You are here:

Promising Instructional Practices for English Language Learners
ARTICLE

JITE-IIP Volume 17, Number 1, ISSN 2165-3151 e-ISSN 2165-3151 Publisher: Informing Science Institute

Abstract

Aim/Purpose: The purpose of this exploratory case study was to understand how teachers, working with English Language Learners (ELLs), expanded their knowledge and instructional practices as they implemented a one-to-one iPad® program. Background: English Language Learners experience linguistic, cultural, and cognitive shifts that can be challenging, and at times lead to isolation for ELLs. While technology can be engaging, devices alone do not shift instructional practices, nor lead to student learning. Technology must be leveraged through shifts to pedagogical practice and linked thoughtfully to content goals. Methodology: This research was conducted through a qualitative case study of educators at an international school. Contribution: This study describes promising pedagogical practices for leveraging 1:1 mobile devices for ELLs. Findings: iPads can be a support for ELL students. One-to-one iPads allowed teachers to experiment with new pedagogical approaches, but this development varies greatly between teachers. During the 1:1 implementation there were challenges reported. Recommendations for Practitioners: In order to mitigate some of these challenges, and build on the success of this study, the researcher suggests developing a common vision for technology integration, using collaborative models of ELL teaching, and investing in professional development. Recommendation for Researchers: Researchers should continue to document and observe the learning outcomes of ELL students in 1:1 environments, including an experimental study. Impact on Society: ELLs can benefit from 1:1 technology, and new pedagogical practices. For teachers to implement these new practices conversations on philosophy, engagement with families, and consistent professional development. Future Research: Future research can continue to expand the population of ELL students in 1:1 mobile learning environments; and the most powerful pedagogical practices.

Citation

Prince, J. (2018). Promising Instructional Practices for English Language Learners. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 17(1), 1-21. Informing Science Institute. Retrieved August 17, 2022 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. App Holdings. (2014). A+ Pro [Computer Software]. Retrieved from http://aplusflashcards.weebly.com/
  2. Barr, S., Eslami, Z.R., & Joshi, R.M. (2011). Core strategies to support English language learners. The Educational Forum, 76(1), 105–117.
  3. Bebell, D., & Kay, R. (2010). One to one computing: A summary of the quantitative results from the Berkshire Wireless Learning Initiative. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 9(2), 5–58.
  4. Bialystok, E., & Hakuta, K. (1995). In other words: The science and psychology of second-language acquisition. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  5. Carlo, M., August, D., McLaughlin, B., Snow, C., Dressler, C., Lipman, D., Lively, T., & White, C. (2004). Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English‐language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 188–215.
  6. Carr, J. (2012). Does math achievement h’APP’en when iPads and game-based learning are incorporated into fifth-grade mathematics instruction? Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 11(1), 269–286.
  7. Cheung, A., & Slavin, R.E. (2005). Effective reading programs for English language learners and other language-minority students. Bilingual Research Journal, 29(2), 241–267.
  8. Corbin, J.M., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3–21.
  9. Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry& Research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  10. Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  11. Drayton, B., Falk, J.K., Stroud, R., Hobbs, K., & Hammerman, J. (2010). After installation: Ubiquitous computing and high school science in three experienced, high-technology schools. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 9(3), 5–54.
  12. Esterberg, K.G. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill. Explain Everything (2011) Explain Everything [Computer Software] Retrieved from http://explaineverything.com/
  13. Genlott, A.A., & Grönlund, Å. (2013). Improving literacy skills through learning reading by writing: The iWTR method presented and tested. Computers& Education, 67, 98–104.
  14. Han, W.-J. (2012). Bilingualism and academic achievement. Child Development, 83(1), 300–321.
  15. Inspiration Software, Inc. (2011). Inspiration 7[Compute Software] Retrieved from http://www.inspiration.com/go/ipad
  16. Ireland, G.V., & Woolerton, M. (2010). The impact of the iPad and iPhone on education. Journal of Bunkyo Gakuin University Department of Foreign Languages and Bunkyo Gakuin College (10), 31–48.
  17. Koehler, M., & Mishra, P. (2008). Introducing TPCK. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology (Ed.), Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators (pp. 1–30). New York, NY:
  18. Manfra, M.M. & Hammond, T.C. (2009). Giving, prompting, making: Aligning technology and pedagogy within TPACK for social studies instruction. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(2), 160–185.
  19. Mathison, C., & Billings, E. (2008). The effect of primary language advanced organizer PodCasts on English Language Learners’ academic performance. World Conference on E-Learning inCorporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2008, 2008(1), 138–143.
  20. PrinceMcLeod, S., & Lehmann, C. (2012). What school leaders need to know about digital technologies and social media. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  21. McMillan, J., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
  22. Milman, N.B., Carlson-Bancroft, A., & Boogart, A.V. (2012). IPads in a PreK-4th independent school–Year 1– Enhancing engagement, collaboration, and differentiation across content areas. Paper presented at the International Society for Technology in Education, SanDiego, CA.
  23. O’Dwyer, L., Russell, M., Bebell, D., & Tucker-Seeley, K.R. (2005). Examining the relationship between home and school computer use and students’ English/language arts test scores. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 3(3). Retrieved from http://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/jtla/article/view/1656
  24. Paraiso, J. (2010). Online learning in the middle school ESL classroom. TNTESOL, 3, 22–31.
  25. Patton, M.Q. (2001). Qualitative research& Evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  26. Purcell, K., Heaps, A., Buchanan, J., & Friedrich, L. (2013). How teachers are using technology at home and in their classrooms (Pew Internet& American Life Project). Pew Research Center.
  27. Revelle, G., Reardon, E., Mays Green, M., Betancourt, J., & Kotler, J. (2007). The Use of Mobile Phones to Support Children’s Literacy Learning. In Y. De Kort, W. IJsselsteijn, C. Midden, B. Eggen, & B. Fogg (Eds.), Persuasive technology (Vol. 4744, pp. 253–258). Springer Berlin/Heidelberg. Retrieved from
  28. Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  29. Shapley, K.S., Sheehan, D., Maloney, C., & Caranikas-Walker, F. (2010). Evaluating the implementation fidelity of technology immersion and its relationship with student achievement. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 9(4).
  30. Sheppard, D. (2011). Reading with iPads-the difference makes a difference. Education Today, 11(3) 12-15. Retrieved from http://www.minnisjournals.com.au/articles/ipads%20et%20t3%2011.pdf
  31. Silvernail, D., & Gritter, A. (2007). Maine’s middle school laptop program: Creating better writers (Research Brief). Portland, Maine: University of Southern Maine.
  32. Silvernail, D., Pinkham, C., Wintle, S.E., Walker, L.C., & Bartlett, C.L. (2011). A middle school one-to-one laptop program: The Maine experience. Gorham, ME: Maine Educational Policy Research Institute, University of Southern Maine.
  33. Suhr, K.A., Hernandez, D.A., Grimes, D., & Warschauer, M. (2010). Laptops and fourth grade literacy: Assisting the jump over the fourth-grade slump. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 9(5).
  34. Tasa Graphic Arts. (2016). Puzzling Plates [Computer Software]. Retrieved from http://www.tasagraphicarts.com/apps.html
  35. Wilson, E. (2012). School-based research: A guide for education students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections