You are here:

Does Successful Use of Digital Learning Materials Predict Teachers’ Intention to Use Them Again in the Future?
ARTICLE

, , ,

IRRODL Volume 18, Number 7, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press

Abstract

Do perceptions of success in using digital learning materials (DLMs) regularly (i.e., several times a week) strengthen (or weaken) teachers\u2019 behavioural intentions to use DLMs again? And which psychological factors have a relationship with the intention to use DLMs again? These questions are important in light of stimulating teacher\u2019s use of DLMs. To answer this question, teacher “flows\u201d were analysed using crosstabs and multinomial logistic regression. These flows visualize how teachers go from a certain degree of perceived success to a certain strength of behavioural intention. Second, Hayes (2013) process method and structured equation modeling (SEM) techniques were applied to determine the mediating role of attitude, perceived norm, and perceived behavioural control of perceived success on the behavioural intention. The results suggested that the teachers\u2019 strength in behavioural intention was in accordance with their perceived success for the case that their self-prediction was positive but that this strength became weaker when teachers\u2019 self-prediction was negative. Attitude and perceived norm mediated the effects only when self-prediction was positive whereas perceived behaviour control did this in both cases. Also, there was a direct effect between perceived success and behavioural intention. It is important that teachers get a chance to experience success with the use of DLMs, enabled either by school leaders (regarding in-service teachers) or by teacher training institutions (regarding pre-service teachers). Only then we will see teachers\u2019 willingness to use DLMs on a regular basis to grow.

Citation

Kreijns, K., Vermeulen, M., Buuren, H. & Acker, F. (2017). Does Successful Use of Digital Learning Materials Predict Teachers’ Intention to Use Them Again in the Future?. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(7),. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved February 22, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
  2. Armitage, C.J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499.
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Clinical and Social Psychology, 4, 359–373.
  4. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behaviour: The reasoned action approach.
  5. Hagger, M.S., Chatzisarantis, N., & Biddle, S.J.H. (2001). The influence of self-efficacy and past
  6. Kreijns, K., Vermeulen, M., Van Acker, F., & Van Buuren, H. (2014). Predicting teachers’ use of digital
  7. Ouellette, J.A., & Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behaviour predicts future behaviour. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1), 54–74.
  8. Preacher, K.J., & Hayes, A.F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.