learning activities and learning resources. At all levels of education, OER awareness requires a deeper understanding of the changes to teaching and learning borne by open educational practices.


Blomgren, C. (2018). OER Awareness and Use: The Affinity Between Higher Education and K-12. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(2),. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved October 20, 2018 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Alberta Education. (2010). Making a difference: Meeting diverse learning needs with differentiated instruction. Edmonton, AB: Author. Retrieved from
  2. Alberta Education. (2013). Learning and technology policy framework. Retrieved from
  3. Alberta Education. (2016). The guiding framework for the design and development of kindergarten to grade 12 provincial curriculum. Retrieved from
  4. Alberta Education. (2017). Individualized program plan overview. Retrieved from
  5. Bailey, A., Davis, P., Henry, T., & Loureiro, K. (2014, January 30). The digital disruption of educational publishing [Blog post]. Retrieved from
  6. Batson, T., Paharia, N., & Kumar, M.V. (2008). A Harvest Too Large? A Framework for Educational
  7. Bray, B., & McClaskey, K. (2012). Personalization vs differentiation vs individualization. Retrieved from
  8. Calgary Board of Education. (2012). Making teaching& Learning visible: Resource guide personalized learning. Retrieved from
  9. Caster, B., & Hautala, R. (2008). Changing our brains: Transforming a traditional view of scholarship and teaching. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 18.
  10. Ehlers, U.D. (2011). Extending the territory: From open educational resources to open educational practices. Journal of Open Flexible and Distance Learning, 15(2), 1-10.
  11. Geist, M. (2016). False alarms: Examining the misleading claims about the state of canadian publishers [Blog post]. Retrieved from
  12. Jhangiani, R.S., Pitt, R., Hendricks, C., Key, J., & Lalonde, C. (2016). Exploring faculty use of open
  13. Kimmons, R. (2016). Expansive openness in teacher practice [Abstract]. Teachers College Record, 118(9).
  14. Koch, J.V. (2006). An economic analysis of textbook pricing and textbook markets. ACSFA College
  15. Lee, S.D. (2008). The gates are shut: Technical and cultural barriers to open education. In T. Iiyoshi & 68 Blomgren
  16. Lessig, L. (2008). Remix: Making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. New York: Penguin.
  17. Levin, D. (2016, August 7). Dear students and faculty: Please go digital [Blog post]. Retrieved from
  18. Macfarlane, B. (2016). Collegiality and performativity in a competitive academic culture. Higher Education Review, 48(2).
  19. Molnar, M. (2016, February 14). Amazon education to launch new website for open education resources [Blog post]. Retrieved from
  20. Petrides, L., Jimes, C., Middleton‐Detzner, C., Walling, J., & Weiss, S. (2011). Open textbook adoption and use: implications for teachers and learners. Open Learning, 26(1), 39-49. Doi:10.1080/02680513.2011.538563
  21. Rejskind, G. (2000). TAG teachers: Only the creative need apply. Roeper Review, 22(3), 153-157.
  22. Roediger, H.L. (2004, May). Writing textbooks: Why doesn’t it count? [Blog post]. Retrieved from
  23. Rollans, G., & De la Chenelière, M., Department of Canadian Heritage. (2010). Study of the Canadian K to 12 educational book publishing sector. Retrieved from Canadian Heritage
  24. Senack, E. (2014). Fixing the broken textbook market: How students respond to high textbook cost and demand alternatives. Retrieved from
  25. Senack, E. (2016, August 31). Textbooks costa lot. Here’s why [Blog post]. Retrieved from
  26. Starr-Glass, D. (2011). Reconsidering Boyer's reconsideration: Paradigms, sharing, and engagement. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5(2).
  27. Truth and Reconciliation Commission. (2015). Calls to action. Retrieved from
  28. United States Department of Education. (2015, October 29). U.S. Department of Education Launches
  29. Wiley, D. (2014, March 5). The access compromise and the 5th R [Blog post]. Retrieved from

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact