You are here:

Increasing Technology Usage Throughout Teacher Preparation: The Importance of Preservice Teachers' Acceptance
PROCEEDING

, NC State University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Washington, D.C., United States ISBN 978-1-939797-32-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

This paper examines the need for fully integrated, meaningful use of information and communication technology (ICT) in teacher preparation programs. To strengthen pre-service teachers’ application of technological and pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK), teacher education programs can use the technology acceptance model (TAM) to facilitate students’ positive perceptions of technology usage in the classroom, and thereby have a greater impact on pre-service teachers’ intention and ability to effectively use ICT for teaching and learning in their own classrooms.

Citation

Davis, R. (2018). Increasing Technology Usage Throughout Teacher Preparation: The Importance of Preservice Teachers' Acceptance. In E. Langran & J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2019-2024). Washington, D.C., United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 26, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Alenezi, A. (2017). Obstacles for teachers to integrate technology with instruction. Education and Information Technologies, 22(4).
  2. Archambault, L., Wetzel, K., Foulger, T., & Williams, M. (2010). Professional development 2.0. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(1), 4-11.
  3. Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
  4. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., & Warshaw, P.R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
  5. DeGennaro, D. (2010). Grounded in theory: Immersing pre-service teachers in technology-mediated learning. Contemporary Issue in Technology and Teacher Education, 10(3).
  6. Forssell, K. (2011). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: Relationships to learning ecologies and social learning networks. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.
  7. George, A., & Sanders, M. (2017). Evaluating the potential of teacher-designed technology-based tasks for meaningful learning: Identifying needs for professional development. Education and Information Technologies, 22(6), 2781-2895.
  8. Golas, J. (2010). Effective teacher preparation programs: Bridging the gap between educational technology availability and its utilization. International Forum of Teaching and Studies, 6(1), 18-67.
  9. Graham, C.R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers and Education, 57, 1953-1960.
  10. Harris, J.B., & Hofer, M.J. (2017). "TPACK stories": Schools and school districts repurposing a theoretical construct for technology-related professional development. Journal for Research on Technology in Education, 49(1), 1-2.
  11. Harvey, D.M., & Caro, R. (2017). Building TPACK in pre-service teachers through explicit course design. TechTrends, 61(2), 106-114.
  12. Hoffer, M., & Grandgenett, N. (2012). TPACK development in a teacher education: A longitudinal study of pre-service teachers in a secondary M.A.Ed. Program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(1), 83-106.
  13. Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., & Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? The Journal of Education, 193(3), 13-19.
  14. Lai, C. (2015). Modeling teachers' influence on learners' self-directed use of technology for language learning outside the classroom. Computers& Education, 82(Supplement C), 74-83.
  15. Lambert, J., Gong, Y., & Cuper, P. (2008). Technology, transfer, and teaching: The impact of a single technology course on preservice teachers' computer attitudes and ability. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(4), 385-410.
  16. Lu, L. (2014). Cultivating reflective practitioners in technology preparation: Constructing TPACK through reflection. Education Sciences, 4(1), 13-35.
  17. López-Vargas, O., Duarte-Suárez, L., & Ibáñez-Ibáñez, J. (2017). Teacher's computer self-efficacy and its relationship with cognitive style and TPACK. Improving Schools, 20(3), 264-277.
  18. Matthews, D. (2017). 'Fear of looking stupid' Anthropologist offers explanation for why faculty members hesitate to adopt innovative teaching methods. Times Higher Education.
  19. McMurtie, B. (2017). Why faculty members still aren't sure what to make of education technology. The Chronicle of Higher Education.
  20. Mouza, C., & Karchmer-Klein, R. (2013). Promoting and assessing pre-service teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in the context of case development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 48(2), 127-152.
  21. Palak, D., & Walls, R.T. (2009). Teachers' beliefs and technology practices. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 417-441.
  22. Pamuk, S. (2012). Understanding pre-service teachers' technology use through TPACK framework. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(5), 425-439.
  23. Prins, G.T., Bulte, A.M., & Pilot, A. (2016). An activity-based instructional framework for transforming authentic modeling practices into meaningful contexts for learning in science education. Science Education, 100(6), 1092-1123.
  24. Rosenberg, J.M., & Koehler, M.J. (2015). Context and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(3), 186-210.
  25. Selwyn, N. (2012). School 2.0: Rethinking the Future of Schools in the Digital Age. In A. Jimoyiannis (Ed.), Research on eLearning and ICT in Education. New York, NY: Springer.
  26. Sun, Y., Strobel, J., & Newby, T.J. (2017). The impact of student teaching experience on pre-service teachers' readiness for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 597-629.
  27. Swallow, M.J., & Olofson, M.W. (2017). Contextual understandings in the TPACK framework. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(3), 228.
  28. Teo, T. (2009). Modeling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers& Education, 52(2), 302-312.
  29. Teo, T. (2010). Examining the influence of subjective norm and facilitating conditions on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modeling of an extended technology acceptance model. AsiaPacific Education Review, 11(2), 253-262.
  30. Teo, T., & Noyes, J. (2011). An assessment of the influence of perceived enjoyment and attitude on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers& Education, 57(2), 1645-1653.
  31. Teo, T., Lee, C.B., & Chai, C.S. (2008). Understanding pre-service teachers' computer attitudes: Applying and extending the technology acceptance model. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 128-143.
  32. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers& Education, 59(1), 134-144.
  33. Veletsianos, G., & Moe, R. (2017). The rise of educational technology as a sociocultural and ideological phenomenon. Educause Review.
  34. Yerdelen-Damar, S., Boz, Y., & Aydin-Gunbatar, S. (2017). Mediated effects of technology competencies and experiences on relations among attitudes toward technology use, technology ownership, and self-efficacy about technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(4), 394-405.
  35. Young, J., Young, J.L., & Hamilton, C. (2013). The use of confidence intervals as a meta-analytic lens to summarize the effects of teacher education technology courses on pre-service teacher TPACK. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 149.
  36. Yurdakul, I.K., & Coklart, A.N. (2014). Modeling pre-service teachers' TPACK competencies based on ICT usage. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30, 363-376.
  37. Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the Connections Between Campus Courses and Field Experiences in College-and UniversityBased Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 89-99.
  38. Zhou, M., Chun, K.K., & Teo, T. (2016). Modeling mathematics teachers' intention to use the dynamic geometry environments in Macau: A SEM approach. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 19(3), 181-193.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Slides