You are here:

Parents' Perceptions and Concerns of a 1:1 Laptop Initiative: Implications for Teacher Education
PROCEEDING

, , Iowa State University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Austin, TX, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-27-8 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

Analyzing data gathered from pre- and post-surveys administered during the first year of the implementation, the researchers investigated parents' perceptions and concerns of the 1:1 laptop initiative in a high school context and its implication for the teacher education. Surprisingly, teachers' different beliefs in technology integration and varying levels of TPACK was found to be parents' biggest concerns. Implications for the teacher education are discussed in the paper, as well as suggestions for teacher educators to better prepare pre-service teachers for more productive parent-teacher partnerships.

Citation

Jin, Y. & Schmidt-Crawford, D. (2017). Parents' Perceptions and Concerns of a 1:1 Laptop Initiative: Implications for Teacher Education. In P. Resta & S. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 776-783). Austin, TX, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 25, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Bebell, D., & Kay, R.E. (2010). One to one computing: A summary of the quantitative results from the Berkshire wireless learning initiative. Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 9(2), 4–59.
  2. Broussard, J., Hebert, D., Welch, B., & VanMetre, S. (2014). Teaching today for tomorrow: A case study of one high school’s 1:1 computer adoption. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 80(4), 37–45.
  3. Cox, L.A. (2014). Constructivism examined in a 1:1 Chromebook/Google applications collaborative mobile learning program in the upper Midwest. Available from ProQuest Dissertations& Theses Global.
  4. Epstein, J.L. (2001). School, Family and Community Partnerships: Preparing Educators and Improving Schools. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  5. Federal Communications Commission (2016). Digital textbook playbook. Retrieved from https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-312244A1.pdf Gray, S.F. (2001). A Compilation of State Mandates for Home School Partnership Education in Pre-service Teacher Training Programs. Unpublished manuscript, Pepperdine University.
  6. Greaves, T., & Hayes, J. (2008). America’s Digital Schools: 2008: Six Trends to Watch. Shelton, CT: MDR.
  7. Greaves, T.W., Hayes, J., Wilson, L., Gielniak, M., & Peterson, E.L. (2012). Revolutionizing Education through Technology: The Project RED Roadmap for Transformation. Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education.
  8. Grimes, D. & Warchauer, M. (2008). Learning with laptops: a multimethod case study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(3), 306.
  9. Hill, N.E., & Tyson, D.F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: a meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental psychology, 45(3), 740.
  10. Hur, J.W., Shannon, D., & Wolf, S. (2016). An Investigation of Relationships Between Internal and External Factors Affecting Technology Integration in Classrooms. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 32(3), 105-114.
  11. Inan, F.A. & Lowther, D.L. (2010). Laptops in the K-12 classrooms: Exploring factors impacting instructional use, Computers& Education, 55(3), 937-944.
  12. Jeynes, W. (2012). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of different types of parental involvement programs for urban students. Urban Education, 47(4), 706-742.
  13. Jin, Y. & Crawford, D. (2016, March). Memorization no more: The Design of a blended learning module on integrating technology into social studies classrooms. Paper presented at the Annual Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education Conference, Savannah, GA.
  14. Johnstone, B. (2003). Never Mind the Laptops: Kids, Computers, and the Transformation of Learning. New York: iUniverse Inc.
  15. Lei, J. (2009). Digital natives as preservice teachers: What technology preparation is needed? Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(3), 87-97.
  16. Lei, J. (2010). Conditions for ubiquitous computing: What can be learned from a longitudinal study. Computers in the Schools, 27, 35–53.
  17. Lei, J., & Zhao, Y. (2008). One-to-one computing: what does it bring to schools? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39(2), 97-122.
  18. Lowther, D.L., Inan, F.A., Ross, S.M., & Strahl, J.D. (2012). Do one-to-one initiative bridge the way to 21st century knowledge and skills? Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46, 1–30.
  19. McGrail, E. (2006). “It’s a double-edged sword, this technology business”: Secondary English teachers’ perspectives on a schoolwide laptop technology initiative. Teachers College Record, 108, 1055–1079.
  20. McGrail, E. (2007). Laptop technology and pedagogy in the English language arts classroom. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15, 59–85.
  21. Morrell, E. (2012). Teachers as critical researchers: An empowering model for urban education. Critical Qualitative Research Reader, 548-554.
  22. Mouza, C. (2006). Learning with laptops: the impact of one-to-one computer on student attitudes and classroom perceptions. International Conference on Learning Sciences, 488-494.
  23. Mouza, C. (2008). Learning with laptops: Implementation and outcomes in an urban, underprivileged school. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40, 447–472.
  24. Mouza, C. (2011). Promoting urban teachers’ understanding of technology, content, pedagogy in the context of case development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44(1), 1-29.
  25. National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Digest of Education Statistics: 2014. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d14/ch_7.asp National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Digitally based assessment (DBA)-NAEP's transition to digitally based assessments. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/dba/
  26. Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Glazewski, K., Newby, T., & Ertmer, P. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers& Education, 55(3), 1321-1335.
  27. Owen, A., Farsaii, S., Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2006). Teaching in the one-to-one classroom: It’s not about laptops, it’s about empowerment! Learning and Leading with Technology, 33(2), 12-16.
  28. Rosen, Y., & Beck-Hill, D. (2012). Intertwining digital content and a one-to-one laptop environment in teaching and learning: Lessons from the Time to Know Program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44, 225–241.
  29. Sadaf, A., Newby, T.J., & Ertmer, P.A. (2012). Exploring factors that predict preservice teachers’ intentions to use Web 2.0 technologies using decomposed theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(2), 171-196.
  30. Shapley, K., Sheehan, D., Maloney, C., & Caranikas-Walker, F. (2010). Evaluating the implementation fidelity of technology immersion and its relationship with student achievement. Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 9(4), 4–68.
  31. Shartrand, A.M., Weiss, H.B., Kreider, H.M., & Lopez, M.E. (1997). New skills for new schools: preparing Teachers in Family Involvement. Harvard Family Research Project. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Graduate School of Education.
  32. Shihab, M. (2008). Web 2.0 tools improve teaching and collaboration in English language classes. Presented at the National Educational Computing Conference, San Antonio, TX.
  33. Suhr, K.A., Hernandez, D.A., Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D. (2010). Laptops and fourth-grade literacy: Assisting the jump over the fourth-grade slump. Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 9(5), 1–45.
  34. Teo. T., Chai, S.C., Hung, D., & Lee, C.B. (2008). Beliefs about teaching and uses of technology among preservice teachers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(2), 163-174.
  35. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers& Education, 59(1), 134-144.
  36. Warschauer, M. (2006). Laptops and literacy: Learning in the wireless classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  37. Windschitl, M., & Sahl, K. (2002). Tracing teachers’ use of technology in a laptop computer school: The impact of teacher beliefs, social dynamics, and institutional culture. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 165–205.
  38. Zheng, B., Warschauer, M., Hwang, J., & Collins, P. (2014). Laptop use, interactive science software, and science learning among at-risk students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(4), 1–13.
  39. Zheng, B., Warschauer, M., Lin, C.H., & Chang, C. (2016). Learning in One-to-One Laptop Environments: A Meta-Analysis and Research Synthesis. Review of Educational Research.
  40. Zuber, E., & Anderson, J. (2013). The initial response of secondary mathematics teachers to a one-to-one laptop program. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25, 279–298.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.