You are here:

Teaching and Learning with Wearable Technologies PROCEEDING

, , , Oslo and Akerhus University College, Norway

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada ISBN 978-1-939797-31-5 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA


This paper presents analysis and findings from a research-driven experimental study that was designed to explore the possibilities and challenges in using wearable computers for supporting learning activities The overall aim of the study was to explore whether the use of data produced by the pupils in physical education lessons could serve to make abstract numbers and figures more contextualised and concrete, and act as a motivational factor in learning mathematics and social science The teacher in this study had all three subjects The teacher had previously expressed concern regarding the pupils’ understanding of mathematical concepts such as graphs, where the pupils had performed badly on national tests Our findings suggest that using wearables in teaching and learning provides pedagogical opportunities in and across subjects However, privacy issues emerged both prior to giving the pupils the watches, as well as during the study


Engen, B.K., Giæver, T.H. & Mifsud, L. (2017). Teaching and Learning with Wearable Technologies. In J. Dron & S. Mishra (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1057-1067). Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved August 17, 2018 from .


View References & Citations Map


  1. Adams Becker, S., Freeman, A., Giesinger Hall, C., Cummins, M., & Yuhnke, B. (2016). NMC/CoSN Horizon Report; 2016 K-12 Edition. Retrieved from Austin, Texas:
  2. Borthwick, A.C., Anderson, C.L., Finsness, E.S., & Foulger, T.S. (2015). Special Article Personal Wearable Technologies in Education: Value or Villain? Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 31(3), 85-92.
  3. Bower, M., & Sturman, D. (2015). What are the educational affordances of wearable technologies? Computers& Education, 88, 343-353. Doi:,T., & Klinger, M.B. (2015). Google Glass: Using Wearable Technologies to Enhance Teaching and Learning. In D. Rutledge& D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference 2015 (pp. 1777-1780). Chesapeake, VA: Association for
  4. Engen, B.K. (2016). Wearable Computers: What’s in It for Schools? Opportunities and Risks. In C.L. Gomez, M.A. Lopez, & T.I. Candel (Eds.), ICERI2016 Proceedings. 9th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation (Vol. 16, pp. 5706-5713). IATED Academy.
  5. Hassoun, D. (2015). “All over the place”: A case study of classroom multitasking and attentional performance. New Media& Society, 17(10), 1680-1695.
  6. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2014). NMC/CoSN Horizon Report; 2014 K-12 Edition. Retrieved from Austin, Texas: Kuzu, E.B., & Demir, K. (2016). Enhancing Learning with Wearable Technologies In and Out of Educational Settings. In S.N. Sad & M. Ebner (Eds.), Digital Tools for Seamless Learning. USA: IGI Global.
  7. Labus, A., Milutinovic, M., Stepanic, Ð., Stevanovic, M., & Milinovic, S. (2015). WEARABLE COMPUTING IN E-EDUCATION. RUO. Revija za Univerzalno Odlicnost, 4(1), A39-A51.
  8. Lee, V.R., Drake, J., & Williamson, K. (2015). Let's Get Physical: K-12 Students Using Wearable Devices to Obtain and Learn About Data from Physical Activities. TechTrends, 59(4), 46-53. Doi:10.1007/s11528015-0870-x
  9. Motti, V.G., & Caine, K. (2015). Users’ Privacy Concerns About Wearables. In M. Brenner, N. Christin, B. Johnson, & K. Rohloff (Eds.), Financial Cryptography and Data Security: FC 2015 International Workshops, BITCOIN, WAHC, and Wearable, San Juan, Puerto Rico, January 30, 2015, Revised Selected Papers (pp. 231-244). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  10. Raij, A., Ghosh, A., Kumar, S., & Srivastava, M. (2011). Privacy risks emerging from the adoption of innocuous wearable sensors in the mobile environment. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Http://
  11. The Norwegian Directorate for Education and Training. (2012). Framework for Basic Skills. Retrieved from df.
  12. Wu, T., Dameff, C., & Tully, J. (2014). Integrating Google Glass into simulation-based training: experiences and future directions. Journal of Biomedical Graphics and Computing, 4(2).
  13. Yamauchi, Y., & Nakasugi, H. (2003). Past viewer: Development of wearable learning system. Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2003, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
  14. Zheng, H., & Genaro Motti, V. (2017). Wearable Life: A Wrist-Worn Application to Assist Students in Special Education. In M. Antona & C. Stephanidis (Eds.), Universal Access in Human–Computer Interaction. Human and Technological Environments: 11th International Conference, UAHCI 2017, Held as Part of HCI International 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 9–14, 2017, Proceedings, Part III (pp. 259276).

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact