You are here:

What are the influences on teacher mobile technology self-efficacy within secondary school classrooms?
ARTICLE

,

  • Full Text
  • Citation
  • Save to Collections
  • E-mail
  • Share
  • OpenURL

    • Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning Volume 20, Number 2, ISSN 1179-7665 e-ISSN 1179-7665 Publisher: Distance Education Association of New Zealand

    Abstract

    As digital technologies develop and change, so do the ways these tools are integrated into classrooms. In particular, as mobile digital technologies become ubiquitous there is a need to investigate how teachers engage with these tools—both personally and professionally. Research has consistently shown that teachers’ underlying beliefs and attitudes (particularly their self-efficacy beliefs) are key elements that influence use and integration of digital technologies in the classroom. In this paper, changes to and factors influencing teachers’ mobile digital technology self-efficacy beliefs, and their subsequent classroom use of devices, are examined in the context of a one-to-one iPad mini device programme in an international school. Results indicate that all of the teacher participants reported an increase in the use of the iPad mini in the classroom, partly as a result of students’ development of collective efficacy. As well as this collective efficacy, which supported the increased use of devices, other factors supported the development of teacher self-efficacy. These included modelling and coaching from colleagues, but mastery (or actual experience) was the foremost contributor to the development of teachers’ mobile technology self-efficacy. This study revealed that allowing teachers time to experience mastery in relation to mobile technology use, and having access to expertise (both colleagues and students), were key elements in building self-efficacy for teachers over time. Perceptions of device value and device affordances were also identified as factors that fostered the development of self-efficacy and subsequent mobile device implementation and use.

    Citation

    Tilton, J. & Hartnett, M. (2016). What are the influences on teacher mobile technology self-efficacy within secondary school classrooms?. Journal of Open, Flexible, and Distance Learning, 20(2), 79-93. Distance Education Association of New Zealand. Retrieved April 20, 2019 from .

    © 2016 Distance Education Association of New Zealand

    Keywords

    View References & Citations Map

    References

    1. Abbit, J., & Klett, M. (2007). Identifying influences on attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs towards technology integration among pre-service educators. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 6, 28–42.
    2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Psychology Review, 84(2), 191–215.
    3. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122–147.
    4. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V.S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). New York: Academic Press.
    5. Bandura, A. (1998). Personal and collective efficacy in human adaptation and change. In J.G. Adair, D. Belanger, & K.L. Dion (Eds.), Advances in psychological science, Vol. 1. Personal, social and cultural aspects. Hove, United Kingdom: Psychology Press.
    6. Bandura, A. (2006). Adolescent development from an agentic perspective. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 1–43): Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
    7. Brown, S., Massey, A., Montoya-Weiss, M., & Burkman, J. (2002). Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 11(4), 283– 295.
    8. Celik, V., & Yesilyurt, E. (2013). Attitudes to technology, perceived computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety as predictors of computer supported education. Computers& Education, 60(1), 148–158. Doi:10.1016/J.compedu.2012.06.008
    9. Chuttur, M. (2009). Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, developments and future directions. Sprouts: Working papers on information systems, 9(37). Retrieved from http://test.woland.me/pdfjs/pdf.js/test/pdfs/TAMReview.pdf
    10. Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.
    11. Donnelly, D., McGarr, O., & O’Reilly, J. (2011). A framework for teachers’ integration of ICT into their classroom practice. Computers& Education, 57(2), 1469–1483.
    12. Ertmer, P. (1999). Addressing first and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.
    13. Ertmer, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284.
    14. Hinton, L., Simpson, G., & Smith, D. (2008). Increasing self-efficacy beliefs in middle school students using quantum learning. Retrieved from https://www.quantumlearning.com/downloads/QL_Case_Study_Increasing_Selfefficacy_Beliefs_in_Middle_School_Students_using_Quantum_Learning_Techniques%E2%8
    15. Joët, G., Usher, E., & Bressoux, P. (2011). Sources of self-efficacy: An investigation of elementary school students in France. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3).
    16. Klassen, R., Usher, E., & Bong, M. (2010). Teachers’ collective efficacy, job satisfaction, and job stress in cross-cultural context. The Journal of Experimental Education, 78(4), 464–486.
    17. Lai, K-W., & Pratt, K. (2008). Positive to a degree: The effects of ICT use in New Zealand secondary schools. Computers in the Schools, 24(3/4), 95–109. Doi:10.1300/J025v24n03_07
    18. Margolis, H., & McCabe, P. (2003). Self-efficacy: A key to improving the motivation of struggling learners. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 47(4), 162–169.
    19. Margolis, H., & McCabe, P. (2006). Improving self-efficacy and motivation: What to do, what to say. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41(4), 218–227.
    20. Mueller, J., Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Ross, C., & Specht, J. (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers& Education, 51(4), 1523–1537. Doi:10.1016/J.compedu.2008.02.003
    21. Mueller, J., Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Specht, J., & Deyoung, T. (2005). Teachers’ perceptions: Barriers and supports to using technology in the classroom. Education, Communication& Information, 5(2), 187–206.
    22. Oblinger, D. (2014). Designed to engage. EDUCAUSE Review, 49(5). Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/designed-engage
    23. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 35.
    24. Paraskeva, F., Bouta, H., & Papagianni, A. (2008). Individual characteristics and computer selfefficacy in secondary education teachers to integrate technology in educational practice. Computers& Education, 50(3), 1084–1091. Doi:10.1016/J.compedu.2006.10.006
    25. Protheroe, N. (2008). Teacher efficacy: What is it and what does it matter? Principal, (May/June), 42–45. Retrieved from http://www.naesp.org/resources/1/Principal/2008/MJp42.pdf
    26. Schunk, D. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207– 231.
    27. Schunk, D., & Meece, J. (2005). Self-efficacy development of adolescents. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 71–96): Greenwich, CT: Information
    28. Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, selfregulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers& Education, 55(2010), 1721–1731.
    29. So, H., Choi, H., Lim, W., & Xiong, Y. (2012). Little experience with ICT: Are they really the net generation student–teachers? Computers& Education, 59(4), 1234–1245.
    30. Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248.
    31. Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    32. Zimmerman, B. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91.
    33. Zimmerman, B., & Cleary, T. (2006). Adolescents’ development of personal agency: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and self-regulatory skill. In F. Pajares & T. Urdan (Eds.), Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (pp. 45–69). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

    These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

    Links

    Also Read

    Related Collections