You are here:

Making Coding Instruction Accessible to All Students
PROCEEDING

, , University of Michigan-Dearborn, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Washington, D.C., United States ISBN 978-1-939797-32-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

Coding instruction within K-12 schools continues to expand across the country However, students with disabilities are underrepresented when it comes to coding instruction within the general education classroom This session will introduce participants to coding curriculum accessible to middle school students with disabilities and engage them in coding related hands-on activities

Citation

Brunvand, S. & Hill, D. (2018). Making Coding Instruction Accessible to All Students. In E. Langran & J. Borup (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1985-1987). Washington, D.C., United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 17, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Calder, N. (2010). Using Scratch: an integrated problem-solving approach to mathematical thinking. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 15(4), 9–14.
  2. Capper, C.A., & Frattura, E.M. (2009). Meeting the Needs of Students of ALL Abilities: How Leaders Go Beyond Inclusion. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  3. Courduff, J., Szapkiw, A., & Wendt, J.L. (2016). Grounded in What Works. Journal of Special Education Technology, 31(1), 26–38. ., & Cook, A. (2003). The effect of computers on student writing: A meta-analysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2(1), 3-51.
  4. Lai, A., Yang, S. (2011). The learning effect of visualized programming learning on 6th graders’ problem solving and logical reasoning abilities. In: International Conference on Electrical and Control Engineering (ICECE), 16–18 Sept. 2011, Yichang, 6940–6944.
  5. Lerner, J., & Johns, B. (2009). Learning Disabilities and Related Mild Disabilities (11th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
  6. Levy, H.M. (2008). Meeting the needs of all students through differentiated instruction: Helping every child reach and exceed standards. The ClearingHouse, 81(4), 161-164.
  7. Mercer, C.D., & Mercer, A.R. (2005). Teaching Students with Learning Problems (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  8. Myers, J., & Beach, R. (2004). Constructing critical literacy practices through technology tools and inquiry. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4(3). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol4/iss3/languagearts/article1.cfm Nicolaou, C.T., Nicolaidou, I.A., Zacharia, Z.C., & Constantinou, C.P. (2007). Enhancing fourth graders' ability to interpret graphical representations through the use of microcomputer-based labs implemented within an inquiry-based activity sequence. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 26(1), 75-99.
  9. Schacter, J. (1999). The impact of education technology on student achievement: What the most current research has to say. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Education Technology.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Slides